Pamela Brown Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 1 minute ago, Michael Clark said: Tommy, can you edit your above post to make it any more interesting, or, perhaps, "creepy"? Do you mean something such as attributing it to "Bigfoot"? :-0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Graves Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 (edited) 25 minutes ago, Michael Clark said: Tommy, can you edit your above post to make it any more interesting, or, perhaps, "creepy"? Michael, Sorry. No can do. Orders from The Deep State are orders, after all! -- Tommy Edited March 17, 2018 by Thomas Graves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Graves Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Pamela Brown said: Do you mean something such as attributing it to "Bigfoot"? :-0 LOL Good one, Pamela! I do wear size fifteen "Gordon" dress shoes by Dockers. I swear to God. Available at J. C. Penny. (Catalog order, only) 75 bucks, iirc. -- Tommy PS Good for "stompin' vermin," one would think. Edited March 17, 2018 by Thomas Graves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Clark Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 2 minutes ago, Pamela Brown said: Do you mean something such as attributing it to "Bigfoot"? :-0 Hi Pamela! I just quoted TG to see how his post would evolve. He spends hours and days tweaking his posts. I even noticed, since he has returned, that he has been editing some of his posts that are years old. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Clark Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 1 minute ago, Thomas Graves said: LOL Good one, Pamela! I do wear size fifteen "Gordon" dress shoes by Dockers. I swear to God. Available at J. C. Penny. (Catalog order, only) 75 bucks, iirc. -- Tommy PS Good for "stompin' vermin." What, Tommy, pray-tell, does this have to do wit the subject at hand? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Graves Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 (edited) 17 minutes ago, Michael Clark said: Hi Pamela! I just quoted TG to see how his post would evolve. He spends hours and days tweaking his posts. I even noticed, since he has returned, that he has been editing some of his posts that are years old. Yes, I changed my height and weight recently, among other less important things. Gasp! .... is that ... permitted? Good "catch," Michael! (You're taking screen shots to "document" all of my devious edits, I hope.) -- Tommy Edited March 17, 2018 by Thomas Graves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Graves Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 3 minutes ago, Michael Clark said: What, Tommy, pray-tell, does this have to do wit the subject at hand? "Big Foot," Michael. Probably has that name because he (or she) wears size 15 M dress shoes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Graves Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 18 minutes ago, Thomas Graves said: Michael, Do you fear that there's a ... gasp ... conspiracy afoot? -- Tommy PS Antics? What antics, Michael? PPS What are "antics," anyway? Are they something like highjinks (sp?) ? Bumped and highlighted for Michael "Big M" Clark. -- Tommy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Clark Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 Point made, I am taking Steve's advice from here-out. Tschuss! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Graves Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 20 minutes ago, Pamela Brown said: Oh no! Do you think the trolls ate it? :-0 I confess. I had my buds at NSA take care of it. -- Tommy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James DiEugenio Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 Anyway, in spite of the above, I really do hope Paul reconsiders his decision. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Graves Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 (edited) 3 minutes ago, James DiEugenio said: Anyway, in spite of the above, I really do hope Paul reconsiders his decision. Me, too, James! Really. -- Tommy Edited March 17, 2018 by Thomas Graves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Andrews Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 (edited) Paul, the place changes over time, if slowly. JFK Assassination Debate on Education Forum has beaten every other forum of its type in the past, and it will again. Whatever your dissatisfaction now (or mine), I can't think of a forum that it's not beating at the moment. I second Paul's support of David Josephs and Don Jeffries.. Edited March 18, 2018 by David Andrews Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Knight Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 The current owners of the site and the moderators as well are people who have lives outside the forum. Sometimes they don't see certain posts until they are brought to a moderator's attention. Sometimes the moderators disagree on taking certain actions. There are sometimes "back-channel" emails exchanged among the owners and moderators discussing courses of action that are taken [or are not taken]. But it's not as if some grand cabal is behind removing or suspending certain forum members. And we are human. Sometimes someone irritates a certain owner or moderator to the point that action is taken that may be hasty or overreactive. It happens. I happen to think that the majority of David Josephs' recent posts have been quite informative. But there have been a few which some mods may believe have crossed a line. The truth is, I'm not driving this bus. Then again, I'm also not the person who is making the major financial commitment to keep the forum available. Therefore, any comments I have are merely advisory, and may or may not carry any weight at any given point in time. But I sincerely hope that Paul Brancato reconsiders and stays. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Clark Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 (edited) 1 hour ago, Mark Knight said: The current owners of the site and the moderators as well are people who have lives outside the forum. Sometimes they don't see certain posts until they are brought to a moderator's attention. Sometimes the moderators disagree on taking certain actions. There are sometimes "back-channel" emails exchanged among the owners and moderators discussing courses of action that are taken [or are not taken]. But it's not as if some grand cabal is behind removing or suspending certain forum members. And we are human. Sometimes someone irritates a certain owner or moderator to the point that action is taken that may be hasty or overreactive. It happens. I happen to think that the majority of David Josephs' recent posts have been quite informative. But there have been a few which some mods may believe have crossed a line. The truth is, I'm not driving this bus. Then again, I'm also not the person who is making the major financial commitment to keep the forum available. Therefore, any comments I have are merely advisory, and may or may not carry any weight at any given point in time. But I sincerely hope that Paul Brancato reconsiders and stays. Mark, Thanks for the insight. I would ask one thing. Please don't leave somebody like Don Jeffries out of the loop. That can be disconcerting, to Don, at least. Don Jeffries shows up in the staff section of the forum. Most of all, I feel (lack of a better term, "bad?) that he does not know he stands. I know that feeling. It is a very bad feeling. Lastly, Thanks to you and your colleagues for all that you do. Cheers, Michael Edited March 17, 2018 by Michael Clark Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now