Michael Clark

...

There is at least on thread, active in the last two years, that has a good account of the the man being taken out of the back. I can’t remember enough to find it quickly. I think Steve Thomas shared the specific, interesting, and credible account of that occurrence.

https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/104-10186-10407.pdf 20-9

Ahh, ok.

No. Please explain a bit, if you will. Don’t leave it at that.

The MSM wants the story to begin and end with two intrepid newspapermen (no CIA here). ****** edit **** abbing a link on James McCord jr., here..

The single most important thing that Files brings to the table is what I think is the best explanation for the damage and blowout of JFK’s head as we see it in the Zapruder film.... the mercury bullet fired from the fence line.

Kathy, when I was working with Tom there was no rule against what I was doing, and I like quite a few others, I am sure, have no Idea how deep these schisms go. I did not repost language and invectives against admin or members from other forums. It’s quite different. And seriously, are we never supposed to repost existing EF posts from banned members. It just gets so complicated that I find it unfortunate. And here I feel like I have run afoul with you.

I would suggest Aesop’s fables. I also would would scratch the surcease of great writers and orators, just enough that he becomes familiar with those names and gets a taste what is great writing and why it is great writing. Cicero Thucidites Plato Aristotle shakespeare Chaucer enlightenment writers. Very Importantly, don’t just accept that “math is just not his thing”.Do something, some camp, or immersion to lift that veil, clear the fog. It’s hugely important to not walk away from math feeling like a failure, or that you just can’t do it. Classes are too short in school, not time to get in any kind of groove. mike

I do recall how this came about. The title of the thread gets the to the heart of the problem and the admins should not be expected to parse-out the minute letter and spirit of this problem. Common sense should suffice. Jim Hargrove, reacting to some understandable consternation, was posting multiple posts, almost verbatim, a near continuous dialogue from a banned member. Those posts contained language and insinuations that were clearly against this forums expectations of decorum, but because they were quotes from elsewhere, they were seeping-in. I like Jim very much, but he was uncharacteristically on-tilt at that time and I recall being aggravated that just this sort of problem, and heavy handed ruling would come about, along with all of its attendant complications. I even warned him about what he was doing and what might come of it; but he dismissed my warning. As noted earlier in this thread, Tom Scully and I teamed up on some important (IMO) digging, which included some limited cross-posting and it was fruitful, did no harm, breached no rules or etiquette and all was well. It even, I had hoped, went some distance towards mending some gates, as opposed to fences, and that we might some day, before wa are all dead, find some room for reconciliatiation in some cases. Unfortunately, Jim’s cross postings were just an aggravating instance of what could be, and the hammer came down. It’s all very unfortunate, and I would not blame James or other admins from dealing with these things on a case by case basis rather than standing by a rule that creates situations and questions which are far more cumbersome than was the intent of the rule. It would seem to be common sense that if you are acting as a proxy for a particular member who still exhibits manners, or language, which got that person banned in the first place, then your not doing the right thing. It’s pretty simple, and there are no stupid people here.

In this interview Chip Tatum discusses a pair of drugs that could be administered weeks apart to get someone to do something like an assassination in a hypnotic state. It is between the 60 min. Mark and 1:15 mark, I believe.

Why not name names, Vince? I would think that if he is about to publish a book, and is so well read, he must, already, have some kind of presence in the community or in relevant social media, no?

I have tried to listen to these podcasts before and, like this one, I cannot suffer the time-filling devices he uses to fill-out his show. I would like to hear a synopsis, skip to interesting sections, or press-on listening if there were some assurances that it gets better as it drags-on.

Simple answer from me..... A limited hangout to protect the agency, blame Democrats for tearing themselves apart, downplaying hiss own involvement, and leaving something sellable for his son that might also serve as protection for St. John. I wold be surprised if St. John did not have some more valuable and authentic goods stashed-away, as well. On a side note...Perhaps I missed it but, our own @William Plumlee Tosh Plumlee, as well as St. John Hunt have recently stated that Hunt was on board Plumlee,s flight to Dallas on 11-22-63. I checked-in here a few times, after that story came out but I, surprisingly, did not see it here. Michael

Joe, If you have not read the Furniture Mart episode in the WCR, you may find, after doing so, that there may have been a second, full, Oswald family, in the Dallas area in the fall of 63; of which Marina, the DPD LHO, or both, may not have been aware. Michael

Thanks Danny, That is very important work, IMO. Michael

David Von Pein, how much money do you make by participating in the coup? Monthly? Yearly? Daily? tell us...

David Von Pein...... The amount of money that you make by maintaining a website that buries our President who was killed in a Coup de ta remains a mysteryto me. Care to share? How much do you make by perpetuating the coup? Michael

Lance, How do you figure that the guy, Bill Hunter, a Dallas reporter, was shot and killed, by police, in the 16 hours between the two interviews of Jack Ruby’s roommate, George Senator’s, differing Warren Commission testimonies, when George was the guy who gave that same reporter a tour of Ruby’s apartment on Sunday, the 24th of November,1963. Lance, feeling guilty, yet?

Harr Harry, I am sorry, I can be of no help with that at all. Michael

Reserved

From my reiading of recent documents, I think it will get noone nowhere to try to find an ultimate, in fact, top dog in MC, in October of 63. There were too many offices with interests in MC, all answering to disparate offices in DC, for Win Scott to be more than a host, not a boss, for them all. I see Hunt on base through an unknown office (he had been COS a decade earlier, with William F Buckley as a subordinate); I see James McCord as an office of Security electronics specialist supervisor working with or under Hunt in 63. David Phillips arriving on the 7th of.November is another example; Scott was not his boss; just his host, in a very busy, tricky and confused situation. Hell, Anne Exeter (sp.?) is excercising executive authority with regard to the photographic operations on the consulates and embassies at that time; (again, this is my reading of documents).

...