Jump to content
The Education Forum

David Josephs

Members
  • Content Count

    4,173
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by David Josephs

  1. I wonder what they think was so "pertinent" ??
  2. Pretty sure they are talking about this... I've done some searching and cannot find the handwritten version... yet DJ
  3. FWIW Lt. Ben McCoy is credited with calling up the RESERVES the DPD requested... Lt. McCoy reported to Captain ARNETT Mr. GRIFFIN. Do you remember who gave you these instructions that you are talking about? Mr. ARNETT. It seems like it was Captain Lawrence, but I couldn't swear to that, but it's---- Mr. GRIFFIN. And you are employed with the Dallas Police Department, is that right? Mr. ARNETT. No. I am a captain on the reserve. Mr. GRIFFIN. Now, will you explain what the difference is between the reserve and the police department? Mr. ARNETT. Yes sir. Reserves were established about 10 or 11 years ago, to assist in, say, tornadoes or, you know, something that came up that they needed more help in to be trained on that. We don't draw any pay from the Dallas Police Department at all. Mr. GRIFFIN. Who does pay you? Mr. . ARNETT. Nobody. Mr. GRIFFIN. This is a completely voluntary thing on your part? Mr. ARNETT. Yes, sir. So Croy unilaterally decides to just "Go Home" Mr. GRIFFIN. Were you at the scene when Tippit was there? Mr. CROY. Yes. Mr. GRIFFIN. Unassigned? Mr. CROY. Yes. He doesn't seem to know what or where he was... lol Mr. GRIFFIN. Were you in a patrol car Mr. CROY. No; I was on foot. Mr. GRIFFIN. Were you in uniform? Mr. CROY. In uniform. Mr. GRIFFIN. Where were you at the time President Kennedy was shot? Mr. CROY. Sitting in my car at the city hall. Mr. GRIFFIN. Now, after the Tippit--how long did you remain at the scene of the Tippit killing? Mr. CROY. Oh, I would say a good 30 minutes. Thirty or forty minutes, something like that. Mr. GRIFFIN. Then where did you go? Mr. CROY. Home. I went to eat. Mr. CROY. Well, I didn't go home. I went to eat. Mr. GRIFFIN. Where did you go to eat? Mr. CROY. Austin Barbecue. https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=1137#relPageId=509&tab=page LAWRENCE EXH #2 is the list of assignments for Nov 22... There is plenty of info on CROY for the 24th... but not the 22nd. He is listed here yet this is related to Oswald and the 24th... Croy's affidavit does not mention any activities from the 22nd.. despite his testimony claiming he was downtown, at the Tippit scene, at the Texas Theater and eats at Austin's... How many coincidences can there be?
  4. David Josephs

    The vanishing pool of blood

    Then pointing them out in Moorman should be easy.... they should be as obvious as the man standing in that spot at the bottom left of this graphic... but I don’t see them in Moorman I see trees and leaves and sky...
  5. David Josephs

    Ice bullets

  6. This is simply not a true account of from where the man was coming... yet at some p[oint the man turns back towards the east and walks away from Tippit's car... Given Tippit could have stopped anywhere... is it pure coincidence he's on the same street where he's known as "Friendly" so many miles from his patrol area? The same driveway where his mistress lives? Tatum is also the only one to talk about the shot to the head... shot #4. how anyone else there misses this is beyond me. The real timing problem they do not discuss is getting Oswald from 1026 Beckley to 404 E 10th in 5 minutes... can't be done. Or countering Butch Burroughs selling Oswald popcorn at his theater prior to 1:10... Tatum does not see the 2 men until the shooter is at the car... by then he was walking east but as Markham said, the police car caught up to him as IT traveled East... Scoggins tells us from which direction the man was coming. From all telling of it... it seems this person was walking WEST in from DENVER St. S. Ewing is even a few streets further EAST than Denver/Patton.... LEE was seen at this barber show virtually around the corner from RUBY and down the street from Harry & Kay Olsen (ex Ruby Stripper and DPD cop with injured leg) The FBI tries to make it sound like 10th and S Ewing is "some distance" and reiterates how Oswald lived on BECKLEY... what they don't say is that RUBY lived at 223 S Ewing.... Mr. SCOGGINS. I noticed he stopped down there, and I wasn't paying too much attention to the man, you see, just used to see him every day, but then I kind of looked down the street, saw this, someone, that looked to me like he was going west, now, I couldn't exactly say whether he was going west or was in the process of turning around, but he was facing west when I saw him.
  7. ...as Oswald’s clearly DIDN’T Jim... Benavides did not identify Oswald... and in fact the hair description that it was squared off and not tapered.... is what may have gotten his brother killed... mistaken identity.. look here, the hair tapers off.. is not cleanly cut not squared off... I haven’t seen the back of Vaganov’s head
  8. Tramps on the arrest reports were Gedney, Abrahms and Doyle... And it was CHAMBERS who initially filled out these Arrest Reports... 'cept he don't remember it that way Daniel Wayne Douglas - wasn't he the man, top row 2nd from left?
  9. Yes, I did... thx... Since I'm visually oriented for the best retention of memory... I write these things out which in turn solidifies it in my memory... DJ FWIW As I did for the Bethesda players and their connections At the top here is the JCS (which I should now add ACIS) I tried to follow the players along Military Lines... Army, Navy, AF, Marines (still part of the AF?) and then within Bethesda who was above who.... The 6:45 arrival time from HUMES... and the 7:17 empty casket entrance with Sibert/O'Neill Greer and Kellerman... just screams at me...
  10. David Josephs

    I understand why people hate conspiracies

    Mr. Payette... So many like yourself come here to test the waters of their insanity. It has become painfully obvious that you argue for the pure joy of it... like so many self-delusional wanna-be "great" legal minds. Show off that Big Brain of yours... If you actually had a legal mind you would make convincing arguments in support of your positions instead of waxing philosophical over terms you invent. Ok, let's take a look at this "contribution"... A total of 4 threads started by Mr. Payette Since 2015... the last one in Dec '17... the first 2 in 2015 got a total of 2 replies (both of them yours) this first one sure seems to suggest you think Oswald was involved in a Conspiracy Your wrote this - Posted September 23, 2015 "Even if there had been no JFK assassination, the entire no-problem defection, marriage to the mysterious Marina ("This was no ordinary Russian girl," as my wife says), and no-problem return to the U.S. was so bizarre and near-inexplicable that it would be enough in itself to tell us LHO was involved in something much larger than himself" You also mention your wife worked at the same factory in Minsk... followed by the post clarifying - "2 years after he left"... real helpful Lance! On March 8, 2016 you start a thread and in 3 pages of replies, you are involved in only 1 of them... Since your initial view, you seem to have had a change of heart in 6 months I’ve been struck by what a high percentage of those in the JFK assassination research community who accept the assassination as an elaborate conspiracy also seem to have left or far-left political leanings. Some of the best minds in JFK research addressed your comment yet you go running off, tail between your legs... Well done. And Finally, to prove my point about this being purely a poor excuse for a way to pass your time, you start your last thread with: I feel sure this has been discussed to death here, but for my own amusement I decided to take a look at yet another Harvey & Lee claim, to wit (from the H&L website): You then go on to show off how your big brain hasn't the first clue on how to approach the subject matter, or the people working with it... It is interesting that you choose one of the few conclusions within H&L that I do not support. The real fact the records were heavily altered does not change the reality of who went where, when. Is it normal for lawyers of your caliber to offer conclusions without doing any of the work involved... or is that just you? And then, since you haven't the ability to sway any of the jury here judging your offerings, it must be a cognitive problem related to how people understand conspiracies. What a joke. Looking thru these threads - you simply don't have the stick-too-it-ness to remain in a debate once you see you can't win the day or sway anyone's thoughts... but then again, you're only here for your OWN AMUSEMENT... And the best for last... just a few hours ago: As someone who practiced law for more than 35 years, 95% civil but about 5% criminal (prosecution), I really don't believe it is helpful to attempt to introduce evidentiary rules or burdens of proof into an Internet discussion. Reasonable inferences from the evidence are always permitted. Now, why in the world would things like EVIDENTIARY RULES, or BURDENS OF PROOF be worth a bucket of warm spit here on the ole Ed Forum? Oh, right, cause Oswald never stood trial and the evidence we discuss needs some basis for acceptance as REAL and AUTHENTICATED evidence.... Whereas your level of acceptance is "Reasonable inference" ... ------- So here are 2 reasonable inferences from the evidence I'd like you to address with that Big Brain... Oswald was being watched by FBI, US Postal Service, CIA and who knows who else... A report on Oswald was filed on April 21 in fact... that he sent a letter and gotten letters from NY's FPCC. Reasonable inference - if Oswald was to receive a rifle and pistol in the mail at his PO Box, the US Postal Service and/or the FBI would be aware of said purchase and note it accordingly as they did with all the other Oswald reporting that was done in 1963 Why is there not a single report - or even cursory mention - of Oswald picking up a 5' carton with a rifle in it (or going to REA for the pistol), bringing it home (somehow), cleaning and practicing with it.... between receipt of said rifle on March 27, 1963 and the discover over November 22/23, 1963 that their man Oswald had indeed purchased this rifle in the name of A Hidell at Oswald's PO Box? == The other concerns the Summary Reports from MX City CIA station related to LIENVOY phone conversations with the Soviet compound in MX, of interest. Reasonable inference - if Oswald was in Mexico City making phone calls to the Soviets on Sept 27th and 28th, the monthly summary report for Sept would discuss the implications of such a visit... Why is there no mention at all of an American on the phone to the Soviet Military Attache AND the Embassy... in the summary report from Oct 8th, the day David Atlee Phillips begins his new position as Chief of the Cuban Desk in MX City.... Yet there is plenty of evidence of calls and travel etc... after the fact So you see Lance, "Reasonable Inference" and the JFK assassination are oxymoronic... the evidence was produced AFTER NOV 22 in such a way as to establish Oswald's guilt, yet it remained impossible to retrofit contemporaneous reporting to match manufactured conclusion... Have fun...
  11. David Josephs

    I understand why people hate conspiracies

    “Much of someone's real character lies in what they don't say about themselves.” “Self-praise is the first sign of insecurity.” "A fool flatters himself, a wise man flatters the fool." And you've done such a fine job applying these attributes too... And therein lies the problem Lance.... but I'm sure your big brain will have no problem following... A THEORY is either PROVEN true or not... BELIEFS are "accepted as true" despite there being no evidence to support them... You BELIEVE that LHO killed JFK despite numerous investigations' inability to prove so... and one of them concluding the death was the result of a conspiracy... (oops) You, "accept as true" the belief LHO is guilty despite the evidence for such conclusion being not only woefully inadequate but provably wrong. So really, all you need do in your little proof is to get Oswald to his rifle in the bag where he stowed it that morning.... .... to the window, assembled and sighted and ready to fire when all the public information puts him there.... You never wonder why, if JFK is expected at the Trade Mart at 12:15, and passing by the TSBD 5-10 mins before that, our little shooter is not even up put on the 6th floor until after 12:15? You see Lance, since you can't PROVE anything, theories like the Silly Bullet go UNPROVEN and therefore live in the world of BELIEF inside your head... It is truly a sad state when highly intelligent people like yourself are so easily fooled by simple propaganda and sleight of hand...
  12. David Josephs

    I understand why people hate conspiracies

    Over and over, ... and over again... Vietnam was not escalated to prevent the spread of communism but to foster the rise of the USA & SE Asia as the center for Heroin production in the world.. 40 years later we did the same exact thing with Afghanistan... and the Taliban leaders ... all to maintain control over the world drug supply... President Roosevelt (FDR) provoked the attack, knew about it in advance and covered up his failure to warn the Hawaiian commanders. FDR needed the attack to sucker Hitler to declare war, since the public and Congress were overwhelmingly against entering the war in Europe. It was his backdoor to war. FDR blinded the commanders at Pearl Harbor and set them up by - denying intelligence to Hawaii (HI) on Nov 27, misleading the commanders into thinking negotiations with Japan were continuing to prevent them from realizing the war was on having false information sent to HI about the location of the Japanese carrier fleet. And most recently, try this experiment related to motion and physics: Take an aluminum airplane sitting on the ground, and drop a 100 story steel-framed and reinforced building on it at 500mph... We going find a squished plane.... or will the plane be mostly intact but now on the inside of this building? What does happen when a softer object hits a harder one?
  13. David Josephs

    I understand why people hate conspiracies

    There were a number of authors who Dulles saw as instrumental in our understanding of our world role... During the 50's and 60's the WORLD seemed to be running spy operations in every hot bed city... The CIA tried and became good at killing foreign leaders and/or influencing policy... But for a few fateful months in 1963 this world wide organization of "policy makers" STOPPED what they were doing to watch an amazingly connected man shoot and kill JFK all by his little self... or that's the story we've been SOLD... For those of the LNer ilk here... no item of evidence designed to establish Oswald's guilt has ever been offered which can authenticated as REAL EVIDENCE... the challenge remains in place to this day... LNers.. offer up AND AUTHENTICATE any item of evidence in the entire case... good luck Real evidence may be authenticated in three ways--by identification of a unique object, by identification of an object that has been made unique, and by establishing a chain of custody. You only have to be able to use one of these ways, though it is prudent to prepare to use an alternate method in case the court is not satisfied with the one you have chosen. The easiest and usually the least troublesome way to authenticate real evidence is by the testimony of a witness who can identify a unique object in court. For example, the curator of a museum may be able to testify that he is familiar with, say, Picasso's "Dames de Avignon" and that what has been marked as exhibit so-and-so is in fact that unfortunate painting. It is important to remember, however, that many more mundane objects may be amenable to this kind of identification. A unique contract, or one that has been signed, may be authenticated by a person who is familiar with the document or its signatures. A ring may have an inscription by which it can be identified. Even a manufactured object, like a wallet, may be identifiable by its owner after years of use have given it a unique personality. The second method--identification in court of an object that has been made unique, is extremely useful since it sometimes allows a lawyer or client to avoid the pitfalls of proving a chain of custody by exercising some forethought. If a witness who can establish an object's relevance to the case marks it with his signature, initials, or another mark that will allow him to testify that he can tell it from all other objects of its kind, that witness will be allowed to identify the object in court and thus to authenticate it. Often, if a member of the lawyer's staff or another person early in the chain of custody marks the evidence, big problems can be avoided if a later link in the chain turns out to be missing. The third and least desirable way to authenticate real evidence is by establishing a chain of custody. Establishing a chain of custody requires that the whereabouts of the evidence at all times since the evidence was involved in the events at issue be established by competent testimony. ====== Yes... the entirety of US history and politics is about SELLING THE LIE AS TRUTH TO THE BEWILDERED HERDS All of these books/papers are available in PDF... For a true picture of the history of control exercised on the world's population by those with the means.. I can't recommend these enough. How We Advertised America, Propaganda, Modern Corp (highly recommended to understand the consolidation of wealth over the last 80 years) and the paper which becomes the impetus for Military PsyOps... Paddock's Psych and Unconventional....
  14. Some thoughts on that.... Known members of the 488th include: Jack Crichton, Lumpkin, Revill, Gannaway, Westbrook, Brandstetter, Jack Earnest Likely members of the 488th include: Boise B Smith, Gerald Hill (transferred to WESTBROOK as Oswald was hired in October), Don Stringfellow Likely assets of the 488th include: George de Mohrenschildt (interesting note on Lumpkin: he was Frank Brandstetter's commanding officer during the war) The FBI trained members of police forces across the US.. as well as kept close tabs on their assets within these departments... There also appears to be some serious connections to the WACKENHUT CORP of Florida
  15. David Josephs

    The shot to TIPPIT's head

    TATUM: Next. this man with a gun in his hand ran toward the back of the squad car, but instead of running away he stepped into the street and shot the police officer who was lying in the street Bowley says that he turns Tippit over as he was face down Clayton says he was covered with a ROYAL BLUE COAT which he removed How does one shoot a man thru the temple, front to back, if he's face down? And why does no one else corroborate these movements? It had to happen right in front of Markham, Holan, the Wrights, the Davis', Benavidas, Scoggins... etc... Mr. BELIN - How many shots did you hear all told? Mr. BENAVIDES - I heard three shots. Mr. BELIN. How many shots did you hear? Mr. SCOGGINS. Three or four, in the neighborhood. They was fast. Mr. BELIN. They were fast shots? Mr. SCOGGINS. Yes; they were fast. ELBERT AUSTIN, 8317 Fourth Avenue, Dallas, advised that on the afternoon of November 22, 1963, he was working on a construction job at the intersection of Tenth and Denver Street, Dallas, Texas. He advised he was a brick mason's helper and was assisting in the construction of an apartment house. Me stated sometime after 1:00 PM he was on a scaffold in front of the aforementioned apartment house when he heard approximately two or three shots JIMMY EARL BURT, General Delivery stated that on November 22, 1963 he was living at 505 E. 10th Street, Dallas, Texas which is the residence of his father—in—law, DAVID SHAEFER. He and a friend WILLIAM SMITH were sitting in his brother, BILLY BURT's house located at the corner of 9th and Denver Streets, Dallas. It was some time after lunch when they heard two gunshots. He and SMITH immediately ran from the house toward his car, a 1952 two—tone blue Ford which was parked facing south on Denver Street. As they ran from the house they heard four more shots making a total of six. Mr. BALL. What did you hear at that time? Mr. CALLAWAY. I heard what sounded to me like five pistol shots. Mr. BALL. Five pistol shots? Mr. CALLAWAY. Five shots, yes, sir. FRANK CIMINO, 403 East Tenth Street, Apartment 7, Dallas, Texas, advised that on November 22, 1963, he was residing in an apartment at 405 East Tenth Street. He Stated that at around 1 p.m. he was at his apartment listening to the radio. He heard four loud noises which sounded like shots and then he heard a women scream. The officer was lying on his side with his head in front of the left front head light of his car. His gun was out of the holster and lying by his side Mr. DULLES. Plural? How many did you hear? Mrs. DAVIS. Just two, they were pretty close together. (both sisters say the same thing) Mr. BALL. How many? Mr. GUINYARD. I heard three. FRANCIS KINNETH, 1425 Caidwell, Dallas, Texas, advised he was employed on a construction job at the intersection of Denver and Tenth Street, Dallas, on the afternoon of November 22, 1963. He advised at approximately 1:00 PM he had heard approximately two or three shots L. J. LEWIS, 7616 Hums, Pleasant Grove, Texas, advised he is presently self-employed as a wholesale car dealer. LEWIS advised that on the afternoon of November 22, 1963, he was on the used car lot of Johnny Reynolds Used Cars together with HAROLD RUSSELL and PAT PATTERSON, during which time they heard approximately three or four gun shots coming from the vicinity of Tenth and Patton Avenue, Dallas, Texas Mr. LIEBELER. How many shots did you hear? Mr.REYNOLDS. I really have no idea, to be honest with you. I would say four or five or six. I just would have no idea. Mr. JACK RAY TATUM : I heard three shots in rapid (illegible)I went right through the intersection, stopped my car and turned to look back. I then saw the officer lying on the street and saw this young white man standing near the front of the squad car. Next. this man with a gun in his hand ran toward the back of the squad car, but instead of running away he stepped into the street and shot the police officer who was lying in the street. When the shooting began C. Frank Wright was sitting in his living room at 501 E. 10th, close to Jimmy Burt's father-in-law (505 E. 10th), watching television with his wife. As soon as he heard shots Wright jumped up and went outside while his wife called the police. Mary Wright said, "I ran to the telephone .... .! didn't look in the book or anything. I ran to the telephone, picked it up and dialed '0.' I said, 'Call the police, a man's been shot!"' Wright looked west from his porch and saw a police car near 10h & Patton. He watched as the assailant stood over the slain police officer before leaving.
  16. David Josephs

    The shot to TIPPIT's head

    Follow me aloing for a minute.... A lot has been written about the shells at the Tippit scene being described as AUTOMATICS by Hill 1:34 550/2 (Sgt. G.L. Hill) The shells at the scene indicate that the suspect is armed with an automatic 38, rather than a pistol. and the comment back was how do the shells get so far away from the body if auto shells that eject after firing... that they HAD to be regualr shells that the killer emptied and threw here and there... My point? No one testifies to this person kneeling down to pick up these shells... How is it that we know the killer(s) didn't do that? I ask because the killer also went around to Tippit laying on the ground and shot him in the head... at quite an interesting angle.... yet the witnesses say no such thing.... Aren't Markham and Benavidas and SCoggins the BEST of the Tippit witnesses? Yet not one of them sees this final shot? [/color] Mr. BENAVIDES - Then I heard the other two shots (DJ: so we have the first TWO SHOTS and these OTHER TWO SHOTS) and I looked up and the Policeman was in, he seemed like he kind of stumbled and fell. Mr. BELIN - Did you see the Policeman as he fell? Mr. BENAVIDES - Yes, sir. Mr. BELIN - What else did you see? Mr. BENAVIDES - Then I seen the man turn and walk back to the sidewalk and go on the sidewalk and he walked maybe 5 foot and then kind of stalled. He didn't exactly stop. And he threw one shell and must have took five or six more steps and threw the other shell up, and then he kind of stepped up to a pretty good trot going around the corner. Mr. BELIN. How many shots did you hear? Mr. SCOGGINS. Three or four, in the neighborhood. They was fast. LIKE AN AUTOMATIC WEAPON?? Mr. BELIN. They were fast shots? Mr. SCOGGINS. Yes; they were fast. Mr. BELIN. Then what did you do or say or hear? Mr. SCOGGINS. Then I saw the man falling, grab his stomach and fall. Mr. BELIN. Which man did you see fall? Mr. SCOGGINS. The policeman. I was excited when I heard them shots, and I started to get out-- since we went back over there the other day and reenacted that scene, I must have seen him fall as I was getting out of my cab, because I got out of the cab, and in the process of getting out of the cab I seen this guy coming around, so I got out of sight. I started to cross the street, but I seen I didn't have enough time to cross the street before he got down there, so I got back behind the cab, and as he cut across that yard I heard him running into some bushes, and I looked up and seen him going south on Patton and then when I jumped back in my cab I called my dispatcher. Mr. BALL. How many shots did you hear? Mrs. MARKHAM. Three. Mr. BALL. What did you see the policeman do? Mrs. MARKHAM. He fell to the ground, and his cap went a little ways out on the street. Mr. BALL. What did the man do? Mrs. MARKHAM. The man, he just walked calmly, fooling with his gun. Mr. BALL. Toward what direction did he walk? Mrs. MARKHAM. Come back towards me, turned around, and went back. Mr. BALL. Toward Patton? Mrs. MARKHAM. Yes, sir; towards Patton. He didn't run. It just didn't scare him to death. He didn't run. When he saw me he looked at me, stared at me. I put my hands over my face like this, closed my eyes. I gradually opened my fingers like this, and 1 opened my eyes, and when I did he started off in kind of a little trot. Mr. BALL. Which way? Mrs. MARKHAM. Sir? Mr. BALL. Which way? Mrs. MARKHAM. Towards Jefferson, right across that way. Tippit autopsy report Can ANYONE provide PROOF, that Tippit was shot in the head at 10th and Patton... according to this FBI report... Dr. Liguori does not mention a headwound at all and bullets are removed in the ambulance, at Methodist AND at Parkland??? We KNOW he was shot in the head.... Why didn't anybody see it? How is it possible that these three BEST WITNESSES do not recall an execution style shot to the head? and to bring this full circle... Seems very likely then that if they missed what is assumed to have happened BEFORE the killer runs away, they would easily have missed him picking up the shells....
  17. Another few strange details with Bowley... He worked for Ruby for 5-7 years in the 50's. Ruby may have even bailed him out of Biz trouble Bowley claims he had to turn Tippit over and that there was little if any blood... (despite his being shot twice in the chest and once in the right temple) If Bowley turned him over, Tatum's story of the shooter coming around the BACK of the patrol car to shoot him in the head seems to be in conflict... how do you shoot someone from front to back in the temple, exiting at the rear back of the head, do so with him face down? Finally, the strange journey of Bowley, with his 12 year old daughter in the car.... He picks her up at R L Thornton Elementary and is going to meet his wife working at the phone company at Zangs and 9th... In his 1977 statement, he says he goes north on Marsalis and turns left onto 10th... and that's when he "happens" into the shooting aftermath... except 10th didn't go thru to Beckley or Zangs, 9th does. Why in the world would he turn on 10th at 1:08pm when one more block and then a left takes him to his wife's door... this is a map showing the route from the elementary school to 9th and Zangs... w/o the freeways... Just makes little sense to me... any help/thoughts is appreciated https://www.google.com/maps/dir/Robert+L.+Thornton+Elementary+School,+6011+Old+Ox+Rd,+Dallas,+TX+75241/North+Zang+Boulevard+%26+West+9th+Street,+Dallas,+TX/@32.7106672,-96.8293479,14.25z/data=!4m16!4m15!1m5!1m1!1s0x864e9703e0d2f927:0xdf82cc0fa719c718!2m2!1d-96.7973521!2d32.6746196!1m5!1m1!1s0x864e998ffc56e3ff:0xba7c56337459f186!2m2!1d-96.8245075!2d32.746359!2m1!1b1!3e0
  18. The 6'4" Michael Paine would be an interesting stretch as a double for little Harvey... Here are some other options though: (not sure on the Wayne name)
  19. David Josephs

    Tippit, Oswald, and the Dobbs House

    Alot of what you seek is in H&L already.... yet there were 2 or 3 others who fit the Ozzie-lookalike bill who it could have been.. For those not like us who look at his face daily, these other men resembled him enough to fool a casual observer. With Harvey at work, and Lee having been seen with Ruby on and off all summer, my bet would be on Lee. Alan Felde and ce1962 is the first example of overt evidence of the 2 men in the same places at different times.
  20. David Josephs

    Tippit, Oswald, and the Dobbs House

    MC... JCS is in Dallas. Alba’s garage was where Harvey read hunting and rifle mags... coffee processing?
  21. David Josephs

    Tippit, Oswald, and the Dobbs House

    Yes, fiction... He was at Odio and in Dallas all that week. They reverse engineered the journey with a few scant pieces of evidence provided to the FBI by their asset at the dept of immigration in the Gobernacion. Harvey Cash in Nuevo Laredo was instrumental. The Aussie girls and MacFarlane were on Del Norte all the way to MX... While interesting, I don't think there's much of a connection... There was only 1 bus leaving Houston that worked in the timeline getting him to MX ... So Ozzie must have been on it... To arrive at 10:30am and be at the Cuban Embassy by 10:37
×