Micah Mileto

Humes said in his WC testimony that he had to do "virtually" no work with a saw to remove the brain. The word "virtually" implies he had to cut some bone. Humes told the ARRB "we had to cut some bone". Floyd Riebe and Tom Robinson claim they saw the pathologists using a saw to cut bone.

Does Dave or Chesser have an opinion on this dark path on the left side of the skull x-ray? Could it be a fissure in the brain, or just a bone fracture in the frontal-orbital area?

If we are to suspect the rear back and scalp wounds were faked, what about the "coagulation necrosis" descriptions in the autopsy protocol? Would that information be exaggerated or outright false, or maybe the tissue samples were substituted with samples from real cases?

There is so much more photographic evidence for dark shadows on the back of JFK's head, it just "seems" natural that the Zapruder film would show such dark shadows. And it doesn't necessarily have to be a pure coincidence, either - a multiple shooter conspiracy may take advantage of which direction the sun in shining (even if the Secret Service agents were all wearing sunglasses).

The EOP is where the cerebellum meets the occipital lobe. The brain photos don't show any severe damage to the back of the brain. the HSCA medical panel pointed out the obvious: the brain photos are incompatible with a 6.5 round from the Sixth Floor entering near the EOP. So either the EOP wound did exist and there was some kind of conspiracy, or the EOP wound didn't exist and at least 10 witnesses must be ignored (Humes, Boswell, Finck, Burkley, Kellerman, Stringer, Lipsey, Boyers, Robinson, Grossman) and possibly some physical evidence as well.

https://old.reddit.com/r/JFKeveryday/comments/jzcmqa/small_wounds_in_the_front_of_jfks_head_contents/

Has any medical professional confirmed whether the dark trail on the x-ray of the left side of the head represents a skull fracture or disrupted brain tissue? If it means missing tissue, that means big trouble for the brain photos which show no damage on the outer left side. And it could all but confirm a small hole in the left temple. On the anniversary, I will have a 100 page megapost on the left and right temple wounds.

Thanks. Nice to know it's in good hands.

The Lone Gunman Youtube channel uploaded the John Hunt presentation I thought I would never see, about the third headshot fragment. The third headshot fragment is a drop in the bucket of evidence that was recovered but has gone missing. 4 minutes in: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ngOEn17aWig

This review would've been better if Mantik just stuck to the ballistics.

I found this reference in Palamara's From Parkland To Bethesda: “High Treason”, p. 460---“The first doctor to see what he said was a bullet entry wound near the left temple was Dr. Leto (sic) Porto.”[only reference to Dr. Lito Porto]; It's on page 336 of the 2006 edition. This a quote from the 1989 edition of the book - before Dr. Jones talked about Lito Porto to the ARRB. And there is no other reference or citation for where this information came from.

deleted

Wouldn't it just take one spotter casually standing and blocking the view of the sniper?

If the back wound was somehow physically faked, perhaps A. it was done by somebody who didn't know the surgical defect in the throat was made over a bullet hole, B. they originally intended to fake a frontal exit wound but ended up not doing so for whatever reason, C. they thought the fake back wound looked high enough, or D. they were incompetent in faking a low back wound.

I can't find any other anatomical landmark which could explain the bony bump in the cranium photos. The bump really does look like the external occipital protuberance, viewed from the side, with the center of the photo being the upper-left-rear of the skull.

Thank you so much for clarifying! I saw BEST EVIDENCE in my small local library the other day. I'm glad you're still around, and I'm thrilled that someone like you can acknowledge my existence, let alone type such long comment responses.

http://www.patspeer.com/debunking-the-dictabelt

Boswell turned "white as a sheet" when Josiah Thompson pulled out the Sibert and O'Neill report? Is there an earlier source on that?

After all, it was you and me.

Thank you!

http://www.c2cjournal.ca/2016/12/not-my-rights-movement/

Litwin has a blog promoting trans-exclusionary-radical-femenism.

Are we allowed to say the fact that Fred Litwin actively campaigns against gender minorities?

I wonder if anybody's made a good list of people who said their earlier statements were fabricated by the authorities. I know there's Mercer and Victoria Adams.