Micah Mileto

Oh, and while Francis X. O'Neill claimed to have actually SEEN the dead baby wheeled through the corridor at Bethesda hospital, Lifton said in Best Evidence that he couldn't find any evidence of any such infant death. Edit: O'Neill was almost certainly known to be lying about staying at the autopsy to see the restoration.

Around the time of High Treason 2’s publication, Livingstone was a guest on the Jim Bohannon show on San Diego radio station KSDO. The only known upload on the internet gives no date. Livingstone again claimed that his car was sabotaged (Audio, 44:18 [link 2] [link 3] [link 4]), something which was not discussed in his books: Caller: [...] if you're worried about these men in power that took President Kennedy's life and Jackie ran away from them, wouldn't you be afraid that they would try to assassinate you and to shut you up? Livingstone: I- I had a government job for a brief period of time, and I was almost blown up in my automobile by a federal employee whom I knew quite well. People play rough- Bohannon: -Blown up? Are you talking about a car bomb? Livingstone: No, the car- the- the mechanism of the engine was set to gasoline pouring all over the engine to- to explode. I knew the guy very well- Bohannon: And you know for a fact that a federal employee did it? Was that person- Livingstone: He was a friend of mine- Bohannon: -convicted? Livingstone: - and I- I mean the person that I worked with . Bohannon: Was that person tried and convicted- Livingstone: No, I never said anything about it, be- but the point of this is- Bohannon: Why? Livingstone: The point of this is that people play very rough in this life, lots of people get killed in this United States every year. Several journalists are killed around the world, many journalists are killed every year. Bohannon: Somebody tries to kill you, you know, I- I must say, I’m a little different from you, my tendency would be- Livingstone: Sometimes, the best thing to do- Bohannon: -go to the cops, or, you know, my first gut reaction would be to- Livingstone: I took care of it my way, Jim. I took care of it my way. Bohannon: Which is what? Livingstone: Don’t read anything into that. Bohannon: Well I don't have to, you- Livingstone: Ok, we’re going to the next question- Bohannon: -tell us. Well, lets- well, alright. Livingstone: Go on to the next question. Bohannon: You took care of it your way, you're not going to tell us what that is. Livingstone: I don’t have to. Bohannon: Well, you don’t have to, no. Livingstone: What was the next question? Bohannon: No, you don't have to, that’s very true, sir. [...]

Who can fully believe in a solution to a crime that involves so much trust in authority figures, even with the so-called physical evidence?

Harrisonelivingstone.com is only partially backed up on the wayback machine. Some writings are apparently lost. What ever happened to Livingstone's hard drives? https://web.archive.org/web/20130126082105/http://harrisonelivingstone.com/

Body language is a pseudoscience. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DUOleAo7lCk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y0VQyEY-B2I https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fsNLdrTf8YjdtnxXmhx36RHgoHa8wjMM1ftcOUhTy6A/edit

Thanks!

3 days late, sorry. The Warren Commission did not attempt to make a full list of every person who reportedly witnessed the wounds in Kennedy’s body. Neither would the House Select Committee on Assassinations. Almost none of the Parkland staff, in their Warren Commission testimonies, were asked on the record whether they desired to bring legal representation. Only Dr. Robert Shaw, who treated Governor Connally, was asked on the record in his second testimony on 4/21/1964, “Do you desire an attorney to be with you?”, to which he declined (WC Vol. 4, pp. 101-117 [text]). Some of the Parkland staff acknowledged having been questioned by the Secret Service, but the names of the interviewers were never provided (WC Vol. 6, pp. 120-123, 3/20/1964 testimony of Jane Wester [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 128-134, 3/20/1964 testimony of Darrell Tomlinson [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 115-119, 3/21/1964 testimony of Ruth Standridge [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 125-128, 3/21/1964 testimony of R. J. Jimison [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 18-30, 3/21/1964 testimony of Dr. William Kemp Clark [text]; WC Vol. 6. pp. 83-95, 3/23/1964 testimony of Dr. Robert Shaw [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 95-104, 3/23/1964 testimony of Dr. Charles Gregory [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 104-113, 3/23/1964 testimony of Dr. George Shires [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 51-57, 3/24/1964 testimony of Dr. Ronald Jones [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 39-45, 3/24/1964 testimony of Dr. Charles Baxter [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 1-7, 3/25/1964 tetimony of Dr. Charles Carrico [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 63-68, 3/25/1964 testimony of Dr. Gene Akin [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 61-63, 3/25/1964 testimony of Dr. Fouad Bashour [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 72-76, 3/25/1964 testimony of Dr. Adolph Giesecke [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 123-124, 3/25/1964 testimony of Henrietta Ross [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 7-18, 3/25/1964 testimony of Dr. Malcolm Perry [text]; WC Vol. 3, pp. 357-366, 3/30/1964 testimony of Dr. Charles Carrico [text]; WC Vol. 3, pp. 366-390, 3/30/1964 testimony of Dr. Malcolm Perry [text]; WC Vol. 4, pp. 101-117, 4/21/1964 testimony of Dr. Robert Shaw [text]). Others from Parkland either didn’t say or weren’t asked about what earlier interviews they may have had with the Secret Service (WC Vol. 6, pp. 143-147, testimony of Doris Nelson, 3/20/1964 [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 139-143, 3/21/1964 testimony of Margaret Hinchliffe/Hinchcliffe/Henchliffe [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 30-36, Dr. Robert McClelland's 3/21/1964 testimony [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 134-139, 3/24/1964 testimony of Diana Bowron [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 148-152, testimony of Charles Jack Price, 3/25/1964 [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 45-51, 3/25/1964 testimony of Dr. Marion Jenkins [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 113-115, testimony of Dr. Richard Dulany, 3/25/1964 [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 36-39, 3/25/1964 testimony of Dr. Robert McClelland [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 82-83, testimony of Dr. Martin White, 3/25/1964 [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 113-115, 3/25/1964 testimony of Dr. Richard Dulany [text]). Some were asked if they had been interviewed by the federal government, to which they replied that they had not (WC Vol. 6, pp. 57-60, 3/24/1964 testimony of Dr. Donald Curtis [text]; WC Vol. 6 pp. 76-79, 3/24/1964 testimony of Dr. Jackie Hansen Hunt [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 68-72, 3/24/1964 testimony of Dr. Paul Peters [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 80-81, 3/25/1964 testimony of Dr. Kenneth Salyer [text]). A few made statements suggesting that they were questioned by a different government entity such as the FBI (WC Vol. 6, pp. 128-134, 3/20/1964 testimony of Darrell Tomlinson [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 18-30, 3/21/1964 testimony of Dr. William Kemp Clark [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 95-104, 3/23/1964 testimony of Dr. Charles Gregory [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 104-113, 3/23/1964 testimony of Dr. George Shires [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 45-51, 3/25/1964 testimony of Dr. Marion Jenkins [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 7-18, 3/25/1964 testimony of Dr. Malcolm Perry [text]), but again, no details were provided. Most of the witnesses did not gave a full list of their interactions with the news media or other private entities. Nurse Diana Bowron acknowledged her appearance in 3 newspaper articles, copies of which became Warren Commission exhibits printed in the volumes (The Observer, 11/23/1963, British nurse there [link]; Daily Mail, 11/23/1963, British girl for Kennedy by Sydney Brennan [link]; The Mirror, 11/23/1963, Thirty minutes Diana will never forget [link]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 134-139, 3/24/1964 testimony of Diana Bowron [text]). Bowron was asked in her 3/24/1964 testimony “...does that constitute all the stories which appeared about your participation in this event?”, to which she replied “Yes” (WC Vol. 6, pp. 134-139 [text]). Indeed, there does not appear to have been any more public information on JFK’s wounds from Nurse Bowron at that time. Dr. Kemp Clark acknowledged participating in five press conferences (WC Vol. 6, pp. 18-30, 3/21/1964 testimony of Dr. Clark [text]), and Perry acknowledged participating in at least two conferences (WC Vol. 6, pp. 7-18, 3/25/1964 testimony of Dr. Malcolm Perry [text]; WC Vol. 3, pp. 357-366, 3/30/1964 testimony of Dr. Charles Carrico [text]; WC Vol. 3, pp. 366-390, 3/30/1964 testimony of Dr. Malcolm Perry [text]). Perry didn’t mention some of his other interactions with other private entities, such as shown in the 11/24/1963 article in the New York Herald Tribune, A Death in Emergency Room One by Jimmy Breslin (Link [link 2]), or the 11/24/1963 Boston Globe article, Doctor Eating... Then Came Call by Herbert Black (Link). At least 2 other reporters claimed to have interviewed Perry at the time – Connie Kritzberg (JFK: Secrets from the Sixth Floor Window by Connie Kritzberg, 1995; Dealey Plaza Echo, Vol. 1, Issue 3, Nov. 1999, pp. 10-17, A Personal Story: Report the Death of a President, by Connie Kritzberg [link 2] [link 3]; The Men Who Killed Kennedy, episode 7, The Smoking Guns, 2003, 6:18 [link 2]) and Martin J. Steadman Eve's Magazine, 2013, 50 Years from that Fateful Day in Dallas... by Martin J. Steadman). Kritzberg also claimed to have interviewed Dr. Clark (JFK: Secrets from the Sixth Floor Window by Connie Kritzberg, 1995; Dealey Plaza Echo, Vol. 1, Issue 3, Nov. 1999, pp. 10-17, A Personal Story: Report the Death of a President, by Connie Kritzberg [link 2] [link 3]; The Men Who Killed Kennedy, episode 7, The Smoking Guns, 2003, 6:18 [link 2]). Dr. Adolph Giesecke was asked in his testimony on 3/25/1964 “Now, you mentioned a few minutes ago that you talked about this matter with a number of people–whom have you talked to, Dr. Giesecke?”, to which he replied “Well, of course, we discussed it with Dr. Jenkins and various members of the anesthesia staff. We have discussed it with--I've forgotten that gentleman's name, but he was from the American Medical Association, as a historian. We discussed it with Dr. Mike Bush, who then reported it in the Anesthesiology Newsletter, which is a publication of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, and then discussed it with the Secretary of- may I retract that. That's about it--that's the extent of the discussion, except with other members of the surgical staff and the anesthesia staff and these people”. The news media didn’t appear to have any more information from Giesecke at the time. Dr. Charles Carrico was asked in his 3/30/1964 testimony “Have you been interviewed by the press and, if so, when?”, to which Carrico replied “I think I have talked to the press twice. Mr. Burrus, a reporter for the Dallas Times Herald, talked to me about 5 minutes, probably 3 or 4 days after the President's death, and then a reporter from Time called about 3 or 4 weeks after the President's death, and I talked to him for a very few minutes” (WC Vol. 3, pp. 357-366 [text]). No other descriptions from Crarrico seem to have been in the news. Some witnesses acknowledged having a discussion with Arlen Specter some time before they testified on the record (WC Vol. 6, pp. 120-123, 3/20/1964 testimony of Jane Wester [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 143-147, testimony of Doris Nelson, 3/20/1964 [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 128-134, 3/20/1964 testimony of Darrell Tomlinson [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 18-30, 3/21/1964 testimony of Dr. William Kemp Clark [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 30-36, 3/21/1964 testimony of Dr. Robert McClelland [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 139-143, 3/21/1964 testimony of Margaret Hinchliffe/Hinchcliffe/Henchliffe [text]; WC Vol. 6. pp. 83-95, 3/23/1964 testimony of Dr. Robert Shaw [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 115-119, 3/21/1964 testimony of Ruth Standridge [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 125-128, 3/21/1964 testimony of R. J. Jimison [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 95-104, 3/23/1964 testimony of Dr. Charles Gregory [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 104-113, 3/23/1964 testimony of Dr. George Shires [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 57-60, 3/24/1964 testimony of Dr. Donald Curtis [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 51-57, 3/24/1964 testimony of Dr. Ronald Jones [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 39-45, 3/24/1964 testimony of Dr. Charles Baxter [text]; WC Vol. 6 pp. 76-79, 3/24/1964 testimony of Dr. Jackie Hansen Hunt [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 134-139, 3/24/1964 testimony of Diana Bowron [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 68-72, 3/24/1964 testimony of Dr. Paul Peters [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 63-68, 3/25/1964 testimony of Dr. Gene Akin [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 61-63, 3/25/1964 testimony of Dr. Fouad Bashour [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 72-76, 3/25/1964 testimony of Dr. Adolph Giesecke [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 1-7, 3/25/1964 tetimony of Dr. Charles Carrico [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 148-152, testimony of Charles Jack Price, 3/25/1964 [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 27-30, 3/25/1964 testimony of Dr. William Kemp Clark [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 36-39, 3/25/1964 testimony of Dr. Robert McClelland [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 45-51, 3/25/1964 testimony of Dr. Marion Jenkins [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 7-18, 3/25/1964 testimony of Dr. Malcolm Perry [text]). Other Parkland witnesses either weren’t asked, or no reference was given to any such pre-testimony discussion (WC Vol. 6, pp. 80-81, 3/25/1964 testimony of Dr. Kenneth Salyer [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 113-115, 3/25/1964 testimony of Dr. Richard Dulany [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 82-83, testimony of Dr. Martin White, 3/25/1964 [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 123-124, 3/25/1964 testimony of Henrietta Ross [text]). Bethesda pathologists Humes, Boswell, and Finck would acknowledge meeting with Arlen Specter prior to testifying (WC Vol. 2, pp. 347-376, Dr. Humes' WC testimony, 3/16/1964 [text]; ARRB MD 28, 1/25/1965 and 2/1/1965 Reports From Dr. Finck to Gen. Blumberg; ARRB MD 26, 8/17/1977 report on 8/16/1977 interview of Dr. J. Thornton Boswell; ARRB MD 30, Finck's HSCA testimony, 3/11/1978 [text] [audio]; Dr. Finck's 3/12/1978 interview by the HSCA [audio]; JAMA, 5/27/1992, Vol 267, No. 20, pp. 2794-2803, At Large With Dennis L. Breo, JFK's death - the plain truth from the MDs who did the autopsy [text]; ARRB deposition of Dr. James Humes, 2/13/1996 [text] [audio, partial]; ARRB deposition of J. Thornton Boswell, 2/26/1996 [text]; Dr. Pierre Finck's ARRB deposition, 5/24/1996 [text]). The pathologists also explained how they only got to a chance to examine the clothing at the time of the Warren Commission (WC Vol. 2, pp. 347-376, Dr. Humes' WC testimony, 3/16/1964 [text]; ARRB MD 28, 1/25/1965 and 2/1/1965 Reports From Dr. Finck to Gen. Blumberg). Specter authored a report on his 3/11/1964 interview of Humes, Boswell, and Admiral Calvin Galloway (Link). No reports were known to have been made describing the Commission’s pre-testimony interviews of Parkland witnesses. Specter did report on his 3/12/1964 interview of two FBI agents who witnessed the autopsy, James Sibert and Francis X. O’Neill (3/12/1964 memo from Specter to J. Lee Rankin, Interview of FBI Agents Present at Autopsy [link 2] [link 3] [link 4]). Neither agent testified. Some of the witnesses acknowledged the issue of whether they detailed their experiences in any other written records besides their hospital reports (WC Vol. 6, pp. 120-123, 3/20/1964 testimony of Jane Wester [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 18-30, 3/21/1964 testimony of Dr. William Kemp Clark [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 139-143, 3/21/1964 testimony of Margaret Hinchliffe/Hinchcliffe/Henchliffe [text]; WC Vol. 6. pp. 83-95, 3/23/1964 testimony of Dr. Robert Shaw [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 95-104, 3/23/1964 testimony of Dr. Charles Gregory [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 57-60, 3/24/1964 testimony of Dr. Donald Curtis [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 51-57, 3/24/1964 testimony of Dr. Ronald Jones [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 39-45, 3/24/1964 testimony of Dr. Charles Baxter [text]; WC Vol. 6 pp. 76-79, 3/24/1964 testimony of Dr. Jackie Hansen Hunt [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 68-72, 3/24/1964 testimony of Dr. Paul Peters [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 1-7, 3/25/1964 tetimony of Dr. Charles Carrico [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 45-51, 3/25/1964 testimony of Dr. Marion Jenkins [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 61-63, 3/25/1964 testimony of Dr. Fouad Bashour [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 72-76, 3/25/1964 testimony of Dr. Adolph Giesecke [text]; WC Vol. 3, pp. 366-390, 3/30/1964 testimony of Dr. Malcolm Perry [text]; WC Vol. 3, pp. 357-366, 3/30/1964 testimony of Dr. Charles Carrico [text]). Others didn’t acknowledge, or weren’t asked about additional written records (WC Vol. 6, pp. 143-147, testimony of Doris Nelson, 3/20/1964 [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 128-134, 3/20/1964 testimony of Darrell Tomlinson [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 115-119, 3/21/1964 testimony of Ruth Standridge [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 125-128, 3/21/1964 testimony of R. J. Jimison [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 30-36, 3/21/1964 testimony of Dr. Robert McClelland [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 104-113, 3/23/1964 testimony of Dr. George Shires [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 134-139, 3/24/1964 testimony of Diana Bowron [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 63-68, 3/25/1964 testimony of Dr. Gene Akin [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 36-39, 3/25/1964 testimony of Dr. Robert McClelland [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 80-81, 3/25/1964 testimony of Dr. Kenneth Salyer [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 113-115, 3/25/1964 testimony of Dr. Richard Dulany [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 82-83, testimony of Dr. Martin White, 3/25/1964 [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 123-124, 3/25/1964 testimony of Henrietta Ross [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 148-152, testimony of Charles Jack Price, 3/25/1964 [text]). Some Parkland witnesses were asked whether they had any other information to volunteer (WC Vol. 6, pp. 139-143, 3/21/1964 testimony of Margaret Hinchliffe/Hinchcliffe/Henchliffe [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 115-119, 3/21/1964 testimony of Ruth Standridge [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 125-128, 3/21/1964 testimony of R. J. Jimison [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 18-30, 3/21/1964 testimony of Dr. William Kemp Clark [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 30-36, 3/21/1964 testimony of Dr. Robert McClelland [text]; WC Vol. 6. pp. 83-95, 3/23/1964 testimony of Dr. Robert Shaw [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 95-104, 3/23/1964 testimony of Dr. Charles Gregory [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 104-113, 3/23/1964 testimony of Dr. George Shires [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 51-57, 3/24/1964 testimony of Dr. Ronald Jones [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 39-45, 3/24/1964 testimony of Dr. Charles Baxter [text]; WC Vol. 6 pp. 76-79, 3/24/1964 testimony of Dr. Jackie Hansen Hunt [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 134-139, 3/24/1964 testimony of Diana Bowron [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 57-60, 3/24/1964 testimony of Dr. Donald Curtis [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 68-72, 3/24/1964 testimony of Dr. Paul Peters [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 1-7, 3/25/1964 tetimony of Dr. Charles Carrico [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 63-68, 3/25/1964 testimony of Dr. Gene Akin [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 61-63, 3/25/1964 testimony of Dr. Fouad Bashour [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 72-76, 3/25/1964 testimony of Dr. Adolph Giesecke [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 27-30, 3/25/1964 testimony of Dr. William Kemp Clark [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 36-39, 3/25/1964 testimony of Dr. Robert McClelland [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 45-51, 3/25/1964 testimony of Dr. Marion Jenkins [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 7-18, 3/25/1964 testimony of Dr. Malcolm Perry [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 80-81, 3/25/1964 testimony of Dr. Kenneth Salyer [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 113-115, 3/25/1964 testimony of Dr. Richard Dulany [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 82-83, testimony of Dr. Martin White, 3/25/1964 [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 123-124, 3/25/1964 testimony of Henrietta Ross [text]; WC Vol. 3, pp. 357-366, 3/30/1964 testimony of Dr. Charles Carrico [text]; WC Vol. 4, pp. 101-117, 4/21/1964 testimony of Dr. Robert Shaw [text]; WC Vol. 4, pp. 117-129, 4/21/1964 testimony of Dr. Charles Gregory [text]), while others were not (WC Vol. 6, pp. 120-123, 3/20/1964 testimony of Jane Wester [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 143-147, testimony of Doris Nelson, 3/20/1964 [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 128-134, 3/20/1964 testimony of Darrell Tomlinson [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 148-152, testimony of Charles Jack Price, 3/25/1964 [text]). Not only were many of the Parkland staff were questioned on their level of experience with gunshot wounds, but many were asked their opinion on the official story’s very specific hypothetical perimeters, including the feet-per-second speed of the bullet (WC Vol. 6, pp. 139-143, 3/21/1964 testimony of Margaret Hinchliffe/Hinchcliffe/Henchliffe [text]; WC Vol. 6. pp. 83-95, 3/23/1964 testimony of Dr. Robert Shaw [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 95-104, 3/23/1964 testimony of Dr. Charles Gregory [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 104-113, 3/23/1964 testimony of Dr. George Shires [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 51-57, 3/24/1964 testimony of Dr. Ronald Jones [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 39-45, 3/24/1964 testimony of Dr. Charles Baxter [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 1-7, 3/25/1964 tetimony of Dr. Charles Carrico [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 63-68, 3/25/1964 testimony of Dr. Gene Akin [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 27-30, 3/25/1964 testimony of Dr. William Kemp Clark [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 7-18, 3/25/1964 testimony of Dr. Malcolm Perry [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 36-39, 3/25/1964 testimony of Dr. Robert McClelland [text]; WC Vol. 6, pp. 45-51, 3/25/1964 testimony of Dr. Marion Jenkins [text]; WC Vol. 3, pp. 357-366, 3/30/1964 testimony of Dr. Charles Carrico [text]; WC Vol. 3, pp. 366-390, 3/30/1964 testimony of Dr. Malcolm Perry [text]; WC Vol. 4, pp. 101-117, 4/21/1964 testimony of Dr. Robert Shaw [text]; WC Vol. 4, pp. 117-129, 4/21/1964 testimony of Dr. Charles Gregory [text]).

Today I will post my own survey of problems in medical witness wc testimonies.

Remember any examples off the top of your head?

Fixed.

Also here is study of the Harper fragment's chain of custody: http://www.old.reddit.com/r/JFKeveryday/comments/jz5hvu/small_wounds_in_the_front_of_jfks_head_part_12

The Harper fragment was (much later) recalled to have been found far forward of the limo, though?

The large head wound is an overrated issue compared to some of the other pieces of evidence. Just once I'd like to see a fully-produced documentary on the JFK medical evidence that doesn't bother touching on the large head wound.

The forklift?

The HSCA said that was just an artifact???

The HSCA literally accused the pathologists of lying about their memory... Of a bullet wound behind the President's ear.

Why couldn't an entering bullet have caused bruising of the strap muscles on the front of the neck? Also, we should be skeptical of the pathologists' description of the strap muscles. Perry and McClelland described cutting through the strap muscles, yet I do not think the pathologists made a single statement describing a surgical defect on the muscles They described bruising on the middle, but not scalpel cuts.

Wasn't there one point in the 90's where you could literally buy a set of prints by mail? Maybe I'm remembering wrong. But yes, it doesn't look like anybody has yet used modern technology to make the best quality scans of the prints (and negative film, if film is somehow available - BTW did James Fox ever have any film, or did he just have prints? I thought the story was, via Lifton who claimed to have actually met Fox, Kellerman handed Fox an extra set of prints and said "save a set of these for yourself, they'll be history some day" - was that a false cover story? Why are the bootleg photos apparently more cropped compared to the official photos? Both Fox and Crouch are dead).

Which book is the color side body view from?

Mantik just always seems to have the highest quality in his slide presentations posted to his website.

Where does one find such high-quality digital reproductions of the JFK photographs? Also, it's probably pointless to ask here, but is there any way that David Mantik and Doug Horne could have illegal possession of the ARRB's high-quality digital scans of the photos?

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/pdf/lane_interviews/huber.pdf Prolly want to wayback machine that

The little curve on the side of the bone looks like a side-view of the actual EOP.

Humes told the WC that pieces of skull bone fell to the table as soon as they started examining the scalp. No bone fragment was said to have been found at Parkland hospital.

Nobody would take a dollar bill that's torn in half. I hope that didn't just get thrown in the trash - the two half bills or the partially-torn whole bill.