Cory Santos

Jim I post this because I think it is relevant. Obviously some researchers think his affairs might have been a personal motive for some plotters. However, I think it is good that if this information is on the net and then posted here, someone like yourself can respond to give the other side. That way people reading here can gain another perspective about Vidal’s potential motive.

Paul Schrade died Blessings on him https://www.telegraphherald.com/ap/national/article_e866ad04-d94a-595e-b22e-74715fdd5609.html

https://www.irishcentral.com/roots/history/affair-jfk-jackie-kennedys-relationship-sister

Not if it’s true. That is a good defense.

It is relevant.

Reading your posts makes me ask then if Oswald was supposed to be a patsy for the Powers U2 incident. Was he a professional patsy someone was using?

Do you think Oswald had anything to do with Powers being shot down?

And you still haven’t responded to the Mark Lane comment I made. At least I didn’t see any response on that.

DVP logic: I would never hit her for you see she is my wife. Yes I disagree with bad logical assumptions such as the ones you are making.

Anyone looking at a historical or legal document should shake their head when reading clear bias such as this : I find it impossible to believe that Deputy AG Nick Katzenbach had any thoughts in his head of "cover-up" or suppressing the facts when he wrote his memo on 11/25/63.

That is not logical. I disagree. You are enthusing your anti-conspiracy feelings into observing facts on this one. You have that right but it fails the turd test.

Thank you Joe. We will wait for DVP to respond.

Agree. Rumored but I have never seen anything.

I have to agree with Jim Di David. Reading that memo from a legal standpoint really shows the old saying “you can polish a turd and put sprinkles on it, but it’s still a turd”. That memo set the tone for what was to follow. I can prove this. How? Because if your incorrect interpretation of the memo was correct, the WC would not have been secretive, more leads would have been followed instead of discouraged, and the records would have been public. But nope. Lastly, though I am not a Lane fan, if you have a disagreement, as Bugliosi did, with his way of conducting interviews and presenting them, I suggest you apply that same standard to wc lawyers and the commission members interviewing witnesses. Over and over, leading them, not asking relevant follow-up questions, etc. If you want the whole story from conspiracists then first start with your sacred WC. I think that’s fair to apply the same standard don’t you?

Light

Cliff!!! I thought I turned off the WiFi in the pool house. You turned it on again?

Again, he was not there as a signal but a distraction or diversion.

Yet DCM walks towards knoll and then leaves the plaza. Most people mill around. None of their actions are normal.

Lol

So really the only proof you have that he is umbrella man is his own testimony and comparing grainy photos. Wow, if only we could apply that same logic standard to the rest of the evidence. But lone nutters don’t do they?

Yes I always contend it is one of the true main relevant pieces of evidence that day.

Thank you Matt. So is it possible the application was just to get access to the roof for a shot at JFK? This might show premeditation on Oswald’s part. But this action hardly indicates RP or anyone else if he applied without any assistance from anyone. Any more comments on this Matt?

Interesting. Cite about the application please.

Because Joe it was a distraction. That is all it was. So no one would notice or watch DCM who actually was doing something.

Thanks Tom.