Bill Brown

The Warren Commission exhibit you are referring to, that photo was taken about six months after the assassination. Therefore, it is irrelevant to what Perry, Clark and Ables were wearing during the lineups in November of 1963.

If they weren't wearing suits then don't say they were wearing suits.

So now they're not wearing suits in the lineup?

It should be noted that Jack Tatum has the killer with his hands in his jacket pocket as he leans over talking to Tippit through the window (no hands on the patrol car).

But you have no reason to believe that it's obvious that those prints came from the killer.

At the 50:50 mark... Did McBride really say that Oswald was placed in the lineups alongside men in suits? Good grief.

You are simply trying way too hard to link those prints to Tippit's killer. There's no real reason to believe the prints belong to the killer. None whatsoever. The prints belong to the same person. No one saw the killer touch the right front fender. Therefore, other than your bias, there is no reason to believe the prints on the passenger door belong to the killer.

Both prints belong to the same person. The killer did not touch the right front fender. Therefore, there is no real reason to believe that the prints on the passenger door belong to the killer at all.

Exactly. No witness said they saw the killer touch the right front fender. Then if no one said they saw the killer touch the right front fender, why have you so adamantly included it? In fact, I would argue that since Lutz determined both prints (passenger door/window & right front fender) belonged to the same person, then it's more probable that the print on the passenger door/window didn't belong to the killer since the killer most likely never touched the right front fender.

I don't hate Oliver Stone. I'm a fan of almost all of his movies, including JFK. Let me get this straight, if I put an interview I did on YouTube and only 1,200 people watch it, am I allowed to claim that I've reached an audience of 40 million? I'm sure YouTube has 40 million visitors. Your statement was (and still is) laughable.

Who said the killer touched the right front fender of the patrol car? Maybe I've missed something.

No, I do not believe that Oliver Stone was afraid to contact Ruth Paine. That is not to say that he attempted to contact her, however.

So that's it? Either the killer or a bystander? Couldn't possibly be anyone in the parking lot at the Southwest substation? Another officer from a previous shift? A mechanic? There are literally a dozen other options that you are choosing to ignore.

Straw man. I don't think anyone has said that Oliver was scared to talk to Ruth.

Like I said, you put a disingenuous spin on it. Everyone can plainly see that for themselves. And I'm not angry. You certainly don't have that kind of power. This is real simple, just be honest. That's all.

I realize that is your point but my point is that you're wrong. There is no way you can claim that those partial prints lifted by Barnes "most certainly came from the Killer". No other way to put it other than you're spouting nonsense. You could have said that there is a chance those partial prints came from the killer. If you would have simply said that, then I wouldn't take issue with it because you would be factually correct. But that is not what you said.

You just went from "we reached an audience of 40 million" to "potentially". You don't see the difference? At least be honest when tooting your own horn.

I know Ruth personally. Do you? You know Oliver. Is that supposed to mean anything related to what we're discussing here? I was aware of some of the things you mention above but I don't see how even one bit of that is somehow supposed to automatically mean he tried to contact Ruth. As for Oliver's film crew, I have concerns about their credibility. I can elaborate if you'd like.

Point being...?

And you believe that is the only possible conclusion to be reached? I could just as easily say that he changed the name for fear of being sued since he never bothered to contact her. The difference is I am not claiming either version to be factual.

Bingo.

A disingenuous exaggeration.

They can't even spell Tippit's name correctly. It's a credibility issue.

So it's Oliver's word versus Ruth's word. Why do you automatically accept Oliver's over Ruth's? How could you possibly know? None of us could know; only the two of them.

That doesn't change a thing I said. Yes, there was enough information on the print to determine that the print was not Oswald's (as I've already said). But the prints lifted were of no value when trying to determine exactly who the prints belonged to, exactly as I've also already stated. You're making me repeat myself as if you've laid some new groundbreaking information when the reality is nothing you've posted here changes a thing that I've already said. By the way, explain how prints lifted from the passenger side of the patrol car not belonging to Oswald exonerates him from being Tippit's killer.