Jump to content
The Education Forum

Robert Kennedy jr. about to run for president


Recommended Posts

Broken record speaks again - you all would apparently prefer to read commentary than spend an hour with RFK jr exploring his far more nuanced position. None of you have commented on the figures I presented from the CDC on the actual continued use of mercury in vaccines, or on declining life expectancy in the US that predates Covid, or on the death rates of children ages 0-17 in the first year of the epidemic which clearly shows how reckless it was to push for vaccination of children against Covid. And how does the US compare with other nations in its success against Covid? Just how sickly is our population? What is the point of trying to win the vaccination argument here, while living in a country that continues to push disease down our collective throats? Go to RFK Jr’s website and look at what he is actually trying to do. If the science is clear to you about the success of vaccines generally or in the case of Covid, what about the science about what’s causing obesity and diabetes and other diseases which I’ve already enumerated in our children? How can you reduce RFK Jr’s lifetime of advocacy and public service to one issue? He clearly states in the one hour speech at the top of this thread that he doesn’t actually know to what extent vaccines are the culprit. He is sure, as am I, that we have a very serious problem here with overall health, mental physical and emotional, with our youth. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 143
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

2 hours ago, Paul Brancato said:

Broken record speaks again - you all would apparently prefer to read commentary than spend an hour with RFK jr exploring his far more nuanced position. None of you have commented on the figures I presented from the CDC on the actual continued use of mercury in vaccines, or on declining life expectancy in the US that predates Covid, or on the death rates of children ages 0-17 in the first year of the epidemic which clearly shows how reckless it was to push for vaccination of children against Covid. And how does the US compare with other nations in its success against Covid? Just how sickly is our population? What is the point of trying to win the vaccination argument here, while living in a country that continues to push disease down our collective throats? Go to RFK Jr’s website and look at what he is actually trying to do. If the science is clear to you about the success of vaccines generally or in the case of Covid, what about the science about what’s causing obesity and diabetes and other diseases which I’ve already enumerated in our children? How can you reduce RFK Jr’s lifetime of advocacy and public service to one issue? He clearly states in the one hour speech at the top of this thread that he doesn’t actually know to what extent vaccines are the culprit. He is sure, as am I, that we have a very serious problem here with overall health, mental physical and emotional, with our youth. 

Paul,

     As a general rule, I have always based my medical opinions and praxis on high-quality, peer-reviewed scientific data.

     What qualifications does RFK, Jr. have for giving us sound advice about infectious diseases, vaccines, obesity, diabetes, or any medical issue?  

      I have far greater confidence in the New England Journal of Medicine.

     Great leaders, like JFK, have had the wisdom to consult with, and heed the advice, of knowledgeable experts-- while asking relevant questions where doubt exists.

      That is one of the many criticisms I have had of Donald Trump since 2017.  His appointees were often poorly qualified, (e.g., Larry Kudlow and Peter Navarro as an economic advisors, Pompeo at State, etc.) and he rarely listened to sound advice about anything.

     

Edited by W. Niederhut
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  The "worst possible president" (acc. to the Daily Beast. To me he is the best president for the US) has a clear opinion regarding crypto and the sabotage of crypto by the Biden administration.

Quote:

Quote

 

Robert F. Kennedy Jr
@RobertKennedyJr
The claim that FedNow is not the first step toward a CBDC would be more easily digestible were we not aware of the Biden administration’s steady barrage of hostile broadsides against cryptocurrencies.

Between 2008-22, the Fed partnered with a handful of big banks to print $10 trillion-ten centuries of wealth in 15 years — a bonanza for the Banksters. 

Cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin give the public an escape route from the splatter zone when this bubble invariably bursts. So the White House is colluding with the banksters to keep us all trapped in the bubble of profiteering and control.

In his Feb. 8 post on Pirate Wires, Nic Carter @nic__carter  describes how the White House has organized bankers to participate in a sophisticated, widespread crackdown to destroy the crypto industry. Carter describes 15 incidents where President Biden has weaponized FDIC, OCC + DOJ to force crypto-friendly banks to close their doors to crypto firms since Dec. 3. The recent crackdown on crypto blocks exit ramps, removes alternative rails, and strengthens government control over both the financial and political systems.

We should be wary since CBDCs are the ultimate mechanisms for social surveillance and control. As Balaji Srinivasan  @balajis  says, “The distinction between FedNow and a CBDC is important from a technical standpoint, but not from a civil liberties standpoint.” Balaji compares FedNow to “a virus that has evolved to evade recognition by changing its sequence without really changing its function."

 

"They" are out to turn piece for piece of your personal islands of freedom into an intrument of controll.  

 

Edited by Karl Kinaski
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 1 year later...
On 9/13/2024 at 1:10 AM, Denny Zartman said:
On 9/10/2024 at 8:40 PM, Matt Allison said:

Exactly as we told everyone from the very beginning: A vote for RFK Jr. is a vote for Trump, and a vote for Trump is a vote for RFK Jr.

I don't remember that you told that anywhere to anybody. I remember I was playing around with the thought of Trump and JFK jr are teaming up. 17 months ago. 

Quote

 

Members

 1.3k

Gender:Male

Location:Austria, Innsbruck

Interests:HISTORY, SCIENCE FICTION, COSMOLOGY

Author Karl Kinaski 

Posted April 7, 2023

I understand that Trump is not the darling of the deep state or the Dems in power which are nothing but a deep state front. 

RFK jr. IMO means "end of deep state" or at least cut down deep state activities to an absolute minimum.

I can imagine a Trump/Kennedy ticket, which would require a swich by Kennedy from donk to phant. ( It is impossible the other way around)

 Why not ... it is all about to get rid of all those cold war dinos   hindering the progress of the US and the world ... one thing is for sure: Another "win" of the US deep state (over Trump and Kennedy for example)  would drag the world into the darkness for another 75 years ...

 

 

Edited by Karl Kinaski
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Quote Courageous Discourse™ with Dr. Peter McCullough & John Leake

Quote

 

(...)

Today’s theme is AGENCY CAPTURE—something that RFK, Jr. has been writing about for years. A couple of days ago, former CDC director Robert Redfield paid Kennedy the following compliment in an editorial he penned for Newsweek.

Quote

Kennedy is right: All three of the principal health agencies suffer from agency capture. A large portion of the FDA's budget is provided by pharmaceutical companies. NIH is cozy with biomedical and pharmaceutical companies and its scientists are allowed to collect royalties on drugs NIH licenses to pharma. And as the former director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), I know the agency can be influenced by special interest groups.

It’s a nice vindication for Kennedy and likeminded observers who have been trying to warn the citizenry about this for years.

 

(...)

Speaking of agency capture, fellow Substack author Sasha Latypova just reported the appalling news that George Watts v DOD case dismissed by federal court claiming "sovereign immunity"

For readers unfamiliar with this story—a perfect expression of President Eisenhower’s warning about the undue influence and power of the Military-Industrial Complex—the 24-year-old college student George Watts, Jr. died (autopsy confirmed) of vaccine-induced myocarditis. His family sued the Department of Defense for propagating the fraudulent claim that the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is safe. A federal court just dismissed the lawsuit under the doctrine of sovereign immunity.

In other words, when it comes to matters of so-called “public health,” injured citizens will have one hell of a time getting justice from U.S. agencies. Uncle Sam is above the law in this domain. In a contest with him, the message is clear: “Abused citizens are free to f—k off and die.”

 

 

 

FULL ARTICLE.

 

Edited by Karl Kinaski
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...