Thomas Graves Posted December 16, 2016 Author Share Posted December 16, 2016 37 minutes ago, Chris Newton said: Jim, I was "suspicious" until I started analyzing what was actually said and now I'm convinced that, at the very least, she was an FBI Informant for FBI SA Hosty. I just posted this in a different thread but based on this reveal Hosty and Ruth Paine should have been charged with perjury (2nd Paragraph): And that means that every piece of so called "evidence" from the Paine home should be inadmissible. Chris, That "link" doesn't work, at least not for me. -- Tommy The 'link" I'm talking about said hosty1127.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Newton Posted December 16, 2016 Share Posted December 16, 2016 53 minutes ago, Thomas Graves said: The 'link" I'm talking about said hosty1127.jpg re-upped. re-linked. refresh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Graves Posted December 16, 2016 Author Share Posted December 16, 2016 (edited) 1 hour ago, Chris Newton said: Jim, I was "suspicious" until I started analyzing what was actually said and now I'm convinced that, at the very least, she was an FBI Informant for FBI SA Hosty. I just posted this in a different thread but based on this reveal Hosty and Ruth Paine should have been charged with perjury (2nd Paragraph): And that means that every piece of so called "evidence" from the Paine home should be inadmissible. Chris, That "link" doesn't work, at least not for me. -- Tommy I just posted this in a different thread but based on this reveal Hosty and Ruth Paine should have been charged with perjury (2nd Paragraph): [hosty1127.jpg] i think the Ruskies have hacked my computer. Edited December 16, 2016 by Thomas Graves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Newton Posted December 16, 2016 Share Posted December 16, 2016 Paragraph five? (Sorry I had to re-research the link lol) https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=10490#relPageId=242&tab=page Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Graves Posted December 16, 2016 Author Share Posted December 16, 2016 (edited) 2 hours ago, Chris Newton said: Jim, I was "suspicious" until I started analyzing what was actually said and now I'm convinced that, at the very least, she was an FBI Informant for FBI SA Hosty. I just posted this in a different thread but based on this reveal Hosty and Ruth Paine should have been charged with perjury (2nd Paragraph): And that means that every piece of so called "evidence" from the Paine home should be inadmissible. Chris, [...] OK, got your edit and read para 5. So, I guess November 1 doesn't quite cut it, does it, seein' as how it isn't "on or about October 27." Or is it? Kinda? -- Tommy Edited December 16, 2016 by Thomas Graves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Newton Posted December 16, 2016 Share Posted December 16, 2016 1 minute ago, Thomas Graves said: So, I guess November 1 doesn't quite cut it, seein' as how it isn't exactly "on or about October 27." Or is it? Kinda? Oct. 26, 27, more likely Monday the 28th, are all "on or about Oct 27th". Nov. 1 was the following Friday? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Graves Posted December 16, 2016 Author Share Posted December 16, 2016 2 minutes ago, Chris Newton said: Oct. 26, 27, more likely Monday the 28th, are all "on or about Oct 27th". Nov. 1 was the following Friday? Do you think Ruthie slipped something to Hosty during that visit? -- Tommy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Newton Posted December 16, 2016 Share Posted December 16, 2016 Just now, Thomas Graves said: Do you think Ruthie slipped something to Hosty during that visit? There's no way of knowing what occurred but Marina was very hostile to SA Hosty and LHO had repeatedly accused him of making threats. Was Hosty provoking something? If she was an informant it didn't necessarily begin when she returned from New Orleans. Hosty would have had a hard time explaining how he knew Marina was staying with the Paines prior to New Orleans FBI reporting the change of address. This is why this visit was buried. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pamela Brown Posted December 16, 2016 Share Posted December 16, 2016 23 hours ago, Thomas Graves said: FWIW, Monday the 11th was Veteran's Day. Edit: Maybe he asked her to mail it for him. lol -- Tommy No. Veteran's Day was November 11...https://www.jfklibrary.org/Asset-Viewer/Archives/JFKWHF-WHN10.aspx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Graves Posted December 16, 2016 Author Share Posted December 16, 2016 17 minutes ago, Pamela Brown said: No. Veteran's Day was November 11...https://www.jfklibrary.org/Asset-Viewer/Archives/JFKWHF-WHN10.aspx So we agree! -- Tommy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pamela Brown Posted December 16, 2016 Share Posted December 16, 2016 (edited) 15 minutes ago, Thomas Graves said: So we agree! -- Tommy We do agree on the day. Sorry I misread. I thought you were saying the letter was mailed on the 11th. "On November 9 someone typed a letter on a typewriter that allegedly belonged to Ruth Paine and mailed it to the Consular Division of the Embassy of the USSR in Washington, D.C.(the WC of course said Lee Harvey Oswald mailed the letter). The letter was mailed from Irving, Texas on Tuesday, November 12, and read:" Edited December 16, 2016 by Pamela Brown Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pamela Brown Posted December 16, 2016 Share Posted December 16, 2016 40 minutes ago, Chris Newton said: There's no way of knowing what occurred but Marina was very hostile to SA Hosty and LHO had repeatedly accused him of making threats. Was Hosty provoking something? If she was an informant it didn't necessarily begin when she returned from New Orleans. Hosty would have had a hard time explaining how he knew Marina was staying with the Paines prior to New Orleans FBI reporting the change of address. This is why this visit was buried. Hosty thought Marina was a sleeper agent. He said Lee wasn't smart enough to be a spy but Marina was. He called her a 'snake-in-the-grass'. Unless he was lying to me, Hosty did not like Marina. I did not have the impression that he obtained any valuable information from her. Marina could have been an informant to the KGB though... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pamela Brown Posted December 16, 2016 Share Posted December 16, 2016 52 minutes ago, Thomas Graves said: Do you think Ruthie slipped something to Hosty during that visit? -- Tommy IMO, Ruth could have helped Hosty avoid a great deal of the trouble he got himself into if she were working with him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Newton Posted December 16, 2016 Share Posted December 16, 2016 1 minute ago, Pamela Brown said: Hosty thought Marina was a sleeper agent. He said Lee wasn't smart enough to be a spy but Marina was. He called her a 'snake-in-the-grass'. Unless he was lying to me, Hosty did not like Marina. I did not have the impression that he obtained any valuable information from her. Marina could have been an informant to the KGB though... Pamela, Now that I just read your comment and mine, I think I might have given the wrong impression. I think Ruth Paine was an informant for Hosty. I haven't examined Marina's statements except to the issue of what she said in reference to the "Kostin letter". There are some statements that suggest some collusion prior to the assassination and that may be one the the next things to look at. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pamela Brown Posted December 16, 2016 Share Posted December 16, 2016 10 minutes ago, Chris Newton said: Pamela, Now that I just read your comment and mine, I think I might have given the wrong impression. I think Ruth Paine was an informant for Hosty. I haven't examined Marina's statements except to the issue of what she said in reference to the "Kostin letter". There are some statements that suggest some collusion prior to the assassination and that may be one the the next things to look at. I find that interesting, and consider seriously that Ruth was working with someone, but I don't think it was Hosty. She could have saved him a lot of grief, but, instead, she fed him to the wolves imo. And I don't find Hosty very creative. He was a black+white kind of guy. Ruth was devious, and so was Marina... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now