Karl Kinaski

John List 1st: John Demjanjuk.. Crime: 1943... Trial 2010...John D

A very good idea, indeed! Let some nameable JVB hostile Interviewer cross swords with Judyth. I am sure she will masterly get out of the affair. The question is: would the enemies of JVB risk such a defeat? KK

No. And I appreciate her big mouth! There are too many chickens out there, especially regarding to this never ending murder case. History would be looking very different, if there had been more Judyths in the last 47 years. KK

If I understand your argumentation correctly, than that means the limo sequence was inserted into an background (and maybe foreground), which is two seconds in the past. Or the other way around: compared to the background the limo is two seconds in the future... If this is true, than that would be a big breakthrough... KK

xxx

xxx

xxx

xxx

I would rather use a polygraph(and maybe sodium-pentathol and LSD)) to sound out McAdams, Barb and Viklund... KK

I am sorry: but the phenomenon of parallax occurs no matter, if you move a camera sideways, or if you just turn it. The absence of this natural law in the Zapruder film remains an oddity... KK Ok. lets assume the entrance pupil moved...lets say 2 inches....how much movement of wall compared to the lamp post would we expect to see Karl? Precise measurements would have to be made locally... But look at C Davidsons GiF post #10...there one can SEE that firewall-lamppost movement...it should be visible in the Z-film too...but it is not... KK

I am sorry: but the phenomenon of parallax occurs no matter, if you move a camera sideways, or if you just turn it. The absence of this natural law in the Zapruder film remains an oddity... KK

edit

edit

Is it your belief, that all those people where fooled by Harvy posing as Lee Oswald in NOLA in the summer 1963? JVB Mary Shermann Alton Ochsner Clay Shaw David Ferrie Carlos Bringuier Ed Butler Kerry Thornley Carlos Marcello John Quigley FBI The Murrets William Reily Delphin Roberts Richard Chase Nagell etc etc Check out this: I love McAdams for this... Armstrongs book debunked

edit

I am laughing hysterically. I love your reaction. I can't catch my breath. Kathy C Paying for a very entertaining, long and exiting thread and a good show---why not? Whether you re a JVB believer or not, LN or CT:pay for it, if you enjoyed it. This Thread was one of my daily highlights the last two months. I wanna thank you all for that. I fear this will not happen again for quite some time... And I ve learned something too: JVB and Haslam are right and the Armstrong book is bullxxxx. KK

May I join here? What about the photographed LHO in Mexico-City, outside the (cuban, soviet?) embassy? What about the LHO at the Ford-salesman NOLA 20.1.1961? What about the Oswald at the Lincoln-Mercury-Shop at Dealy Plaza? The other Ossi in the Texas Theater? The Oswald in the cuban consulate in NOLA Sep. 63? The Ossi at the Shooting ranch in Dallas? JVB knew the one and only real Oswald, who was surrounded by imposters, which didn't even look like him! (I am talking about the pic of the Mexico-city Ossi...)...call it ID-Charade... Armstrong is wrong, by claiming there where only two of them... KK

xxx

In reading the Lancer thread there are a few initial concerns. 1) He was held as a prisoner of war by Japan. As this would not have been the E.T.O, I wonder how familiar he was with a Mauser. 2) The comment that he identified it by the scope. Almost any scope can be mounted to almost any rifle. This would seem a less than conclusive method of identification. Weitzman wasn't the only one there. Roger Craig identified it as a Mauser. Eugene Boone identified it as a Mauser. Weitzman did. Fritz was there. Henry Wade passed this information onto reporters quite certain that it was a Mauser. And then for the next 2 days it was reported as a Mauser. Did none of these people read what was stamped on the rifle and thereby leaving themselves open to making such a monstrous and monumental mistake? Craig stuck to his guns and was haunted for the rest of his life. Weitzman didn't stick to his guns and seemed to be haunted for the rest of his life. Looks like catch .22 or should that be catch 7.65? Let's not mention the Enfield 303...BWF. This one stretches credulity way past the point of breaking... You mean in much the same way that the news gives incorrect info today? You do realize this all could have begun with one person making an off the cuff errant identification? I do not believe for one minute there was a Mauser up there. As Bernice already stated, why write it in a sworn affidavit then? Surely, if you hadn't seen it properly, the correct language would have been to write "...I saw what appeared to be a 7.65 Mauser" or "...I saw a rifle that I thought to be a 7.65 Mauser" or "...after catching a glimpse of the rifle I assumed it to be a 7.65 Mauser" or "...upon inspecting the weapon my initial impression was that it was a 7.65 Mauser" Instead, Weitzman wrote "IT WAS A 7.65 MAUSER" - it doesn't get much clearer than that Mike. You miss my point on the media aspect of this case. The media reported what the DPD and the District Attorney told them. This "misidentification" could have had a massive impact upon any future prosecution of Oswald. Weitzmann not only identified the rifle he identified the scope on it too. (And very accurate). Which was an completely other type than the Carac. scope... KK

In reading the Lancer thread there are a few initial concerns. 1) He was held as a prisoner of war by Japan. As this would not have been the E.T.O, I wonder how familiar he was with a Mauser. 2) The comment that he identified it by the scope. Almost any scope can be mounted to almost any rifle. This would seem a less than conclusive method of identification. Weitzman wasn't the only one there. Roger Craig identified it as a Mauser. Eugene Boone identified it as a Mauser. Weitzman did. Fritz was there. Henry Wade passed this information onto reporters quite certain that it was a Mauser. And then for the next 2 days it was reported as a Mauser. Did none of these people read what was stamped on the rifle and thereby leaving themselves open to making such a monstrous and monumental mistake? Craig stuck to his guns and was haunted for the rest of his life. Weitzman didn't stick to his guns and seemed to be haunted for the rest of his life. Looks like catch .22 or should that be catch 7.65? Let's not mention the Enfield 303...BWF. This one stretches credulity way past the point of breaking... You mean in much the same way that the news gives incorrect info today? You do realize this all could have begun with one person making an off the cuff errant identification? I do not believe for one minute there was a Mauser up there. Than be happy with it... KK

Is that Clip part of the 1967 CBS-JFK-Disinfo TV-Series with Dan the Rat Rather? Something Tom Hanks wanna copy in the near future? KK

WHITE & JACK? KK

Gary I am not sure, what you mean. Do you got another explanation, for following an object with a camera than by panning the head with the camera? Zapruder was hardly stepping sideways like Fred Astaire... Karl

From Inside The ARRB, Volume V by Doug Horne: Governor John Connally Repeatedly Lied About, and Misrepresented, the Origins of the Texas Trip After President Kennedy's Assassination. The above is a sub-heading at the top of page 1385. Horne discusses some of the same issues raised by David Lifton. In fact, he credits Lifton for many of the newspaper leads and some other important information on Congressman Al Thomas. Much has been made of Horne's research into the medical evidence. Volume V deals with "The Setup -- Planning the Texas Trip and the Dallas Motorcade" and "Inconvenient Truths," a detailed study of the running battle President Kennedy had with key figures in the Military and Intelligence agencies over Cold War foreign policy. Horne borrows heavily from other researchers in making his case for a military-inspired coup. Both Lifton and Horne's understanding of President Kennedy's murder extend well beyond the medical evidence coverup. Despite his blurred memory about the circumstances of the Texas Trip, Connally remains the main anti-single-bullet-theory-witness. It was his TV-interview in the summer of 1964 which leads to the discord within the WC, and the famous phone call Russell-LBJ, (Sep. 64) in which both men admit, that they do not believe in the SBT. KK