Micah Mileto

Looks like the best gamble right now would be to try and replicate more 3d models that match the pictures taken in Dealey Plaza, and seeing if the geometry is compatible with the SBT. That's a few thousand dollars in exchange for what may become a game-changer for how the western establishment is viewed.

It would be hard to explain some of these forensic quandaries in a way that is easy for any audience to quickly grasp

As explained by Dr. Purdy of the HSCA, it is impossible to see beveling on the x-ray. The HSCA panel only contended that the x-rays show some kind of small "shadow" ~4 inches above the EOP (they actually use the word "Radiographic shadow"). An equal number of medical professionals, as listed by Pat Speer, have looked at the X-rays and didn't report finding anything special in that area. Yes, the photographs of the scalp do appear to show some small laceration in the upper back of the head. And yes, the HSCA panel did note a small grayish discoloration around the edges of the red spot. But these do not add up to a bullet entrance wound. Boswell said that he thought that red spot was a small wound connected to the large head wound (The HSCA claimed this couldn't be true because the red spot seemed to clearly have it's own borders, but wounds of the scalp can start from the inside-out just like they can outside-in). We do not even know if the red spot on the photos is directly on top of the small x-ray "shadow". Congress had little basis for declaring the official theory that this cowlick thing represented the one and only small wound in the back of Kennedy's head.

What do people mean when they ask for proof that Oswald wouldn't be convicted in court? I like to think I could be a reasonable member of a jury, and I wouldn't feel comfortable with any of the official theories for obvious reasons. The opinions of average people ARE the court!

Never heard of this. I think it was Gerald Posner who found somebody willing to claim they once heard an audio recording of the shooting.

I have seen some others speculate that the first loud report could've been at the z180's. Pat Speer puts it at z190-224. 224 is Connally's apparent label flop.

As far as Pat Speer showed, the closest thing to credible evidence for a pre-180 shot is Connally's fast head turn. The witness evidence, on the other hand, seem to strongly support the first loud report happening at that time. I don't know if there have been experiments showing how unlikely it would be for the fast head turn to be coincidental. Otherwise, seems obvious to be that all of the witness evidence shows the first loud report after z180. God I wish we had an audio recording of this event.

Connally's testimony is most significant when viewed under the lens of there being no loud report before the z180's

I thought of a possible motivation for lying about how deep the chest incisions went. A body alteration scinareo could have a bullet being removed from the torso using a surgical tool inserted into the pre-made chest cuts.

Has anybody ever made a list of every unidentified figure pictured in Dealey Plaza?

It's not called Destiny Betrayed? "Through the Looking Glass" is such a generic title.

Covered everywhere in the msm, that's not a good sign.

There is nothing on the x-rays confirming or denying the possibility of a shallow hole in the lower back of the skull. It is also difficult to differentiate between bullet fragments and artifacts on the x-rays. The x-rays are low quality and blurry because they were taken with portable equipment made for the battlefields of WW2. Everybody can agree these x-rays could use more scrutiny from experts and machines. And even if the official x-rays provably didn't show any kind of hole in the lower back of the skull, then my contesting argument would be that the x-rays could have been somehow faked or that the EOP wound could have existed lower in the hairline below the skull. There's also nothing confirming or denying a small hole in the lower back of the scalp on the autopsy photos. The autopsy photos are, as the HSCA put it, of low photographic quality. There is witness evidence for missing photos. The contemporaneous documents like the face sheet, Sibert and O'Neill's teletype, the handwritten and typed protocols, supplemental report, and Burkley's death certificate all support the EOP wound. Humes, Boswell, Finck, Roy Kellerman, and John Stringer were four witnesses who gave very precise descriptions of seeing a small hole in the lower back of the head. Other witnesses gave descriptions which were less detailed but also clearly suggested an EOP wound: Burkley, Lipsey, Robinson, and Chester Boyers. More witness and document evidence suggests an EOP wound includes the damage to the brainstem and cerebellum and the "bullet lodged behind the President's ear" FBI memo. There is literally no way to debunk this unless an exhumation and second autopsy proves otherwise.

What do you think about the EOP wound? Seems like no matter how the EOP subject is approached, it strongly supports a conspiracy.

McClelland's claim to fame was handling blood and guts, his family members would be used to hearing about that stuff. But yes, it's likely that more than one square of fabric would have to be cut away in order to test it for mercury.

Dr. Robert McClelland's family members still have his bloody white coat saved. I wonder if anybody would want to try testing their luck and having it submitted to a lab.

Does Last Second In Dallas have any more information about the quote "I wish they would stop putting bullets on these stretchers"?

What about the Russian Oswald documents? I thought I remembered you mentioning something like that on Black Op Radio.

That's what happens when people refuse to look at information produced by those they disagree with politically, they end up skipping over a lot of important primary sources.

Can we make a list of documents that are known to exist but have not yet been seen by the public? I know there's the files that have still not been declassified, everything at the National Archives II building, Wesleyan university's Manchester collection, University of South Florida's Kathleen Cunningham collection, old VHS tapes like the Pittsburgh medical witness conference, John Hunt's material, Bart Kamp's collection, David Lifton's collection, the tapes of most JFK research conferences, a good quality Prayer Man image... Didn't the Russian government have a stack of unseen files on Oswald that they offered to sell to the U.S. Government until they declined? EDIT: Also, documents that were known to exist but were apparently destroyed? The Secret Service destroyed some records in the 70's and more in the 90's after being asked for them by the ARRB.

Any reschedule info?

Have they confirmed that this is censorship?

Are there any places still on the internet where people go to argue that the forensic evidence supports the official story?

I thought there were x-rays of the neck? https://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/reportvols/vol7/pages/HSCA_Vol7_0054a.jpg

It would be nice to one day make a multi-part post directly quoting every point of information suggesting lost bullets, shrapnel, and shell casings. In the meantime, most of these are introduced in Barry Krusch's book, a couple are introduced in the HSCA's firearms report, some are from Robert Harris's old website, and the rest are from various other websites and books that can probably be reached by googling the names or key words in quotation marks.