Micah Mileto

Shires and/or Price were probably responsible for the early "left temple" newspaper reports. Shires/Price had access to the Parkland reports, but did not actually see the body.

Kenneth Salyer, Richard Dulaney, and Lawrence Klein died in 2020, Drs. Seldin and McClelland died in 2018. Dr. Robert Schorlemer is still alive too. So, it's Dr. Ronald Jones, Dr. Donald Teel Curtis, Dr. Lito Porto, Dr. Joe D. Goldstrich, Dr. Peter Loeb, and Nurse Phyllis Hall, Dr. Robert Schorlemer, and maybe Salomon Ben-Israel (formerly Dr. Gene Akin). Has anybody tried to contact Dr. Donald Teel Curtis?

I know of still (probably) living witnesses to Kennedy's wounds - Dr. Ronald Jones, Dr. Donald Teel Curtis, Dr. Lito Porto, Dr. Joe D. Goldstrich, Dr. Peter Loeb, and Nurse Phyllis Hall. Maybe Salomon Ben-Israel (formerly Dr. Gene Akin). Hard to find information on the other Nurses. So many started passing away, ironically, after Palamara released his "complete" assassination compendium on who was living or dead.

What does Meyers say about the torn $1 bill?

Thanks

https://www.worthpoint.com/worthopedia/malcolm-perry-signed-jfk-fdc-kennedy-1874928248

https://www.flickr.com/photos/spcouta/10999406294 also https://www.worthpoint.com/worthopedia/malcolm-perry-signed-jfk-fdc-kennedy-1874928248

Bill Miller passed away a while ago, just noticed now

Where did you identify such a microphone? Gary Mack said there were never-before-digitized photos of the conference where there weren't any microphones visible.

REST IN PEACE!

His Church Committee testimony is missing, but what isn't missing is the report on his first interview for the Church Committee, and the transcript of his interview by the HSCA. No mention of a gun coming out. I feel like he's a clown, but if he's a clown, he must have had some huge cojones to tell such lies to government people.

So, there's no record of Gochenaur ever saying the part about Moore pulling out the gun until 2020? He didn't say that at the 2018 CAPA conference.

It's harder to find this guy than an upload of The Man Who Killed Kennedy with the audio in sync!

Hot stuff to come.

It didn't go into the dummy wrist, but it did go through two ribs instead of just one.

Nice one.

Although Parkland Drs. Malcolm Perry and Robert McClelland told the Warren Commission about cutting through the strap muscles on the front of Kennedy’s neck (WC Vol. 6, p. 30, McClelland's 3/21/1964 testimony [text]; WC Vol. 6, p. 7, Perry’s 3/25/1964 testimony [text]; WC Vol. 3, p. 366, Perry's 3/30/1964 testimony [text]), the Bethesda pathologists failed to make any known statements that describe finding a surgical defect on the strap muscles, such as scalpel cuts. The pathologists did, however, describe bruising on the strap muscles. They officially concluded that the bruising was caused by the nearby exiting bullet (WC Vol. 17, p. 30, CE 397, handwritten autopsy protocol; WC D 77, typed autopsy protocol [text]; WC Vol. 2, p. 347, Dr. Humes' WC testimony, 3/16/1964 [text]), although they were not totally clear on when they began to realize the defect in the throat was a former bullet hole. According to a report by Arlen Specter on a 3/11/1964 meeting with Humes, Boswell, and witness Admiral Calvin Galloway, “...Dr. Humes and Dr. Boswell further said that it was their current opinions that the bullet passed in between two major muscle strands in the President's back and continued on a downward flight and exited through his throat. They noted, at the time of the autopsy, some bruising of the internal parts of the President's body in the area but tended to attribute that to the tracheotomy at that time…” (Specter, 3/12/1964, Interview of Autopsy Surgeons [page 1] [page 2]). But, in Humes’ testimony to the Warren Commission, he said “...We examined in the region of this incised surgical wound which was the tracheotomy wound and we saw that there was some bruising of the muscles of the neck in the depths of this wound as well as laceration or defect in the trachea. At this point, of course, I am unable to say how much of the defect in the trachea was made by the knife of the surgeon, and how much of the defect was made by the missile wound. That would have to be ascertained from the surgeon who actually did the tracheotomy. There was, however, some ecchymosis or contusion, of the muscles of the right anterior neck inferiorly, without, however, any disruption of the muscles or any significant tearing of the muscles. The muscles in this area of the body run roughly, as you see as he depicted them here. We have removed some of them for a point I will make in a moment, but it is our opinion that the missile traversed the neck and slid between these muscles and other vital structures with a course in the neck such as the carotid artery, the jugular vein and other structures because there was no massive hemmorhage or other massive injury in this portion of the neck...”, “...When examining the wounds in the base of the President's neck anteriorly, the region of the tracheotomy performed at Parkland Hospital, we noted and we noted in our record, some contusion and bruising of the muscles of the neck of the President. We noted that at the time of the postmortem examination. Now, we also made note of the types of wounds which I mentioned to you before in this testimony on the chest which were going to be used by the doctors there to place chest tubes. They also made other wounds. one on the left arm, and a wound on the ankle of the President with the idea of administering intravenous. blood and other fluids in hope of replacing the blood which the President had lost from his extensive wounds. Those wounds showed no evidence of bruising or contusion or physical violence, which made us reach the conclusion that they were performed during the agonal moments of the late president, and when the circulation was, in essence, very seriously embarrassed, if not nonfunctional. So that these wounds, the wound of the chest and the wound of the arm and of the ankle were performed about the same time as the tracheotomy wound because only a very few moments of time elapsed when all this was going on. So, therefore, we reached the conclusion that the damage to these muscles on the anterior neck just below this wound were received at approximately the same time that the wound here on the top of the pleural cavity was, while the President still lived and while his heart and lungs were operating in such a fashion to permit him to have a bruise in the vicinity, because that he did have in these strap muscles in the neck, but he didn't have in the areas of the other incisions that were made at Parkland Hospital. So we feel that, had this missile not made its path in that fashion, the wound made by Doctor Perry in the neck would not have been able to produce, wouldn't have been able to produce, these contusions of the musculature of the neck” (WC Vol. 2, p. 347, 3/16/1964 testimony [text]). Again, why would Humes say there was “...some ecchymosis or contusion, of the muscles of the right anterior neck inferiorly, without, however, any disruption of the muscles or any significant tearing of the muscles…”, if Perry and McClelland said the strap muscles were cut through?

David Lifton's tapes! They are in the archive!

Can the website be fixed?

Three books called Killing Kennedy? Come on. At least "What In Tarnation Happened In Dealey Plaza?" is original.

A basic statement of correlation does not necessarily imply causation, not does a basic statement of causation preclude the possibility of a feedback loop - racism causes poverty, poverty continues racism, people are affected based on race.

Part 2 and part 3 of the 2018 CAPA conference also shows some early clips from the animation: https://capa-us.org/the-last-witnesses-revealing-the-truth/ In the later half of part 3, there is also a cool video about Zapruder film authenticity.

Why not a sequel or a trilogy?

https://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/24196-dust-on-the-shirt/