Micah Mileto

Does Matt Douthit think that anything is being done about the hard drive?

The Archive.org version of Weisberg's archive has more files than jfk.hood.edu! I don't know what else is different, but it's different.

Who actually wrote the report of a "bronze-colored plastic casket"? There's no name signed on the page in question, just a squiggle I can't make out. People seem to think it's from Dr. Kemp Clark, perhaps in the wrong order of pages. As Harold Weisberg explained in some of his personal notes, "...There is also a typed document (report 516-8), not in Clark's "own hand" about which there is some mystery. It is, in fact, not dated. It is signed. The third page is numbered 2 and the second page which appears to be the first is numbered 1. The first page is not complete and is less than a half page in length with the word "Statement" written in a neat hand in the upper right. The rest of the sheet has been out off and the reproduction shows only the part of the page with the typing. It seems to be in a different typing than the other two pages. It is this part which begins with the statement that the President arrived at exactly 12:43 p.m.. The second page has a heading, "Summary". This also is one of the cases the time of 12:43 wasn't changed to 12:38, important if the tenuous Oswald time reconstruction isn't to be destroyed. Elsewhere ( ) it is indicated that this cut-off sheet of typing was a letter addressed to the President's doctor". http://jfk.hood.edu/Collection/Weisberg Subject Index Files/C Disk/Clark William Kemp/Item 01.pdf https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=946#relPageId=540 https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=1134#relPageId=27

In this 5/26/1991 phone call between Livingstone and Weisberg, at around the 30 minute park, Livingstone again reveals his belief that Groden is totally "handled" by David Lifton https://drive.google.com/file/d/12tQ06VEXyKPkluO3PWC3wT1xtb8dCfQB/view

Full link here http://jfk.hood.edu/Collection/Weisberg Subject Index Files/D Disk/Dallas Conspiracy/Item 02.pdf

The ground zero rubble does not show such messy cuts, as would be expected from the columns being melted straight through with thermite. The "slices" seen on some photos appears to be from the thermal lances of ground zero workers. Ordinary thermine can not heat or melt through a skyscraper column in a fraction of a second, even one pre-weakened with demo work, and it can not create timed explosions to explain all of the "squibs" which are allegedly bombs or blasting caps instead of ordinary air pressure. One possible way to have quieter explosives would be to somehow pre-heat a column in a fraction of a second could be taken out with a kicker charge planted on the weld point, but I am not aware of any technology that could heat such thick steel so fast. The sound problem probably can't all be explained away with pre-9/11 demo work.

See this on the foreknowledge of 7's collapse: https://old.reddit.com/r/911truth/comments/6zcttx/of_course_wtc_7_fell_from_fires_the_firefighters/ Also, In the current model of the official story on 7, the debris from WTC 1 didn't actually cause enough structural damage for it to be a large factor in the collapse, besides the starting of fires and breaking of windows. Office fires alone allegedly weakened the steel structure, but since we know there was functional intact fireproofing on these columns (unlike the Twin Towers), the government blamed low-heat thermal expansion of girders, rather than regular high-heat "weakening" of steel. The demolition side of the argument also needs to demonstrate that such a demolition device is possible, one that shows big white explosions and breaks apart skyscraper columns despite not being nearly as loud as commercial explosives.

Has any Japanese-speaking buff ever even tried searching through old newspapers? Online or physical?

Weisberg conspired to send Livingstone to a mental hospital. Weisberg is especially evil for trying to add that detail, to what could have been a simple phone call to the Police. And even then, I think that some forms of threats and harassment should be legal. Every political ideology is violent, and civility is a two-player game of pretend.

I don't care. It wasn't worth it. Weisberg should be remembered as a bad person. Although I should add that I also despise people who peruse legal action over slander or intellectual property violations, two more things that I think should be legal.

Livingstone alleged that Robert Groden falsely accused him of being a convicted child molester: https://archive.org/details/nsia-LivingstoneHarrisonEdward/nsia-LivingstoneHarrisonEdward/Livingstone Harrison Edward 168/mode/2up

Also, Livingstone had apparently identified himself as a victim of modern psychiatry, and wrote a (now rare) anti-psychiatry book called Cry of the Invisible. Weisberg knew this.

Can anybody who knows about Harold Weisberg explain this letter he wrote? https://archive.org/details/nsia-LivingstoneHarrisonEdward/nsia-LivingstoneHarrisonEdward/Livingstone Harrison Edward 150/ I do believe Weisberg was openly plotting to get Livingtone sent to a mental hospital just for (basically) claiming to be tight with law enforcement. If this is the correct interpretation of this letter, then I feel like I have no choice but to say that Weisberg was an unforgivably bad person.

Does he still think Jeffrey Epstein was no big deal?

https://archive.org/details/nsia-LivingstoneHarrisonEdward/nsia-LivingstoneHarrisonEdward/Livingstone Harrison Edward 079/page/n1/mode/2up [...] They made the pics to make things easier if evidence had to be produced to buttress the official investigation of one assassin. They made mistakes in that, perhaps even deliberately. Making them incompatible and showing them privately to many people years ago let the smart money know that everything was in control, and where the plot came from. My family is one of the hundred most powerful in the world, and I can tell you that that is how it works. This country has a long history of faking evidence [...] What is Livingstone talking about here? Why was Livingstone living in an ice shack and complaining about being broke, if his family was "one of the hundred most powerful in the world"?

https://archive.org/details/nsia-LivingstoneHarrisonEdward/nsia-LivingstoneHarrisonEdward/Livingstone Harrison Edward 070/ Harold Weisberg claims in this letter that Humes burning the notes was against the official regulations of the Navy. Can't find anything CTR+F'ing through the 1960 Navy autopsy manual on archive.org. More study is needed.

What is this about the military shooting cows from fighter jets, and the squirrels sabotaging them? Is "laser" combat just a computer test where nothing is actually fired?

Can somebody explain some of this 10/11/1988 letter from Livingstone to Weisberg? https://archive.org/details/nsia-LivingstoneHarrisonEdward/nsia-LivingstoneHarrisonEdward/Livingstone Harrison Edward 054/mode/2up [...] I was often writing in the woods living in a tent or bare shelted without even heat in winter, and certainly no library. I lived in a car for years. [...] Once I went to Dallas and Earl Goz arranged for me to spend the night with a hoody guy who said he was a medical photgrapher at one of the hospitals there. I went home with him and he took out a revolver and put it on the table and sat there all night talking at me. I was dogged tired and very afraid but tried to pretend nothing was wrong. I finally laid down about 4 AM and pretended to sleep. I had no sleep that night. [...] [...] I experienced many threats along the way but it never detered me either. Two weeks ago I was assaulted outside my house and I believe I would have been killed had not my screams for the police brought them. I am badly battered now, and worried that I may have permanent damage to my kidney or back. I was repeatedly kicked as I lay on the ground. He was much bigger than me, and had been sitting outside my house for months. He looked like a cop to me and I felt like I was being surveilled. This had a bad effect on me and came just as one more deal with the book fell through, creating great dispair in me. I left the next day for my cousin's place in Greenwich, where she took care of me. I have no medical care. I've had a lot of violence and threats. Once I was going to speak on the radio in San Francisco and men called the station right up to air time and tried to stop it. We could see them outside with walky talkies all up and down the street. Cubans. They had approached me at a book fair there in the previous days and threatened me. Not long after that a federal employee whom I knew very well tried to blow up my car with me in it. I had worked with him in the Forest Service in Big Sur, and he had been a Navy Seal. That forest was surrounded by a big military reservation and I imagine he was under cover in the FS watching things, as they were conducting laser experiments there, shooting cows from airplanes, etc. The squirrels got them back and undermined their battlefield so badly that it screwed up operations. One could see the writing on the wall in terms of competence, when they couldn't handle that. I have had a terrible year trying to get this book out. I had two acute anxiety blocks today when I couldn't handle things. Groden caused one of them. He really can do nothing to get the book out, so I have to do it all. He has paniced me in the past. Got me into trouble, in fact. But we all have faults. In 1971 my publisher told me "You will never be published again. We can play pretty rough." I never got over it, and they not only prevented me from going on with my career and developing as an author, but they ruined my life. Many things were done to me. I went quite crazy. There were many beatings. Much violence. I thought that had ended when I came here, but now it has started again. I became my own worst enemy too, and it has been a nightmare. I have a three volume work called The Nightmare, which is about all of this, though it is very rough. Since writing the above, I learned that the Canadian publisher I first spoke to about the book in 1982, will publish it as best as they can, by January. When it happens, I'll believe it.

Weisberg's letter response to Livingstone's letter about threats/intimidation/sabotage: https://archive.org/details/nsia-LivingstoneHarrisonEdward/nsia-LivingstoneHarrisonEdward/Livingstone Harrison Edward 053/

Lifton went back and edited some of his old comments, like above.

Livingstone said in a letter to Harold Weisberg dated 7/1/1991 “I have had a total nightmare with many things going on:...”, “...Year after year of hostile action up to and including an attempt to blow up my car by a federal employee whom I worked with. I have lived with fear, often great illness, and terror most of my life” (Harold Weisberg Archive, jfk.hood.edu/Collection/Weisberg Subject Index Files/L Disk/Livingstone Harrison Edward/Item 007).

http://jfk.hood.edu/Collection/Weisberg Subject Index Files/L Disk/Livingstone Harrison Edward States Attorney/Item 12.pdf https://archive.org/details/nsia-LivingstoneHarrisonEdward/nsia-LivingstoneHarrisonEdward/Livingstone Harrison Edward 152/ Weisberg made a list of quotes from Livingstone's letters where he makes statements suggesting he was heavily involved with government authorities. Here's one of the angry letters from Harrison Livingstone saying "I am the police": https://archive.org/details/nsia-LivingstoneHarrisonEdward/nsia-LivingstoneHarrisonEdward/Livingstone Harrison Edward 146/mode/2up And in a letter from Livingstone to Weisberg, he tried accusing David Lifton of being some kind of "agent", adding that Robert Groden also believed that about Lifton: https://archive.org/details/nsia-LivingstoneHarrisonEdward/nsia-LivingstoneHarrisonEdward/Livingstone Harrison Edward 119/mode/2up

From a 8/8/1988 letter by Harrison Livingstone to Harold Weisberg: http://jfk.hood.edu/Collection/Weisberg Subject Index Files/L Disk/Livingstone Harrison Edward/Item 093.pdf (Link 2: https://archive.org/details/nsia-LivingstoneHarrisonEdward/nsia-LivingstoneHarrisonEdward/Livingstone Harrison Edward 049/, link 3: https://archive.org/details/nsia-LivingstoneHarrisonEdward/nsia-LivingstoneHarrisonEdward/Livingstone Harrison Edward 050/) Some very high levels of the Canadian government may be involved in our project, as a full time federal employee has worked full time on our project for months, and the original contact came from someone working for the Prime Minister's Office. I even suspect that the Queen may be involved. Certainly Harvard had a hand in all of this now. They paid for all of my work and got me to write the book, ever since I talked to the doctors in Dallas [notation: "in 1979."] The queen? What is Livingstone talking about here? Right now I'm trying to do a read-through of every document on Harrison Livingstone in the Harold Weisberg Archives.

A really great model would have the option to see them as shirtless and maybe also as skeletons - maybe with the suit "Faded" underneath it.

As we know from the testimony of Parkland doctors Malcolm Perry and William Kemp Clark, there were press conferences at Parkland every day for a few days after the assassination, in addition to the infamous conference on the day. Clark participated in each of these conferences. There are known transcript of the later-day conferences, and news reporting was sparse for some reason. It seems to me that either quotes from the first conference are sometimes wrongly attributed to the later conferences, or for some reason the Parkland doctors used almost identical language in each of their interactions with journalist. In the 2011 ebook edition of the 1991 book Act of Treason by Mark North, we find this reference: New York Times: “Dr. Kemp Clark . . . chief of neurology at Parkland Hospital . . . said that there were two wounds, a traumatic wound in the back of the head and a small entrance wound below the Adam’s apple. . . . The head wound could have been caused by an emerging bullet, Dr. Clark said, or it could have been a tangential wound. He said that the wound was ‘large with a considerable loss of tissue.’”117 [...] Corresponding to that citation, we find: 117 New York Times, 11/24/63, p. 2 Likewise, in Vince Palamara's 2015 book From Parkland to Bethesda, we find: New York Times, 11/24/63---“Dr. Kemp Clark…said that there were two wounds, a traumatic wound in the back of the head and a small entrance wound below the Adam’s apple…He said the [head] wound was ‘large with a considerable loss of tissue’” [...] Here is page 2 of a copy of the 11/24/1963 New York Times: https://i.imgur.com/8cNzBKf.png https://i.imgur.com/sj5h1xw.png The quote in question does not appear. The only two things close are both on page 5. Here they are: https://i.imgur.com/40EWqQo.png https://i.imgur.com/Pi1sfmg.png https://i.imgur.com/nZQTilW.png I also tried searching the keywords on Google, jfk.hood.edu, and newspapers.com, and I cannot find where this exact phrasing was used. So it would seem like the book "Act of Treason" had a wrong reference which was spread.