Bill Brown

No. Hines did not say anything about the electricity being off. She said the lights to the phones went dead because there were no incoming calls, nothing about the electricity being off. It's myths like this which get repeated as fact that muddy the waters.

Thanks Greg. Much appreciated.

What time do you believe Oswald left the rooming house?

http://jfkfiles.blogspot.com/2022/

Then get the prints checked to see if identification is possible.

Again, no one saw the killer touch the front of the patrol car. Yet, you continue to state that those prints belong to the killer. You've already been corrected on your claim that the killer went around the front of the patrol car (and therefore touched the car as he did so) before firing the final shot to the head. I'm pretty sure Myers informed you that Tatum has the killer beginning to flee to the west before then going back around the rear of the patrol car to fire the final shot.

In the first statement that Baker wrote directly by himself without the filter of a third party, he initially wrote that Oswald was drinking a Coke when he saw him. Granted, Baker wrote this statement on 9/23/64, but it was the first statement that he himself gave directly. Then, Baker lined out the part about the Coke. No. Baker did not write that statement. However, before signing it, he made the necessary corrections (crossing out the reference to the Coke). In other words, the statement was written by Burnett and before signing it, Baker made whatever necessary corrections that needed to be made. Hell, David Von Pein did a damn good write up on this, if you'd just go read it.

Question: How does a conspiracy advocate address the fact that Oswald ditched the jacket he was wearing between the rooming house and the shoe store? Answer: Deny that it was Oswald who was standing in the recessed entrance of the shoe store without a jacket.

Nice try.

AFFIDAVIT IN ANY FACTTHE STATE OF TEXASCOUNTY OF DALLAS BEFORE ME, Mary Rattan, a Notary Public in and for said County, State of Texas, on this day personally appeared T.F. Bowley w/m/35 of 1454 Summertime Lane, TE6 5965 who, after being by me duly sworn, on oath deposes and says: On Friday November 22, 1963 I picked up my daughter at the R. L. Thornton School in Singing Hills at about 12:55 pm. I then left the school to pick up my wife who was at work at the Telephone Company at Ninth Street and Zangs Street. I was headed north on Marsalis and turned west on 10th Street. I traveled about a block and noticed a Dallas police squad car stopped in the traffic lane headed east on 10th Street. I saw a police officer lying next to the left front wheel. I stopped my car and got out to go to the scene. I looked at my watch and it said 1:10 pm. Several people were at the scene. When I got there the first thing I did was try to help the officer. He appeared beyond help to me. A man was trying to use the radio in the squad car but stated he didn't know how to operate it. I know how and took the radio from him. I said, "Hello, operator. A police officer has been shot here." The dispatcher asked for the location. I found out the location and told the dispatcher what it was. A few minutes later an ambulance came to the scene. I helped load the officer onto the stretcher and into the ambulance. As we picked the officer up, I noticed his pistol laying on the ground under him. Someone picked the pistol up and laid it on the hood of the squad car. When the ambulance left, I took the gun and put it inside the squad car. A man took the pistol out and said, "Let's catch him." He opened the cylinder, and I saw that no rounds in it had been fired. This man then took the pistol with him and got into a cab and drove off. The police arrived and I talked to a police sergeant at the scene I told him I did not witness the shooting and after questioning me, he said it was all right for me to leave. I then went on to the Telephone Company office at Ninth and Zangs. /s/ T. F. Bowley SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN BEFORE ME THIS 2 DAY OF December A.D. 1963 /s/ Mary Rattan Notary Public, Dallas County, Texas

Great minds think ali..... Wait.

That's exactly right, David. These guys should know better by now.

Regardless of the jacket's color, why did Oswald ditch his jacket between the rooming house and the shoe store on Jefferson?

Baker had to retract his initial claim that Oswald was holding a Coke when he approached him in the lunchroom. There was never an "original claim" that Oswald was "holding a Coke". Baker never said such a thing.

No. You're not listening. Bowley approached from the east and pulled over BEFORE ever reaching Tippit's stopped patrol car. He did not pass the stopped patrol car, which he would have to do in order to end up in the 300 block of East Tenth. You're confused about something here.

Surely sounds like he parked at least a few houses away. More than two puts him west of Patton and 100 yards starts to look realistic. You have it a little backwards. Bowley approached from the east (heading west). He never would have been west of Patton at any point. "Several houses down" would still have him on Tenth Street on the same block as Tippit's stopped patrol car.

Vince Palamara. Busted! Not surprisingly busted, though.

Gary Doudna, A number of things here. First, Acquilla Clemons never makes any mention of the exchange between the two men as taking place three-fourths of the way down Patton toward Jefferson. Again, you're changing the actual story to fit a narrative you're trying to push. I notice you do this sort of thing a lot. Second, Brownlow most definitely uses "driveway" (not alley). To me, and knowing Brownlow, it is obvious that when they were concocting this hair-brained story, they said Holan told them the police car was in the driveway because they believed Holan actually lived on Tenth right across the street from the scene. Had they known that Myers was going to show (years later) that Holan actually lived pretty much halfway down Patton, their story would have never included any mention of a driveway between the two houses on Tenth. Third, Courson never says he backed up (drove in reverse) in the alley. He said it was on Tenth Street. Again, you're changing what he actually did say to fit your narrative. Any conclusion reached as a result of your studies on these matters will be entirely invalid, since you change the story of the very sources you cite.

http://jfkfiles.blogspot.com/2020/11/doris-e-holan-and-tippit-murder.html

Greg Doudna said: "Bill Brown, I have never seen you differ significantly from Myers once. You just stick with Myers on rejection of the Doris Holan story in toto, and keep missing this one too, if you like." Hey, when you're right, you're right. Greg, you're changing the entire story. Fiction is fun, right?

No. The driveway didn't go through to the alley.

I suppose you believe that not noticing any old vehicle parked out on the street is comparable to not noticing a police car in an alley. Your faulty logic never ceases to amaze me.

But that is not the claim.

You're literally changing a story for no other reason than to have it fit your narrative.