Dean Hagerman

To all,

A few of my friends have alerted me that Maggie Hansen/Magda Hassan or whatever her name is has mentioned my name on the DPF a couple of times

in the thread about Peter Lemkin's removal.

Therefore, I am now going to mention some important points concerning the issue since Maggie/Magda carefully edited them out in her post. (Surprise surprise!!).

1. It was Peter who contacted me about the recent problems he was having on the Education Forum, not the other way around.

2. It was Peter who apologized to me (in his emails dated 10.03.2010 and 11.03.2010), repeatedly, about the email he sent me several months ago that read "cyber sex" in the subject line.

3. He was also the one who emailed me and told me that the message in question was meant to be a joke, and he did that not after he sent it to me but after the issue was brought up here on the EF by Jack White.

4. It was also Peter himself who asked me to contact the admins and tell them there had been a misunderstanding.

5. The claim that he was removed because of a complaint I made months ago is ridiculous. If that were the case, he would have been removed long ago.

Having said that, the people (either here or on the DPF) who have been desperately hunting down a scapegoat can look elsewhere and stop bothering me. Or better, mind their own business.

Edited to add : I also sent a copy of this message to Maggie/Magda and asked her to post it on the DPF for me. I'm not keeping my hopes high, though.

I dont believe anything you say

Duncan is correct, the interview is real

You can also tell because the actor who played Rowland in JFK looks nothing like the Rowland that Duncan posted a pic of and link to the interview

Go back and watch the sceen of Costner in the court room and says "Arnold Rowlnad saw....." and it shows the actor playing Rowland in black and white pointing to the TSBD

Wow me and Barb posted the same thing at the same exact time (Roy/Blackburst research on Ferrie)

Reading back through some old JVB postings on this forum, I noted that

for all the CHRONOLOGY in her "book" she relied on someone named David

Blackburst to provide all the research. Yet we are told repeatedly that her

story is told WITHOUT consulting JFK research materials. Is "Blackburst" a

paid researcher?

I find this interesting.

Jack

PS...I decided to google David Blackburst, and discovered that he is AKA

(also known as) STEVEN ROY.

ATTENTION STEVEN ROY, Forum Member:

Did you provide research for Judyth Baker? Are you also known as David Blackburst?

Thanks.

Jack

Jack

The Stephen Roy on this forum is writing a book on David Ferrie, and I believe that most of his research centers around Ferrie/Shaw and N.O.

This is a very interesting observation Jack, could Roy be the person feeding Judyth all of his research which she in turn is using as facts?

This is outrageous!

I feel the same way

The fact that the sexual harrasment claims NEVER happened and yet Peter is still not reinstated makes no sense at all

This woman lied, I say that her name be made public so she has to defend her lies, just like Peter had to defend her false claims

I am very upset at how Peter has been treated and have offered him my help in whatever way he may need it

What happened to Peter was WRONG

Why is the topic that I started locked?

?

Why is the topic that I started locked?

If you don’t like it, you are free to join Peter on his Deep Politics Forum.

Wow

Very well said both Jim and Robert

I made this thread for one reason, because what happened to Peter is wrong and I will back him up no matter what happens

If he is no longer allowed a voice on this forum I will pass on his words

Andy told me that Peter has not been banned and his IP has not been blocked

However I have recieved an Email from Peter telling me that he has been blocked!

When the PM first came through I only got it in my Email Inbox, and my PM inbox on the forum has no trace of the PM that Peter sent to me

Why has this been done to him?

Why was I told his IP was not blocked?

Is this a misunderstanding?

Or is it worse?

Im going to stand up for Peter because this is wrong if it is true

Can someone tell us what is going on?

We already know that the accusations against Peter were not true, for those of you that missed the threads that were taken down

thankyou Dean,this sketch was made by tosh i think 93ish he said...this along with all the others south knoll i believe I posted in Tosh's other thread for any wanting to know I have been lugging them around for years from one pc to another they come in useful at times when he's in town... the others are all ..re the shot from the south side sewer area.and south side....I just had a quick look i think they may be in this thread..i usually mark them Dean sometimes of course i slip,duh some i just know...stay well...btw send me your email ad..ta....b

I see now

The problem is that I just had your name and Tosh for the name of this file, so I didnt know who it came from (i.e Tom Wilson or someone else)

I will PM you my email

Take care Bernice

Dean

peter PULEEEEEZE FIND IF POSSIBLE AND POST ANY OF TOM'S SCETCHES....TO MY KNOWLEDGE I DO NOT HAVE THEM I MUST HAVE BEEN OCCUPIED ELSEWHERE AT THE TIME AND MISSED THE OPPORTUNITY OR I CERTAINLY WOULD HAVE APPRECIATIVELY SNAGGLED THEM...THANKYOU BOTH ... have a good day...best b

Maybe Tosh will now think that I post more then just Bull S*it according to him in one of the deleted Peter Lemkin threads

Bernice im not sure if this was the scetch you were looking for but I hope it is

When I save pictures I try and put the name of the person who the picture came from and according to this scetch I got this picture from you over a year ago

If you want the full size scetch I can email it to you, I think I have your email address in my PM inbox

Dean

Jim

I have not gotten an email reply or a reply in this thread of my question that I asked Judyth

Did she get the question that you forwarded to her?

Thanks

Dean

This just made my heart drop

I am very glad that I got to get to know Rich and be a part of his forum as many of you have

RIP Rich

I will miss you and try my best to live up to your drive in researching the assassination

Email sent Jim

Judyth are you ready for my questions?

I know you are reading this thread

Nice to see you here Greg!

I really like reading your thoughts on JFKresearch.com and look forward to your posts on this forum as well

Dean

Whether he was circumcised

I know this is not in good taste, but I have ALL of LHOs autopsy photos

If Judyth could answer this question and maybe some more about LHOs anatomy then I would be willing to look into her claims

I do not like asking these type of personal questions but they could really help to either prove or disprove Judyths claims

Jim if Judyth is willing to answer a few questions I will ask her through you

Dean

Ask her why she changed her story about when she first met Oswald at the post office

You know the crazy bit about thanking him in Russian on accident because she was learning how to speak it at the time

She just happened to thank him in Russian when he spoke Russian himself and Judyth did not

She changed her story when researchers jumped all over her absured "first" meeting with Oswald

I would love to hear why she changed her story

Jim please dont think im jumping on you because I respect everything you have ever done, but this part of Judyths story that she changed is one of the many reasons I dont believe her

Dean

You are a fan. Your thoughts are rarely your own.

Oh really?

Looks to me like you dont read any threads if you think im just a fan

Your a real tough guy saying I have no thoughts on the assassination from behind your keyboard, make you feel good to try and cut me down? You have not a clue of who I am

I have never seen a post from you that spells out your thoughts or theories

Maybe you should search through my posts and read them before you open your mouth and make a stupid comment

I hope I do ruin this forum for you, I hope you get so mad that you never post again, from the looks of it you never post anyways, and when you do its to complain

Im willing to bet I know more about the assassination then you could ever dream of knowing

Its to bad your from Northern California, you make me look bad

Go make another thread complaining about a forum that you never post on

First we have a post about how we all need to stop debating

Now we have a post that we all need to stop talking about the photos/films

Whats next?

Should all of us who debate about the films and photos just quit the forum so posters like Tom and Justin wont be distracted?

If you dont like it DONT READ OR LOOK AT IT!

You are either with us or against us. It is that simple.

Then im against you/them

I dont believe one word Judyth Baker says

Message from Gary Mack:

I'm confused. It's apparently OK for Oliver Stone to distort JFK history, but not Joel Surnow?

Gary Mack

Great post Doug

I agree that there was a shot through the windshield

I also agree that what we see in Altgens (The Spiral Nebula) is the through and through hole