Dennis Berube

Has anyone else seen this? Btw, wait for 3:02 for a JFK reference out of left field, Tucker is an interesting anomaly on MSM media no matter what you think of him.

Chris, that is a decent video in my opinion considering most people have no idea how much money the Gates Foundation doles out to numerous PR firms, the WHO, NIH, almost all "news" outlets including NPR, vaccine companies, and on and on. Jeff, I agree with you that we have a real virus, the latest investigation points toward lab creation and I have no doubt that a leak, whether intentional or not, is possible. The problem with the "lockdown" people in my opinion is that they do not perform due diligence in analyzing the effects of lockdowns. For example, the 1980 Bluestone study concluded something close to 35,000 people die for every 1% increase in unemployment, I hear almost nothing on the MSM about lockdown induced negative effects. Due to the death certificate changes in reporting, it is now impossible to know how many people died and/or are forever negatively impacted by the lockdown itself. Regardless, the states that have had the most restrictions have performed worse (relative case and death) than some that didn't, like Florida vs. New York or California for example. No matter how you view it, the difference is certainly not so obvious that we must exclusively use that as the only tool to fight this virus. The CDC's latest study indicated mask use decreased cases by 1.5% and the lockdowns by roughly 2%, and that's the CDC (not a bastion of honesty). The total societal cost to the public is too great to justify any kind of lockdown, especially when small businesses are forcibly closed or curtailed and anyone and their sick brother can still walk into walmart with a mask. Critics of that view would say something about 500k+ dead is the reason, but that was largely with high levels of mask compliance and civil restrictions. This has greatly increased the wealth and power of the bigtech firms, Amazon, and of course, the biggest banks, at the direct expense of the small businesses. The 1st Amendment Freedom of Assembly should stand here and allow people the choice to do what they think is best for themselves. Btw, the European Medical Agency was hacked recently and communications between regulators and vaccine companies revealed that Pfizer is not forthcoming about aspects of their shot which may have safety implications. But what did we expect from a company that has paid billions of dollars for crimes like bribing judges, falsifying drug trial safety data, paying kickbacks, etc.....

Considering Q-anon is most likely a psy-op whose goal is to discredit whomever its controllers decide to, this is a logical development. I believe we are approaching a flash point with this. The insanity of the propaganda to vaccinate everyone against something that the vast majority of people will survive, is bizarre and not based on any firm science at all. In fact, the potential consequences of such a campaign do most certainly include a mass death event, depopulation. To the above point, a vaccine expert who has worked at senior positions for the Gates Foundation, GAVI, and other bigpharma companies recently came out and said "We must halt all ongoing Covid-19 mass vaccination campaigns" because we are essentially destroying peoples natural immunity (NK cells) which are flexible in its response to virus variants, of which there are already thousands. It is the unprecedented nature of vaccinating people while the virus is constantly mutating that will likely lead to "viral escape". I can't urge everyone enough to watch this interview before he is labeled as some kind of Q-Anon put up job, it would be tough to call this guy an anti-vaxxer. This is where we are at folks and shame on us for allowing a multi billionaire who literally said we can reduce the population if we are good about vaccinations (no one ever asked him how vaccines would lower the population), to have such control that he does. Btw, his only explanation for that previous point I have ever heard is something like "The healthier people are, the less babies they have". Considering he has spent at least $10-15 billion dollars on his "decade of vaccines" research, how many lives could he have made healthier through simpler efforts like sanitation improvement? Anyone remember (right before the "decade of vaccines" was announced) the "Good Club" meeting in 2009 with Gates, David Rockefeller, Oprah and other billionaires where they discussed the horrible overpopulation issue through the cover of philanthropy? "May they for God’s sake draw the world’s attention to what I think is now likely to become the biggest and most tragic mistake made in the history of public health in general and in the field of vaccination in particular." - G. Vanden Bossche interview can be found here: https://open.lbry.com/@Dryburgh:7/geert-vanden-bossche-open-letter-to-who-halt-all-covid-19-mass-vaccination:e his paper: https://www.deblauwetijger.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Geert-vanden-Bossche-2.pdf

Linking his past crimes to his legal stance on masks which is due to his governor, is an incorrect comparison to me and has misleading implications.

Thank you for the contribution Chris and well written. Like yourself, I have been amazed at just how little critical thought has taken place in the last year. It is so bad now that most people will usually end up saying "I don't want to talk about it" before the conversation even really begins. The web of propaganda regarding this covid event is far beyond anything we have ever seen, even including historical cliches like Russia or North Korea. Unfortunately, the public has completely lost their minds and have been unable to link the Biofascists together. Tuberculosis killed over 1.4 million people in 2019 yet most people don't seem to know what it is, a lung disease spread through the air, even the Gates funded fact checkers have a hard time explaining this away. If one examines the current situation in Israel, basically the infant stages of a dual society where those who are "good" aka get the gene therapy, can do as they please and those who do not lose all civil rights. This should be universally rejected, instead, Democrats seem to be leading the charge away from the Constitution under the guise of safety. Once upon a time, a good leader said we have nothing to fear but fear itself, now we must fear freedom apparently if you ask Biden or 99% of all Democrats.

To say that and then support politicians who never question the actions of the central bank is not consistent. This is bipartisan, not about Trump or Biden. The NY fed has distributed over $12 TRILLION to its friendly mega banks since September 2019, just a few months before the virus that then destroyed Main Street small business. This is tantamount to a coup and while congress quibbles over $2 trillion which they are already celebrating, the central banks are laughing. The actions of the fed since 2008 combined with the now legal total secrecy of accounting via a “national security” excuse (2018 fasab 56), equals a dismemberment of democracy. Trump didn’t do that, Obama/Biden didn’t do that either. Again, this is bipartisan and the only discussion allowed in public now is how many masks or “operating system” jabs we will wear/get. Remember what happened in Japan in the 1980’s? The central bankers arbitrarily stopped the flow of cheap credit in order to change the political system to give themselves more power. When you give a private network the power to control credit, you have a major national security ticking time-bomb.

Good lord. So the aliens brought down JFK and Nixon now? We can thank the good whistleblower Hunt for enlightenment once again.

I came across this tidbit from reading Catherine Austin Fitts' account of working at the Dillon and Read Wall Street firm where she was a partner before entering government. Btw, that firm was started by the father of the C Douglas Dillon that worked in the JFK administration at Treasury. Her source for the story is the book by Dan Briody called The Halliburton Agenda. Pages 93-114. It's nothing earth shattering, but still interesting imo. Her full story, which is very much worth reading, can be found here https://dillonreadandco.com/. The closeness of the Brown & Root relationship with Dillon Read is also underscored by Briody’s description of the head of Brown & Root’s frustration with Lyndon Johnson’s decision to serve as John Kennedy’s running mate. He quotes August Belmont, by then a leader of Dillon Read, who was with Brown in Houston in his private hotel suite listening to the radio coverage of Johnson’s announcement. According to Belmont, “Herman Brown….jumped up from his seat and said, ‘Who told him he could do that?’ and ran out of the room.”

At least someone is asking the right questions, although Biden is obviously more concerned with gene therapy and protecting Monsanto. The "going direct" part of this was approved in 2019 at G-7. It would have been a tough sell on the public if we had another "too big to fail" moment. This requires something big to create trillions to give to your friends while congress haggles over scraps for people they stripped incomes from.

Does this even require a comment? The propaganda has never been this bad. And yes Doug, co2 is already becoming the next excuse for why we must obey the "experts" suggestions for not living a normal life. Its best we not think about it as the NY Times and others do that for us.

Ap fact checker, really Cliff? I do enjoy some good humor... Pelosi did not say that on Jan 6, supposedly she mentioned optics to Irving in the months leading up to it, which he cited as one excuse. Miller, who approved the final request, is the one saying Trump told him they would need 10,000. Pelosi may well be a victim of circumstance in this case, but no matter how you look at it, the lack of security was almost comical. What do you think the response would have been if the protesters stormed Ft Dietrich or a Raytheon research facility? Between Irving and Sund, someone is apparently lying about the 1:09pm request from Sund to Irving. Pelosi's office claimed she "approved" the request at 1:43. Irving says he didnt even get a request until after 2pm. Pelsoi then told her staff to contact McConnell for approval. Considering the 9/11 style treatment this event has been receiving, it is likely that the truth will suffer in some fashion. https://dailycaller.com/2021/02/27/sources-nancy-pelosi-sergeant-at-arms-paul-irving-national-guard-capitol-riot/ https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/21/us/politics/capitol-riot-security-delays.html

I have always wondered about Zapruder. Considering he was a 33rd degree Mason and apparently a member of some CIA fronts, Dallas council of world affairs and crusade for a free europe, he's interesting. This was a Greg Burnham article on the subject. http://www.hiddenmysteries.org/themagazine/vol8/articles/zapruder.shtml I have just always found it difficult to believe that someone filming like he was would be able to keep such a steady view whilst gun shots were going off around him.

Apparently, Trump had asked for 10,000 national guard for January 6th. The story about why they were not called is not clear and involves Pelosi claiming "optics" apparently as an excuse. That is not very credible considering everyone knew there was going to be a sizable crowd that thought the election was a selection. Jim, was this talked about at all during the trial? https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2021/01/embedding-with-pentagon-leadership-in-trumps-chaotic-last-week https://thenationalpulse.com/breaking/pelosi-capitol-police-chief-natl-guard/

https://swprs.org/q-anon-may-have-been-an-fbi-psyop/

Back to "normal" with the new Republican party. This is a disgrace. I guess we can start the international death toll count for Biden. Add this to his complete (FDA) inaction on the recent report about dangerous levels of heavy metals in baby food in the US and he's really off to a great start. Oh yeah, and his political censorship actions with BigTech. It would sound like a joke to even ask if Garland is going to actually prosecute these protected criminal banks or ignore them like Obama and Trump did. Is this seriously what the "left" wing consists of at this point?

Sorry Doug, I do not believe UFOs are from anywhere other than Earth and i have not seen any evidence of that which could be confirmed of extraterrestrial origin. This stuff sounds like an offshoot of the Urantia eugenics/alien garbage. I find the UFO story interesting because it points to advanced technology that is controlled and confined to a certain covert power structure. Until the public knows exactly what technology exists, how can we evaluate UFOs in a meaningful way?

Sorry, I thought we were discussing the cooperative censorship on this issue between government and bigtech. It's not difficult to explain Cliff. Simply, more and more people began to realize there is something wrong about what they thought they knew about vaccines; due to people like RFK Jr's social media presence. For the good of all, I think we're done here.

Do we need further proof that government an social media are in tandem censoring information Cliff? Seeing you viewed the Schiff demand for "moderation" as old news, this was today. https://www.usnews.com/news/top-news/articles/2021-02-19/exclusive-white-house-working-with-facebook-and-twitter-to-tackle-anti-vaxxers Same here, and it is regrettable to certain degree.

https://schiff.house.gov/news/press-releases/schiff-sends-letter-to-google-facebook-regarding-anti-vaccine-misinformation Good luck Cliff. It will be tough to hold onto private property rights in the future anyway if this Gates/WEF/Central Banker push actually succeeds. It's not difficult to see where the demand for censorship is coming from on this issue. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/how-bill-gates-controls-global-messaging-and-censorship/ Jeff/Chris, good posts. That Edward Curtin article is on point with this topic. Another link to the same article for those that may have missed it from Jeff. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/real-reason-robert-f-kennedy-jr-censored/

Moderation = free speech? That's kind of bass ackwards Cliff. Moderation would be something like violating community rules that all members agree on when they sign up, like this forum for instance. I challenge you to find the IG rules that state asking a question about someones' death is not allowed or could get you banned. If you want to defend to the right to "moderate" questions, that's fine, but that is what your argument boils down to. Here's another reason why I completely disagree Cliff. Facebook (who owns IG), just like Amazon, Google and other BigTech companies that you defend, have many ties with some of the shadiest parts of the American power structure. There are potentially so many contracts, the public can not even discover some of them (link below). The point being, it is somewhat ridiculous to claim that these bigtech companies are completely private and independent of government. If it was just BigTech, it would still be a problem, but its actually worse than that Cliff. US and UK intelligence have "declared war" on any vaccine criticism. Would you like to defend them as well? I know that in the JFK case, I cannot really think of an example of a US intelligence agency that willingly told the truth about any aspect of the case. In fact, I recall a "Get Garrison" team at CIA. That was in the 60's, now the tools of propaganda and disinformation are far more sophisticated and less transparent. Do you think we are getting an objective representation of this issue in our MSM media Cliff? https://www.europereloaded.com/us-uk-intel-agencies-declare-cyber-war-on-independent-media-over-vaccines/ Regarding BigTech/government ties, I found a MSM source for your comfort. https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/thousands-contracts-highlight-quiet-ties-between-big-tech-u-s-n1233171

Well said Jim, but please, don't slander the Gallagher brothers. Regarding the LA protest. This brief article is worth a read. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/dear-the-defender-media-wrong-about-dodger-stadium-protest/ Also, regarding Jan 6; I'm sure there is more (or perhaps far less) to the story, but it certainly looks like this Antifa guy was pretending to be a pro-Trumper on Jan 6. It's on many different sites at this point. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/02/raises-serious-red-flags-cnn-nbc-paid-black-lives-matter-leader-john-sullivan-35000-piece-us-capitol-riot-footage/ https://meaww.com/cnn-nbc-pay-insurrectionist-john-sullivan-35000-each-capitol-riot-footage-internet-reactions

Cliff/Kirk, RFK Jr. was banned from IG for saying Hank Aaron recently had the Moderna vaccine and then died within a few weeks. That is a non-contestable fact. The legacy media then made up a story about how the coroner's office assured everyone his death was not vaccine related, that was scientifically not possible as RFK Jr discovered they never had his body at any point, much less examined it. This has not been redacted as far as I know. That story is relatively unimportant in the grand scheme of things and I (or RFK Jr) am certainly not saying he died from the vaccine. The point is that we are not allowed to even ask the question or have the debate. If you must have my personal answer to your pet question for some reason, I would say the Equal Protection Clause would be my starting point. How is banning someone from IG for asking questions and stating facts any more acceptable than banning a black/white/red/anything person from a private golf course? One difference might be that IG is much closer to a public forum than a private golf course is, meaning, as far as the public is concerned, it might even be a more profound form of discrimination in certain ways. Here's your polisci101 question: Should the government allow any private business to prevent access to their service/goods based on what they think? Guess what? This is exactly whats coming. The horrendous Israeli government seems content to take the lead. Of course, just like the Patriot Act, it's all for our own safety. I wonder if the Founding Fathers had any thoughts about trading freedom for security...

Are you serious Cliff? Government officials serve and answer to the public, obviously private citizens do not. With government, the public at least theoretically has the capability to hold them responsible or at least demand answers. I agree with Cory's statements, it is odd people are fine with so much private influence, but can't stand it from government. I would at least partially attribute that to many years of anti-government propaganda from such areas as the Koch brothers, Rockefellers, CFR types etc... Of course government is bad for them, its the only feasible entity standing in their way. But having "left" wingers believe that too is rather amazing. Kirk, I fully expected heavier censorship of this issue many months ago when I realized Trump authorized Operation Warp Speed which basically allowed criminally convicted companies like Pfizer (specifically for withholding drug safety data in one case btw) the ability to take a process that normally takes 7-10 years and condense it into a few months. Oh, and also completely remove any liability from their products side effects, which will never be knowable scientifically as the placebo groups are already being vaxxed after less than a years worth of study. That type of approach to vaccines requires censorship and propaganda to work. This is exactly what the entire Democratic party should be thinking right now. They have championed the social media censorship of all the things they disagree without apparently thinking about the long term consequences. If a POTUS can effectively be censored (like when Trump was tweeting to the mob to go home and respect police on Jan 6th), then its only a matter of time before your guy is censored. Instead, the left wing value set is now almost indistinguishable from corporate America value set, identity politics, virtue signaling and complete adherence/deference to some of the largest power structures this world has. Biden's AG secretary Vilsack is a great example of this, not much noise from the left on "Mr. Monsanto" joining the ranks. Cliff, make the remedy whatever you want. Any democracy requires freedom of information that gets to the public. That concept is already largely gone from public discourse, but if we are to have any hope of holding onto America, it must happen in some way. Saying "goto another platform" is akin to saying, "goto the corner where no one can hear you". A milder version of this is exactly what has prevented the reality of the JFK case from being reality. At least in the 60's and 70's you could occasionally have someone debate the facts on a mass media platform, as slanted and biased as it was. Nowadays its far worse. When does Jim DiEugenio get on television to debate the facts with any news anchor? It will never happen and it is censorship of the facts from the public discussion which enables these things to continue.

Cliff, if you read my entire post I mentioned the exact post regarding Hank Aaron that IG used to remove him after they took him out of context and then apparently lied about information related to the case. What does Parler have to do with this? We are in a situation that requires some logic and reasonable lawmaking, I hope we get it. Just about everyone under the age of 20 are on their phones constantly. In terms of information they are exposed to or are given, the majority of of them use private companies like YouTube, Twitter, and IG. Those are all censored media outlets. Private companies (some with heavy military complex ties) are now serving as public information services akin to the newspapers of old and should be regulated as such. One of the main ways many young people get involved in politics these days is through social media. We are allowing private citizens who answer to no one or someone unknown decide what people are allowed to discuss and think based on whatever interests they serve. If that isn't a concern to you, fine. I think its a recipe for disaster.

RFK Jr's social media accounts were recently deleted and permanently removed. He had roughly 800k followers. Additionally, his niece wrote a hit piece for the NY Times (or another high profile paper, I forget) that was full of factual inaccuracies. They did not allow RFK Jr to publish a response! Many other accounts were purged at the same time last week that related to questioning the covid narrative, vaccines, etc... We all know what happens when only one side of a story is promulgated through the authoritarian "official" channels of information delivery, this is bad news. It is to the point where big tech has censored clips from C-SPAN! The flat earth society apparently does not need to be censored; this has nothing to do with misinformation or inaccurate statements by RFK Jr. One more example. Hank Aaron died last month. RFK Jr pointed out that Mr. Aaron actually went public and there was a news story about himself getting the moderna vaccine and how it is something all black people should do. The MSM responded by saying the local coroner's office said his death was not related to the vaccine. It turns out the coroner never examined Aaron's body at all. That was then used to remove his instagram account. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/national-media-vaccine-misinformation-hank-aaron/?itm_term=home