Micah Mileto

How is IBM helping Nazis with the holocaust different than any other modern-day international trading?

The gas chambers were widely considered by the U.S. to be "fake news from Russia" until their forces took over the camps. Same with the tens-of-millions holocaust death counts suggested by some Soviet sources that were originally thought to be non-credible.

I'm surprised the article didn't mention some of the most confirmed "conspiracy theories" - the full extent of the holocaust, environmental cover-ups, nuclear disaster cover-ups, and nuclear weapon cover-ups.

Nevermind about my previous comment, the thing i was looking for was The Mysterious Kennedy Outtakes by Florence Graves, 1978

Do you have a copy of the Florence Graves article? "The Mysterious Kennedy Outtakes"?

delete

Top 9 problems with Johnny Brewer I know of: 1. Brewer's first statement was made on 12/6/63, two weeks after the assassination, not the same day or the day after, which would have been preferable for an important witness. 2. Brewer claimed to have SEEN, not heard, Police vehicles passing by a location where they almost certainly were not present. 3. Brewer claimed to have heard a description of the suspect on the radio BEFORE he saw the suspect, even though evidently no such description was circulating public airwaves at this time. 4. Brewer claimed to SEE the suspect enter the Texas Theater without buying a ticket, yet he also claimed to have asked the clerk if the suspect bought a ticket. 5. As summarized on harveyandlee.net: A very close friend of Jack Ruby's, Tommy Rowe, worked at Hardy's Shoe Store with Brewer. In 1964 Rowe told friends, relatives, and JFK researchers that it was he, NOT Brewer, who pointed out (HARVEY) Oswald to the police in the dark of the Texas Theater. Rowe was so close to Jack Ruby that Rowe moved into Ruby's apartment when Ruby went to jail for killing HARVEY Oswald. (Click here to see Midlothian Mirror editorial about Tommy Rowe.) (Click here for a 3/1/68 Los Angeles Free Press interview with Penn Jones and Roger Craig also discussing Tommy Rowe.) Unfortunately, Tommy Rowe was never interviewed by the DPD or FBI or WC or HSCA. It is worth repeating that in 1967 the New Orleans District Attorney's office interviewed Tommy Rowe, who lived in Apt. 206 at 223 S. Ewing (the same apartment occupied by Jack Ruby in 1963). Mr. Rowe said that he told shoe store manager Johnny Brewer that he saw a man wear­ing a brown shirt enter the Texas Theater on the afternoon of November 22, 1963. If Rowe's statement is true then Johnny Brewer never saw the man in the brown shirt in front of his store, enter the theater, nor did he point out (HARVEY) to the police. 6. When interviewed by Ian Griggs, Brewer claimed that two acquaintances were also present in the shoe store, who he would not identify besides to say they were employees of IBM. Note: this may have been debunked already. 7. As summarized by Gokay Hasan Yusuf on KennedysAndKing.com: When Ian Griggs interviewed Johnny Brewer in 1996, Brewer told him that he heard Oswald shout out "It's all over"; or words to that effect (Griggs, No Case to Answer, page 64). But when Brewer testified before the Warren Commission, Brewer merely claimed that he heard some hollering, and that he couldn't make out exactly what Oswald said (WC Volume VII, page 6) 8. ibid: When Johnny Brewer testified before the Warren Commission, he claimed that he observed a gun in Oswald's hand aimed "up in the air" (WC Volume VII, page 6). During his interview with Ian Griggs in 1996, he now claimed that Oswald was trying to shoot McDonald in the head (Griggs, No Case to Answer, page 64). Yet, none of the other witnesses and the arresting Officers, let alone Nick McDonald, claimed that this is what they had seen during the scuffle. Moreover, Brewer's claim is directly contradicted by Charles Walker, who stated that the gun was pointed about waist high. 9. ibid: When Johnny Calvin Brewer, the shoe store manager who allegedly witnessed Oswald duck into the Theater without paying, testified before the Warren Commission on April 2, 1964, he claimed that he heard someone holler "He's got a gun" (ibid, page 6). Brewer explained that before he heard this, he had seen a gun "...come up and - in Oswald's hand, a gun up in the air" (ibid). But as discussed in part 1 of this writer's review of With Malice, this was most certainly a lie (see under the subheading VI: Closing in). Aside from Hill and Brewer, this writer knows of no other officer (or witness) who claimed that they heard someone yell out that Oswald had a gun. This writer is also unaware of any officer/witness who took credit for yelling out that Oswald had a gun.

It's stuff like this which makes me seriously worry that one day the government is going to try saying "the official story is true, but the single bullet theory isn't true". I suppose that one could also try arguing that Oswald tried to reduce the noise and velocity of his first shot by removing some of the powder from the first round in the chamber - in which case, maybe a low-speed 6.5 slug fired from a modified shell could've - hypothetically - entered Kennedy's back, continued on a path that was not necessarily straight, barely exiting exited the throat, leaving a tiny exit wound, the round falling into the Limousine only to be subsequently lost or "innocently" stolen or planted somewhere else for a reason other than covering up multiple shooters. Then perhaps somebody could try arguing the 6.5 fragments reportedly found in the Limousine were from Connally, not the headshot.

No, Bart Kamp has Livingstone's audio recordings of interviews with people like Humes, Boswell, etc.

Any more word on when the Livingstone medical materials will be digitized and released?

My bets might be on an altered throat wound. That's a 170-page essay still coming soon - The Case for an Altered Throat Wound.

https://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/27640-the-latest-january-2021-update-on-angelos-leiloglous-3d-model-of-dealey-plaza/ Any opinions on this?

Is the official story that 10 centimeters of Connally's rib was literally pulverized by the bullet? Because I have hear David Lifton say that portion of rib was possibly secretly removed by surgery. As pointed out by Millicent Cranor, even the Discovery Channel bullet didn't go through that much bone.

Apparently Bulio failed at editing, because he accidentally left in a part in Reclaiming History where he states as a fact the HSCA's conclusion of a back wound lower than the throat wound.

From Reclaiming History by Vincent Bugliosi: Conspiracy theorist Dr. David Mantik makes much of the fact that Fox showed up with color negatives, rather than color transparencies, pointing out that only color transparencies were exposed at the autopsy. Mantik then erroneously reports that “only color transparencies exist in the Archives today—there are no color negatives” (David W. Mantik, “Paradoxes of the JFK Assassination: The Medical Evidence Decoded,” in Fetzer, Murder in Dealey Plaza, p.241). However, the 1966 inventory clearly lists numerous color negatives among the autopsy materials (ARRB MD 13, “Report of Inspection by Naval Medical Staff on November 1, 1966 at National Archives of X-Rays and Photographs of Autopsy of President John F. Kennedy,” November 1, 1966, pp.7–10), the same negatives noted by the Clark Panel in 1968 and the HSCA in 1978 (7 HSCA 46–47). These color negatives are, of course, the internegatives (i.e., a negative created from slide or transparency film in order to produce photographic prints) created by Fox on November 27, 1963.

Yes, it would seem that the color negatives in the official collection are just copies of the color positives. The issue would probably seem settled enough to not bother asking somebody with access to the autopsy photos to go back and check that the negatives are identical to the positives. The source of confusion is that two witnesses - Robert Knudsen and Saundra Spencer - explicitly denied seeing any color positive film when they were at the NPC. Spencer claimed that the white house lab was incapable of developing color positive film. I am aware of no witness that specifically describes the making of color negatives by copying from a color positive.

Here's why I'm confused - A memo from James Fox, dated 2/16/1967, reads “... On November 27th, 1963, I was instructed by my supervisor, SAIC Robert I. Bouck, Protective Research Section, to make arrangements with the Naval Processing Center located in Anacostia to have processed both black and white negatives and color positives made during the autopsy of President John F. Kennedy at the Bethesda Naval Hospital” (ARRB MD 121), And a 2/23/1967 statement, signed by Roy Kellerman, Fox, Bouck, Bouck's secretary Edith Duncan, and Assistant Director for the Secret Service Thomas J. Kelley, reads “...The black and white film was processed, black and white negatives were developed, and color positives were made from the colored film. ” (ARRB MD 122). When Robert Knudsen talked to the HSCA, he said that only black and white and color negative film was involved, no color positive. Saundra Spencer told the ARRB that there was only color negative film involved, and that she didn't think the room she was in charge of (the White House laboratory) had the capability of processing color negative film. What happened here?

When it says "prints", does that mean a frame of negative film made by copying a piece of positive film?

From John Stringer's ARRB deposition: https://www.jfk-assassination.net/russ/testimony/stringer.htm Q: In autopsy photography, did you ever use color negative film around 1963? A: I don't think so. [...] Q: Mr. Stringer, are you able to determine whether the negatives that are below each of the positive transparencies are internegatives taken from the positive transparencies? A: I think they are. Q: Is there any question in your mind whether the negative - the color negatives might have been the camera originals that you took on November 22nd? Right now, again, speaking of the color negatives. A: Color negatives? Q: Yes. A: That they were taken at the time of the autopsy? Q: Could those have been camera originals? A: I don't think so. "internegative" means copy.

It is possible to take a piece of color positive transparency film and make a copy of it in the form of a piece of color negative film, but I can't find any witness specifically described doing this (Robert Bouck, James Fox, Robert Knudsen, Vincent Madonia, Saundra Spencer). Could all of the color negative film in the official collection of autopsy photos just be copies made from color positive film? Is there any acknowledgement of this in any source I'm missing? The Sibert and O'Neill report lists "22 4 X 5 color photographs", but the official collection has over 40 total pieces of both positive and negative color film (excluding the later brain photos). So are all of the negatives somehow just copies of the positives? I don't remember seeing any source that bothers to explain how 22 pieces of color film became over 40. Can somebody like Mantik with access to the official autopsy photos confirm whether the images on the negatives are identical to the images on the positives?

What about that quote from Josiah Thompson's 2003 presentation from a nurse who said "I wish they would stop putting bullets on these stretchers"?

Sorry this isn't the right thread, but was there anything to the alleged quote I think you mentioned in an old presentation where a nurse had apparently complained "I wish they would stop putting bullets on these stretchers"? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oolUozA1Crw&t=27m14s Does your new book contain anything about this?

There is value in citing secondary sources that discuss primary sources - secondary sources can be used to show that a discussion exists, not whether the points being made are correct.

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1uQkTxVu2AIU6XVCNNVN77o2saQSqg5w_

What? I remember a thread here where they were talking about a man seen leaving the building, and there was speculation that he was a conspirator.