Jump to content
The Education Forum

The inevitable end result of our last 56 years


Recommended Posts

Just now, Joe Bauer said:

The huge majority of our national security and police agency people are pro-Trump. They will do what they can to obstruct investigations into their fearless leader. Everybody knows this truth.

I am certain that many of the Capital police themselves on Jan 6th were pro-Trumpers.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 18.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Benjamin Cole

    2003

  • Douglas Caddy

    1990

  • W. Niederhut

    1700

  • Steve Thomas

    1562

37 minutes ago, Ron Bulman said:

Liz Cheney promises to keep Donald Trump out of the White House | The Texas Tribune

Reagan once had a saying, something to the effect of "never criticize a fellow Republican". Liz and Mitt and a bunch of other GOP people got themselves burned badly by following that instead of keeping their house clean.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Matt Allison said:

Ben- on the actual day of the insurrection, January 6th, DC Metro Police arrested 25 people in connection with the riot, and the Capitol Police arrested 14.

It isn't possible for you to say the other 850 arrested were unarmed... because none of them were arrested until long after the event was over and thus were not searched for firearms that day.

Your statements about the insurrectionists being unarmed are therefore nothing but speculation.

Matt-

Unfortunately, the actual numbers are hard to track down.

A large clump of people were herded from the Capitol and arrested on the Capital lawns.  Of that large number (I think about 600), two were armed, including the aforementioned Christopher Alberts. No discarded firearms were found.

Another 300 1/6'ers or so have been arrested since, and one has been charged with being armed that day. 

We can say without equivocation, that at least three 1/6'ers rioters were armed. 

We can say with some certainty, due to the federal superseding indictments, that none of the 100 or so Proud Boys or Oath Keepers were armed that day.

Likely, the expression "an armed mob stormed the Capitol" is intentional sensational hyperbole. 

The 1/6 rioters almost entirely unarmed, and Capital Police stood down rather quickly.

There was also no chance at all of this mob overturning the federal government. 

As I say, the 1/6 story gets fishier and fishier, and I smell a rat! 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Matt Allison said:

They show you exactly who was arrested at or near the Capitol on the day of the insurrection, January 6th, 2021.

https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/capitol-breach-cases

This is a better link, which also shows disposition of case, and whcih also shows statement of facts, complains, etc.

Still, it is a block and tackle job to figure out the number arrested at the Capitol, on Capitol grounds, that day. 

You have a way to determine that? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ben, obviously, remains the Trumplican canary in the J6 coal mine. 

When he finally stops singing in defense of Trump's J6 coup attempt, we'll know the gig is up.

As for Ben's oft-repeated trope about needing to discern the truth about J6 through the courts, Trump's cabal of attorneys is working overtime to prevent that from happening.

Trump fighting a 'secret war' in the courts to keep witnesses from testifying (dailykos.com)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Putin annexes the territories of Luhansk, Donetsk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, he is going to have to divert resources to hold them. He may find he is overextended.

It's one thing to conquer a territory, it's another to hold it. Ask the Persians or the Romans.

Steve Thomas

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Matt Allison said:
10 hours ago, Benjamin Cole said:

A large clump of people were herded from the Capitol and arrested on the Capital lawns.  Of that large number (I think about 600), two were armed, including the aforementioned Christopher Alberts. No discarded firearms were found.

Another 300 1/6'ers or so have been arrested since, and one has been charged with being armed that day. 

We can say without equivocation, that at least three 1/6'ers rioters were armed. 

Whether there were only three armed with "traditionally acknowledged deadly

weapons" is meaningless in trying to downplay the attack.

One man with one traditionally deadly weapon alone could have killed many people.

And with dozens and even hundreds of the attackers grabbing officer's shields , their sprays and/or fencing and beating the police with these impromptu "weapons" is not considered dangerously armed?

Sticks with protest signs were also used as weapons too. 

Was pepper or bear spray found as well? Hand ties?

Your own body parts, arms, fists, legs and kicking feet are potentially very deadly weapons.

In all these physical ways the mob was hugely armed.

And when you see a horde of thousands descending upon you with rage in their faces and screaming threats like "Hang Mike Pence" "Get Nancy Pelosi" you

and then you are actually physically attacked by this crazy angry Trump slogan shouting mob... tell the injured police and life and death fearing traumatized members of our full Congress trapped inside the Capital building for 3+ hours that ...oh the attack wasn't that bad...only three of these raging, screaming threatening mad with Trump inspired hate mob were armed...so why all the fuss and crying about it?

Can't we just let this worst most violent attack on our Congress and highest democracy symbolic U.S. Government building go?

And Trump as well for watching the violent attack with glee for 3+ hours and not doing anything to stop this trauma to our entire Congress the entire time ...by his people?

And then the vomit inducing press statement just after where he called his Trump supporters mob ... "You are very special people. We feel your pain" "We love you"  ???

CRAZY!

 

The huge majority of our national security and police agency people are pro-Trump. They will do what they can to obstruct investigations into their fearless leader. Everybody knows this truth.

I am certain that many of the Capital police themselves on Jan 6th were pro-Trumpers.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whether there were only three armed with "traditionally acknowledged deadly

weapons" is meaningless in trying to downplay the attack.

One man with one traditionally deadly weapon alone could have killed many people.

However the dozens and even hundreds of the attackers grabbing officer's shields , their sprays and/or fencing and beating the police with these impromptu "weapons" is not considered dangerously armed?

Sticks with protest signs were also used as weapons too. 

Was pepper or bear spray found as well? Hand ties?

Your own body parts, arms, fists, legs and kicking feet were used and are are very deadly weapons as well.

In all these physical ways the mob was hugely armed.

And when you see a horde of thousands descending upon you with rage in their faces and screaming threats like "Hang Mike Pence" "Get Nancy Pelosi" 

and then you are actually physically attacked by this crazy angry Trump slogan shouting mob...

tell the injured police and life and death fearing traumatized members of our full Congress trapped inside the Capital building for 3+ hours that ...oh the attack wasn't that bad...only three of these raging, screaming threatening mad with Trump inspired hate mob were armed...so why all the fuss and crying about it?

Can't we just let this worst most violent attack on our Congress and highest democracy symbolic U.S. Government building go?

And Trump as well for watching the violent attack with glee for 3+ hours and not doing anything to stop this trauma to our entire Congress the entire time ...by his people?

And then the vomit inducing press statement just after where he called his Trump supporters mob ... "You are very special people. We feel your pain" "We love you"  ???

Crazy cowardly stupid down players.

 

Edited by Joe Bauer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Steve Thomas said:

If Putin annexes the territories of Luhansk, Donetsk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, he is going to have to divert resources to hold them. He may find he is overextended.

It's one thing to conquer a territory, it's another to hold it. Ask the Persians or the Romans.

Steve Thomas

Putin has started conscripting Ukrainian men in those territories to fight against Zelensky's forces. The world shall see how that works out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...