Jack White Posted February 22, 2010 Share Posted February 22, 2010 First, I do not make this stuff up. Check for yourself. Second, this is not a compression artifact. This is just an observation that the animators of these films made errors. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted February 22, 2010 Author Share Posted February 22, 2010 Interesting that of the seven+ logged on a few minutes ago, nobody wants to comment on this new study which has been posted nearly an hour. Nobody has even claimed parallax, or compression, nor that I am an idiot. Can nobody explain where the man in black came from, and how? I am sure that given time, they will come up with something. To me, it is another animation mistake. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Butler Posted February 23, 2010 Share Posted February 23, 2010 If ? man is in Nix then he is just hidden behind man B because Nix is standing on the ground and Bell is high up on top of a pedestal well off to Nix's left Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Haley Posted February 23, 2010 Share Posted February 23, 2010 First, I do not make this stuff up. Check for yourself.Second, this is not a compression artifact. This is just an observation that the animators of these films made errors. Jack Just had a quick look Jack. The films are taken from slightly different angles but you would expect to see something of ? man. Unless,of course, he was stood behind B & C, then stepped to the side as the car came by ? MH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Andrews Posted February 23, 2010 Share Posted February 23, 2010 (edited) What about the woman to the right of woman D? Is she in earlier Nix frames? Is there some kind of residual shading to the left of B in the Nix frame? Also, B looks like his right arm and side are cropped, cutting out MIB who was standing in front of him. Edited February 23, 2010 by David Andrews Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted February 23, 2010 Author Share Posted February 23, 2010 What about the woman to the right of woman D? Is she in earlier Nix frames?Is there some kind of residual shading to the left of B in the Nix frame? Also, B looks like his right arm and side are cropped, cutting out MIB who was standing in front of him. Thanks, David. I purposely did not mention the "woman in brown" standing in front of MAN D....hoping someone would notice "her". Good eye! More on the woman later. I just took a few hours off to watch basketball. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted February 23, 2010 Author Share Posted February 23, 2010 What about the woman to the right of woman D? Is she in earlier Nix frames?Is there some kind of residual shading to the left of B in the Nix frame? Also, B looks like his right arm and side are cropped, cutting out MIB who was standing in front of him. Thanks, David. I purposely did not mention the "woman in brown" standing in front of MAN D....hoping someone would notice "her". Good eye! More on the woman later. I just took a few hours off to watch basketball. Jack Here she is, David. I had purposely not mentioned the pinhead lady because I did not want to distract from the missing man in black. These anomalies are very clear to me. I do not understand why others cannot see them. Or pretend not to see. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted February 23, 2010 Author Share Posted February 23, 2010 (edited) Don't worry about the poor pinhead woman in Nix. Bell shows she was not even there. She probably is just a compression artifact, so I guess we should forget about her, huh? Jack Edited February 23, 2010 by Jack White Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robin Unger Posted February 23, 2010 Share Posted February 23, 2010 First, I do not make this stuff up. Check for yourself.Second, this is not a compression artifact. This is just an observation that the animators of these films made errors. Jack Muchmore Frame: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted February 23, 2010 Author Share Posted February 23, 2010 First, I do not make this stuff up. Check for yourself.Second, this is not a compression artifact. This is just an observation that the animators of these films made errors. Jack Muchmore Frame: Thanks, Robin...I have not started comparing Muchmore and Hughes in the mix yet. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Davidson Posted February 23, 2010 Share Posted February 23, 2010 Jack, Might also ask where the guy in white pants is. Should be somewhere near the missing man in black. chris Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robin Unger Posted February 23, 2010 Share Posted February 23, 2010 (edited) Bond 3 Edited February 23, 2010 by Robin Unger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Davidson Posted February 23, 2010 Share Posted February 23, 2010 Bond 3 Thanks Robin, We now have a guy in white pants. Along with 2 other men to his left, not counting the 3rd guy which we can't see in Dorman, but is in other photos/film. The nice thing about movies is the motion of human's when stabilized. Such as the 2 gentleman who salute the limo as it passes by. I suggest trying to locate this action in any of the other photos/movies. Try Muchmore first, then go onto Hughes. chris Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Davidson Posted February 23, 2010 Share Posted February 23, 2010 Hughes stabilized. chris Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Davidson Posted February 23, 2010 Share Posted February 23, 2010 Muchmore somewhat stabilized. I see 1 partial salute. chris Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now