B. A. Copeland

I hear you there and couldn’t agree more. Wait....Solie is one of THE most fascinating players in the entire drama in my opinion. What is your source for his being in control of files for Paine and Webster? The guy is someone, like Morales (for example) that deserves much more attention, especially regarding the info Newman dig up not too long ago on Nosenko and how close Solie seemed to be to him.

(Thanks Stan!) Lets dismantle further shall we?

Jeff Morley also touches upon this in his book on Angleton. Always nice to have, what Doug Valentine calls a "broader historical view". Thanks for the info so far.

I am truly enjoying the analysis on this topic.

Rob Clark newest episode relating to Mexico City with Savastano 👍 Ep. 163 ~ Mexico City Clusterf*ck w/ Carmine Savastano

Excellent timing Barto! I'll also post Doug's newest show here on Harvey: #168~ February 21, 2020: "William Harvey, The CIA, And ZR/RIFLE: Further Study & Analysis."

Vince the significant aspect about those photos is that, we now know, thanks to the historical record, that Bobby and Jackie both believed JFK was murdered by domestic opponents and related this (via Bill Walton) to the Russians. Those photos are fascinating however....I mean the same car? If not for these photos (and they are indeed the vehicle JFK was shot in) I’d never believe Bobby would do it...maybe it’s a case of doing what you need to do politically and strategically as a means to a political end similar to Bobby also publicly endorsing the WC when the message to the Russians clearly contradicts the WC’s conclusion.

Ohhh Simpich is definitely not been on the sidelines as of this post 🤣👍🏻. I absolutely love that clip Bart, classic video meme.

Thanks.

What’s going on Steve lol? Hope all is well man.

Given the testimony, Lee's alibi (destroyed by the DPD and others), connecting the evidentiary dots (testimony of witnesses, federal and local personnel notes, timing, etc), the most plausible explanation of who that is, is more likely than not, Lee Harvey Oswald. Either way, I personally believe that any researcher concerned with this case should seek and seek well to learn who that is standing there, regardless of what one believes.

Are we more certain than not that there is a masked man or is "masked" more descriptive (or what it looks/seems like) than declarative (what it is or you actually believe it to be)? What the....hmm....

Huge thanks to BartoBlunt again and again.

Hey Barto! So here’s the link to QH Episode 7: https://www.spreaker.com/user/7338953/quick-hits-7-jfk-assassination-research-

Ah I understand and thanks for clarifying. I'd say that it also depends on what you yourself take to be "extraordinary". Dr Craig may have implied that winning the lottery would itself (or could) be categorized as an extraordinary event given the odds? (I could be wrong). His writing on the subject matter (written form): https://www.reasonablefaith.org/writings/question-answer/do-extraordinary-events-require-extraordinary-evidence/ To quote his concluding thoughts on the matter:

Ah, thanks Barto 😄.

Carl Sagan wisely said that “extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.” I believe that is a commonly mistaken understanding concerning evidence: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5HgRWvqf-wM

Steve unfortunately I cannot understand your counterargument and would enjoy it if I could read it. Your response to Ed is a crazy mashup of a facebook discussion I'm assuming? Sorry, maybe its the way this forum processes facebook discussions, etc. I'd also be very interested for anyone who espouses the lone nut theory explain Mexico City and Lee's voice not being the voice that the FBI heard.

Bit of official info on Grayston: http://www.warofwits.net/author.html

You'd certainly know that Jim 😄.

Operation Ajax provides an excellent geopolitical context concerning the Cold War and, some might successfully argue, indirectly relates to Kennedy’s administration in many ways. This is an upcoming film that looks significantly more relevant than Argo...I am pretty sure JimD will be waiting for this with interest and I expect that K&K will probably have an in depth review shortly after the films release 😎.

Jim correct me if I'm wrong but I think another equally important question is, what was the evidence that Lee actually lived there. If the evidence is genuine it should probably pan out moreso than not. Ed's case is that the evidence doesn't pan out and he's made a strong case against the official story (again the millionth time, we have the official story being challenged viciously with evidence). It is possible that Lee living there bolsters the lone assassin theory moreso than his not living there, but thats just my musing on the matter.

What the living hell.......

Welcome and no worries Ron. Interestingly enough David, Campbell did a very, very interesting show back in March 2019 titled: "The Dealey Plaza Shadow Op: Hijacking CIA Black Operations." Fascinating as, it seems to me that Doug has given strong evidence of a 'legitimate' hijacking of a CIA operation by Army Intel. Definitely worth listening to.

Good grief.....I cannot imagine the individuals who prayed that Lee would never have a chance to testify in a Court of Law...