Micah Mileto

Will that be Dallas on the dreaded 60th anniversary?

I should also mention that reporter Martin Steadman passed away, weeks after I tried to get in touch with him, and especially ask him about the contemporaneous "notebook" he mentioned in his article. Maybe a family member could help? idk.

As for Perry's interaction with the person after the press conference, this seems to be a myth, unless I'm missing something. I can't find where either James Gochenaur or Dr. David Miller claimed that Perry was "intimidated" on the first day. It sounds to me like Dr. McClelland misremembered something from JFK and the Unspeakable, even though McClelland was apparently present for the later 12/11/1963 interactions with Elmer Moore, which officially involved no coercion, although we've all seen cop shows where the cheapest interrogation tactics can be used without it being legally called coercion.

The museum literally lies to people about simple things like the back wound etc.

https://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/27640-the-latest-january-2021-update-on-angelos-leiloglous-3d-model-of-dealey-plaza/

That would be an interesting stealth game - shoot Kennedy from the Knoll and then try to quickly escape in a way that maintains consistency with all of the real-life photographic evidence.

Maybe one day they could fix their horribly misleading presentation of all of the evidence.

It should have an option letting you admit access to the site anyway

https://jfk.emuseum.com/search/parkland dr. https://jfk.emuseum.com/search/oral history

If the geometry of the official story is correct (as it is in this game), it would have been possible to fire a bullet through Kennedy's head and into Connally's heart.

If the holocaust happened because it was an excuse for slave labor benefiting international business.

How is IBM helping Nazis with the holocaust different than any other modern-day international trading?

The gas chambers were widely considered by the U.S. to be "fake news from Russia" until their forces took over the camps. Same with the tens-of-millions holocaust death counts suggested by some Soviet sources that were originally thought to be non-credible.

I'm surprised the article didn't mention some of the most confirmed "conspiracy theories" - the full extent of the holocaust, environmental cover-ups, nuclear disaster cover-ups, and nuclear weapon cover-ups.

Nevermind about my previous comment, the thing i was looking for was The Mysterious Kennedy Outtakes by Florence Graves, 1978

Do you have a copy of the Florence Graves article? "The Mysterious Kennedy Outtakes"?

delete

Top 9 problems with Johnny Brewer I know of: 1. Brewer's first statement was made on 12/6/63, two weeks after the assassination, not the same day or the day after, which would have been preferable for an important witness. 2. Brewer claimed to have SEEN, not heard, Police vehicles passing by a location where they almost certainly were not present. 3. Brewer claimed to have heard a description of the suspect on the radio BEFORE he saw the suspect, even though evidently no such description was circulating public airwaves at this time. 4. Brewer claimed to SEE the suspect enter the Texas Theater without buying a ticket, yet he also claimed to have asked the clerk if the suspect bought a ticket. 5. As summarized on harveyandlee.net: A very close friend of Jack Ruby's, Tommy Rowe, worked at Hardy's Shoe Store with Brewer. In 1964 Rowe told friends, relatives, and JFK researchers that it was he, NOT Brewer, who pointed out (HARVEY) Oswald to the police in the dark of the Texas Theater. Rowe was so close to Jack Ruby that Rowe moved into Ruby's apartment when Ruby went to jail for killing HARVEY Oswald. (Click here to see Midlothian Mirror editorial about Tommy Rowe.) (Click here for a 3/1/68 Los Angeles Free Press interview with Penn Jones and Roger Craig also discussing Tommy Rowe.) Unfortunately, Tommy Rowe was never interviewed by the DPD or FBI or WC or HSCA. It is worth repeating that in 1967 the New Orleans District Attorney's office interviewed Tommy Rowe, who lived in Apt. 206 at 223 S. Ewing (the same apartment occupied by Jack Ruby in 1963). Mr. Rowe said that he told shoe store manager Johnny Brewer that he saw a man wear­ing a brown shirt enter the Texas Theater on the afternoon of November 22, 1963. If Rowe's statement is true then Johnny Brewer never saw the man in the brown shirt in front of his store, enter the theater, nor did he point out (HARVEY) to the police. 6. When interviewed by Ian Griggs, Brewer claimed that two acquaintances were also present in the shoe store, who he would not identify besides to say they were employees of IBM. Note: this may have been debunked already. 7. As summarized by Gokay Hasan Yusuf on KennedysAndKing.com: When Ian Griggs interviewed Johnny Brewer in 1996, Brewer told him that he heard Oswald shout out "It's all over"; or words to that effect (Griggs, No Case to Answer, page 64). But when Brewer testified before the Warren Commission, Brewer merely claimed that he heard some hollering, and that he couldn't make out exactly what Oswald said (WC Volume VII, page 6) 8. ibid: When Johnny Brewer testified before the Warren Commission, he claimed that he observed a gun in Oswald's hand aimed "up in the air" (WC Volume VII, page 6). During his interview with Ian Griggs in 1996, he now claimed that Oswald was trying to shoot McDonald in the head (Griggs, No Case to Answer, page 64). Yet, none of the other witnesses and the arresting Officers, let alone Nick McDonald, claimed that this is what they had seen during the scuffle. Moreover, Brewer's claim is directly contradicted by Charles Walker, who stated that the gun was pointed about waist high. 9. ibid: When Johnny Calvin Brewer, the shoe store manager who allegedly witnessed Oswald duck into the Theater without paying, testified before the Warren Commission on April 2, 1964, he claimed that he heard someone holler "He's got a gun" (ibid, page 6). Brewer explained that before he heard this, he had seen a gun "...come up and - in Oswald's hand, a gun up in the air" (ibid). But as discussed in part 1 of this writer's review of With Malice, this was most certainly a lie (see under the subheading VI: Closing in). Aside from Hill and Brewer, this writer knows of no other officer (or witness) who claimed that they heard someone yell out that Oswald had a gun. This writer is also unaware of any officer/witness who took credit for yelling out that Oswald had a gun.

It's stuff like this which makes me seriously worry that one day the government is going to try saying "the official story is true, but the single bullet theory isn't true". I suppose that one could also try arguing that Oswald tried to reduce the noise and velocity of his first shot by removing some of the powder from the first round in the chamber - in which case, maybe a low-speed 6.5 slug fired from a modified shell could've - hypothetically - entered Kennedy's back, continued on a path that was not necessarily straight, barely exiting exited the throat, leaving a tiny exit wound, the round falling into the Limousine only to be subsequently lost or "innocently" stolen or planted somewhere else for a reason other than covering up multiple shooters. Then perhaps somebody could try arguing the 6.5 fragments reportedly found in the Limousine were from Connally, not the headshot.

No, Bart Kamp has Livingstone's audio recordings of interviews with people like Humes, Boswell, etc.

Any more word on when the Livingstone medical materials will be digitized and released?

My bets might be on an altered throat wound. That's a 170-page essay still coming soon - The Case for an Altered Throat Wound.

https://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/27640-the-latest-january-2021-update-on-angelos-leiloglous-3d-model-of-dealey-plaza/ Any opinions on this?

Is the official story that 10 centimeters of Connally's rib was literally pulverized by the bullet? Because I have hear David Lifton say that portion of rib was possibly secretly removed by surgery. As pointed out by Millicent Cranor, even the Discovery Channel bullet didn't go through that much bone.

Apparently Bulio failed at editing, because he accidentally left in a part in Reclaiming History where he states as a fact the HSCA's conclusion of a back wound lower than the throat wound.