Andrew Prutsok

I've always contended that if the deep state were really out to get Trump, he was such a threat to them, why wouldn't they just have killed? Just like they've done to every other such person.

The cell calls from airplanes -- over rural Pennsylvania -- in 2001 was what first put up red flags for me.

Deep State will come after Biden if he's not careful. First ending war in Afghanistan and now this:

Marina is tweeting about this.

Why is Spike Lee’s 9/11 docuseries so controversial? https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2021/sep/01/spike-lee-nyc-epicenters-9-11-hbo-documentary-series

Out of curiosity I have read several obits on Asner. Not a single mention of his role in JFK, which I consider his best work.

Will the vice president intervene?

Spike Lee is being trashed by mainstream outlets today over his new 911 documentary. The last of the six episodes apparently gives some screen time to Architects and Engineers for 912 Truth.

Everyone says the Deep State had it out for Trump. If so, why didn't it just murder him like it had done so many times before with people it had it in for?

I would guess we leave the arms behind as free samples, to impress the primitives and hopefully they will become future arms customers.

I cannot find a link to your review of Baker's book and would be interested in reading it. Thanks.

Hoping you were not 12 in 1965: https://pagesix.com/2021/08/16/bob-dylan-sued-for-allegedly-sexually-abusing-12-year-old-in-1965/

Looks like the final end result of our last 56 years continues to play out.

I honestly cannot recall when I was not interested in it.

Five months before assassination on visit to Ireland. Didn't play well for me, jumpy. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/aug/04/previously-unseen-1963-video-of-john-f-kennedy-emerges-in-ireland

People don't return from where they've gone.

They always, ALWAYS, accuse their opponent of the very things they are doing.

I thought below was the question being asked in the initial post in this thread to which an answer was sought: What evidence (needn’t even be proof, since the two words have different meanings) can any of the above muster for the assertion that Ekdahl did anything other than his traveling electrical consultant job for EBASCO? As in, you know, intel? And perhaps you could hazard a guess why he would take (a) Marguerite with him while doing this TOP SECRET work?

So, if someone answers the question directly and provides evidence, it still doesn't mean anything?

Things are hopping in the Caribbean.

So did Theorharis content Hoover was not a cross-dresser, or that it just wasn't important?

What a great article. Not sure I buy that the author's conclusion that Phillips was totally innocent because he became involved too early. His involvement apparently dates from March of 1962. I wouldn't be surprised if the conspirators had decided by then what had to be done.

Big shocker here: "Two Americans arrested in connection with the assassination of President Jovenel Moïse of Haiti this week said that they were not in the room when he was killed and that they had worked only as translators for the hit squad."..."Judge Noël said that it was [one of the Americans] who had yelled that the assailants were agents of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency over a loudspeaker at the start of the assault."

Chait's a hack. Generally wrong about everything.

Well, this story apparently fell apart pretty quickly. This has apparently been out there for years and is not a part of the training program. The poster regrets the error.