Micah Mileto

I don't know if this is copium or not, but it really does seem unlikely that the margin of error on Connally could account for the Single Bullet Theory being possible. The trajectory shows a multiple inch difference, not just a couple centimeters.

We need more close-up views of the fade job. From the video we have now, I have a hard time differentiating between the clothing, shadows, and the interior of the car.

https://i.imgur.com/eJcykr6.mp4

How is a shooter going to tell which one was JFK by staying far back from the window?

patspeer.com has a comprehensive inventory showing the prevalence of these "pow powpow" statements.

Plan c : if multiple shooters are proven, blame it on a small conspiracy rather than a big one.

But how would the gunman know which one of the entourage was JFK? Unless some kind of live communication was involved, a gunman might need to use a scope to spot which exact person was John.

Here is the square logic behind multiple shooters: Maybe Plan A was to have Kennedy be killed by a single shot from behind, but that didn't work, so Plan B was to use overkill to make sure Kennedy was dead and then worry about a cover-up later.

Fragments from other guns were never found????? There are about as many stories and theories of extra bullets/fragments/shell casings found as the RFK assassination case.

I can't really be sure, but from seeing the part of the video where it fades between the model and frame 225 of the Zapruder film, I can't help but think that there seems to be some pixels of discrepancy between Connally's shoulders.

On the subject of censorship, there are only two positions which are honest and logically consistent: the belief in free speech extremism, or the belief that literally all opinions except for your own should be censored. The tiniest difference in political policy could kill or displace thousands of people, so if one does not expressly value liberty over security, there will ALWAYS be an important-sounding reason to justify censorship. People have a hard time understanding that no two sets of opinions are alike. For an example, imagine two people who agree on almost everything about World War 2, but person A believes that the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were justified, while person B thinks that only the bombing of Hiroshima was justified but not Nagasaki. From person B's perspective, is person A not supporting the murder of hundreds of children? And aren't both supporting mass child murder from the perspective of somebody who thinks that neither bombing was justified? Is the violent death of hundreds of children not on the same level of importance as other kinds of speech deemed too "violent", "slanderous", or "hateful"? See, any attempt to defend a non-free-speech-extremist system falls apart.

Okay? Fine, it isn't worth getting jail involved anyway. How can you justify jail for taking something that is not scarce?

So? Don't try to sell ice to Inuit individuals.

The product attempting to be sold can be duplicated times infinity. You are saying that those who take one of these infinite copies should experience violence in the form of jail or the threat of jail. Sorry, you're not going to convince me that's fair. Stealing is when you take something from somebody else and that person doesn't have that thing anymore - piracy is different. Your outlook on this issue seems to rely on the expectation of profit, and I am saying that nobody should have any expectation to make a profit when trying to sell something that is not scarce. Home and office space is scarce, digital files are not. The creator's profit is not worth others' negative rights against authority figures forcing their will onto them.

Boo. Abolish intellectual property.

BTW Pat, have you ever considered the possibility of a single shooter from behind using an automatic rifle that alternated between firing high-velocity and low-velocity ammunition?

225.

https://jfkfacts.substack.com/p/welcome-to-the-dealey-plaza-metaverse This article from September 2022 is behind a paywall.

cool find

If you believe in psychology pseudoscience, what is your opinion on the idea that psychology is just a scam designed to make people feel ashamed of themselves?

Could one argue that the law is being broken by not digging up the grave at Arlington for another autopsy?

Are you sure Thuoy and Calloway can't be the same person?

Trust me, I know. I'm about to release 400 pages on the tracheostomy. You know about the chest tube incisions right above JFK's nipples, right? And how the Parkland witnesses all insisted that the chest tubes were inserted all the way into the pleural cavity, while the Bethesda pathologists claimed the incisions were only superficial and the pleura was totally intact?

Is Sharon Thuoy Sharon Calloway? https://jfk.emuseum.com/objects/21462/sharon-calloway-oral-history?ctx=f11e088c207c7ffb8ed89774e3af0625bf2b4f12&idx=0

I love the part when Allen Dulles walks into Dr. Humes' testimony late, and when Humes was describing the chest tube incisions made at Parkland, Dulles asks "Are you describing exit wounds?", to which Humes replies "Sir, these are knife wounds".