David Von Pein Posted 12 hours ago Share Posted 12 hours ago 7 minutes ago, Cliff Varnell said: That's rich coming from a guy who admits JFK's jacket collar dropped in Dealey Plaza and the jacket was only elevated "a little bit." It always comes back to the clothing for Clifford. Nothing else matters. Incredible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cliff Varnell Posted 12 hours ago Share Posted 12 hours ago Just now, David Von Pein said: It always comes back to the clothing for Clifford. Nothing else matters. Incredible. It comes down to the physical evidence in a cold case murder investigation and you've conceded JFK's jacket was only elevated "a little bit." Funny how you like to ignore your own analysis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cliff Varnell Posted 12 hours ago Share Posted 12 hours ago I stand corrected on Brennan's WC testimony. Does David have the intellectual honesty to stand corrected on the SBT? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Allison Posted 12 hours ago Share Posted 12 hours ago 26 minutes ago, Cliff Varnell said: This would be like the Democrats raffling off a Paul Pelosi hammer. That is gold, Cliff! Can I steal this quote if I give attribution? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Von Pein Posted 12 hours ago Share Posted 12 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Cliff Varnell said: I'll stand corrected on Brennan's WC testimony as long as you stand corrected on the SBT given that you admit JFK's jacket was only elevated "a little bit." Oh brother. You're a piece of work, Clifford. If anyone wants to see how I destroyed Cliff Varnell's paper-thin and extremely lousy argument concerning the "little bit" topic, go here: https://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2014/12/jfk-assassination-arguments-part-862.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Von Pein Posted 12 hours ago Share Posted 12 hours ago (edited) 3 minutes ago, Cliff Varnell said: Does David have the intellectual honesty to stand corrected on the SBT? Reprise.....Oh Brother! More defeats for Clifford can be found here: http://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/search?q=Cliff+Varnell Edited 12 hours ago by David Von Pein Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Allison Posted 12 hours ago Share Posted 12 hours ago 3 hours ago, Matt Allison said: This is a Russian state-organized effort to misinform and create a false narrative about an American assassination attempt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cliff Varnell Posted 12 hours ago Share Posted 12 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Matt Allison said: That is gold, Cliff! Can I steal this quote if I give attribution? It's yours! I gotta million of 'em! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cliff Varnell Posted 12 hours ago Share Posted 12 hours ago MAGAts, like Lone Nutters, have no self-awareness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cliff Varnell Posted 12 hours ago Share Posted 12 hours ago 36 minutes ago, David Von Pein said: Just pretend the Warren Commission testimony in my last post doesn't exist, Cliff. I've grown accustomed to such denial. Again: I stand corrected on Brennan's WC testimony. Does David Von Pein have the intellectual honesty to stand corrected on the SBT given his concession that JFK's jacket collar dropped in Dealey Plaza and therefore his jacket was elevated only "a little bit"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joseph McBride Posted 11 hours ago Share Posted 11 hours ago (edited) That's alleged to be a bullet in the photo. A Republican congressman who was a sniper in the military said in a TV interview that it is not a bullet but a vapor trail from a bullet. It is also consistent with a glass fragment. Edited 11 hours ago by Joseph McBride Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Von Pein Posted 11 hours ago Share Posted 11 hours ago (edited) 42 minutes ago, Cliff Varnell said: Does David Von Pein have the intellectual honesty to stand corrected on the SBT given his concession that JFK's jacket collar dropped in Dealey Plaza and therefore his jacket was elevated only "a little bit"? https://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2014/12/jfk-assassination-arguments-part-862.html Excerpt: "Oh, brother. Cliff Varnell thinks those previous comments I made somehow mean I can no longer believe (or in any way support) the SBT. Cliff's middle initial must be D (for "Desperation")." -- DVP; December 2014 Edited 11 hours ago by David Von Pein Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cliff Varnell Posted 11 hours ago Share Posted 11 hours ago 5 minutes ago, David Von Pein said: https://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2014/12/jfk-assassination-arguments-part-862.html Excerpt: "Oh, brother. Cliff Varnell thinks those previous comments I made somehow mean I can no longer believe (or in any way support) the SBT. Cliff's middle initial must be D (for "Desperation")." -- DVP; December 2014 Nice to see that David Von Pein acknowledges the fact that Kennedy's jacket was only elevated "a little bit." David acknowledged that a normal amount of shirt collar was visible in the Croft photo, ergo the jacket collar had dropped into a normal position at, or slightly above, the base of the neck. The SBT requires multiple inches of JFK's shirt and jacket to have elevated above the SBT in-shoot at, or slightly below, the base of the neck. David's analysis destroys that theory. That he can't admit it speaks to his massive amount of denial. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerry Down Posted 10 hours ago Share Posted 10 hours ago 29 minutes ago, Cliff Varnell said: Nice to see that David Von Pein acknowledges the fact that Kennedy's jacket was only elevated "a little bit." David acknowledged that a normal amount of shirt collar was visible in the Croft photo, ergo the jacket collar had dropped into a normal position at, or slightly above, the base of the neck. The SBT requires multiple inches of JFK's shirt and jacket to have elevated above the SBT in-shoot at, or slightly below, the base of the neck. David's analysis destroys that theory. That he can't admit it speaks to his massive amount of denial. The shirt and jacket could have crumpled up with one another in unison. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cliff Varnell Posted 10 hours ago Share Posted 10 hours ago 13 minutes ago, Gerry Down said: The shirt and jacket could have crumpled up with one another in unison. Without pushing up on the jacket collar? Multiple inches of shirt and jacket occupied the same physical space as the jacket collar? You can't demonstrate such a phenomenon -- it's contrary to the nature of reality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now