John Kowalski

Yesterday I went to the archive's lawyers office to get copies of Bloomfield's documents. Received 2 CDs containing more than 2,000 documents that the archives previously refused to release to me. They only held back 92 documents because they are deemed to be protected by solicitor client privilege. The archives provided me with a document called a "privilege log", which is a list of names of people to whom letters are addressed to, none of the names on this list are important. Have also asked the archives to update their restrictions on access to the Bloomfield collection so other researchers will be able to access them. After this issue is settled, I will probably settle the case.

Who prepared the statement?

Will be looking forward to reading it, in the mean time there is Lisa's new book. Do you know if she interviewed him?

The interview was on ABC on The Alec Baldwin Show." The link is below, the RFK episode is not there but may appear soon. The interview covers 2 topics, his new book and his father's assassination. You will certainly like it. https://abc.go.com/shows/the-alec-baldwin-show/episode-guide

Robert F. Kennedy jr. was interviewed recently by Alec Baldwin. He asked Kennedy if he knew who killed his father, and he replied that he is pretty sure he knows who was responsible. He would not say who it was, and said that there should be another investigation and that Sirhan Sirhan should be paroled. Any comments about his knowing who was responsible? Does anyone believe that he could have been able to find out who the conspirators were? Mark Lane made a similar comment at the 2013 Pittsburgh JFK conference. He said that he knew who assassinated Kennedy but could not reveal it because of some legal issue.

Paz: What do you mean by respect? Do you believe that I am not being respectful to Michele after all of the work he has done?

Paz: Metta says he was the founder of Permindex. He states this a number of times in his book. Being an investor is not the same as founding the company. There are also other investors in the company, does that mean that they are founders as well? If he was an investor in the company Metta should have stated that instead of saying he was the founder. A founder of a company is someone who created the company, it was the founder's idea that the company should have been created. This is not the case. Metta offers no proof in his book that Permindex was Bloomfield's idea. And again, if he founded the company, why is he not on CMC's board of director? I am also getting tired of your rants. Your responses are defensive and angry. You need to calm down.

I can assure you that he was not a founder. I checked the documents that Paz said were CMC's board of directors, Bloomfield's name is not on it. If he founded the company, he would be on its board of directors. I also have a copy of the Financial Post's "Directory of Directors" for the years 1957, 1959, 1960, 1961, 1962 and 1963. This directory is list of business men and the companies they are directors of. There is no reference to either Permindex or CMC for Bloomfield in this directory. This belief that Bloomfield founded this company has never been supported by actual evidence.

Have not asked him for this info. Has anyone else asked for it?

Have an update on the court case. Had another tele-conference with the court regarding Bloomfield's files. They are going to review all letters they have deemed to be subject to solicitor-client privilege (SCP). If they find a letter that they believe should not be subject to SCP, it will copied and put on a disc that will be given to me. The work will be done by mid-December. If I am not satisfied with the letters that are not released, I still have the option of arguing my case in front of a judge.

They are not weird questions, those documents are written in Italian, that is why I asked. Bloomfield's name is not included in those documents, which does not surprise me because I do not believe he founded Permindex or played a management role in the operation of CMC. Until I see a document that states otherwise, Bloomfield's role, as he described it in one of his letters, was to represent the interest of someone involved with these companies. Who this is unknown.

Hi Paz: The Bloomfield court case is ongoing and I have had my first conference with the archive's lawyers, Quebec law society who have intervened in my case, and a court official. At the end of the month we will have another meeting with them to see if we can settle the issue of access to the documents with out going to court. This has been a long process but now that we have had our first meeting, there is a possibility that we can settle this issue without going to court, hopefully sometime early in 2019. On page 7 of Michele's book he states that Permindex was founded by Bloomfield, what is the source for this statement? The documents available online contain the name of different people. Do any of these documents contain the names of CMC's board of directors? Does Michele have a document that has the names of the board of directors of Permindex? John

David: Read your article about the rifle and the pistol. Excellent work. I have RCMP documents regarding their investigation of the pistol that was shipped from Canada to Seaport Traders. If you want to review them let me know and I will forward them to you. John

David: You wrote an essay about the rifle. Would like to read it, can you tell me where I can find it?

Just ordered a copy as well, thank you for letting us know about it.

The fact that there are so many theories about Kennedy's murder is not a problem. People interpret evidence differently and can arrive at different conclusions. The fact that people arrive at different conclusions has no bearing on the historical truth about what happened that day in Dallas. Whether you believe Oswald acted alone or Kennedy was killed by a conspiratorial cabal, the fact that people can't agree about what happened will not change the truth about what actually did happen.

You are allowed 3 free searches but can't download but you are allowed to print. After you locate the file, on the left hand side, there is a print button.

Michael: Thanks for the info. Always interested in documents related to Permindex and CMC. John

Michael: Thanks for the info. Always interested in documents related to Permindex and CMC. John

Bloomfield knew Stephenson and the Rockefeller. They are mentioned in his letters. He moved with the upper echelons of society in Canada, US and Europe. He was a very-well connected man. The link below is a letter written by Bloomfield in which he mentions Dulles. https://archive.org/details/Dulles_201807

I could not find the references to pages 418 and 487-491 in Dope Inc., because the copy I downloaded from internet archive only has 406 pages. It is true, Bloomfield is connected to many in power elite, he had contact with the Rothschilds, Stephenson, and other notable people. But this contact with them does not prove he was participant in the Kennedy assassination, or other deep political events. Dope inc. is written by Lyndon Larouche's North American Labour Party, and anything written by them is not supported by facts. He wrote about Permindex in Executive Intelligence Review, and it it he claimed that Bloomfield was working with Albert Osborne in the operation of a group of assassins. I never found any connection between Osborne and Bloomfield when I was researching my story about Osborne. Larouche also claims that Canada is run by the English monarchy. It is not, Canada is a democracy and the queen has no power, she is only a figurehead.

Jim: I will have a look at it. John

The research I have done shows that he does not necessarily know much about the backgrounds of the people he is working with. The letters I have read are concerned only with mundane business matters, and does not discuss the deep political activities that Permindex and CMC were accused of.

Thank you Robert, and I will keep everyone posted on the progress of my case.

I do not like conspiracy theorist either. The connotations of those words do not do justice to those people who have dedicated so much time and effort to unraveling the truth about the Kennedy assassination. I prefer the word historical researchers because that is what we are doing, conducting historical research. The legal problem does not exist; their stated reason for closing the files, which is solicitor-client privilege, is not real, and I have the proof. I believe that the archives closed certain files in the Bloomfield fond because Bloomfield's widow, or if she is no longer alive, someone else, asked for it to be closed. The reason for the closure may have been a reaction to the October 2017 file release which focused the public's attention on the Kennedy assassination.