Bill Brown

Callaway said the man (Lovelady) bore a resemblance to Oswald. Callaway was correct, there was a resemblance (obviously). Callaway did not identify Lovelady as Oswald and therefore couldn't have "misidentified" one for the other. Spence showed Callaway the Lovelady (Altgens) photo and asked Callaway who the man was. Callaway didn't bite. Nice try by Spence but no cigar. Why do you keep doing things like this? I'm curious.

But... and this is the important part... LNers here aren't making things up out of thin air, as you are.

Exactly.

Nonsense. Where, in any of the above, does it say that Oswald stated that he worked at the Depository?

"In addition, all three fillers testified that they were asked questions during the lineup, including their names and places of employment. All three testified that they gave fictitious answers, while Lee Harvey Oswald gave his place of employment as the Texas School Book Depository." There is nothing in the testimonial record to suggest that Oswald, during the lineups, ever stated that he worked at the Depository. Stop making things up out of thin air.

On film.... Oswald: "I work in that building." Reporter: "Were you in that building at the time?" Oswald: "Naturally if I work in that building, yes sir." Therefore, Oswald was not out on the front steps or on the landing. If Oswald was not out on the front steps or the landing, then he is not Prayer Man/Prayer Woman.

Nonsense. Jack Myers' article is filled with errors. I've told you this before. I can list them if you like.

From the latest Dale Myers blog: http://jfkfiles.blogspot.com/2023/07/jfk-oswald-and-ruby.html I especially liked this part from the Preface of Judge Burt Griffin's book... "JFK, Oswald and Ruby: Politics, Prejudice and Truth sends this message: Oswald and Ruby were lone killers. There is no evidence of a conspirator. Historians and students of history should cease being criminal investigators. They should focus on the super-abundance of evidence as to why Oswald and Ruby committed political murders, the political and social environment as they saw it, and how the public’s knowledge of the lives of Oswald and Ruby may prevent history from repeating itself. They should ignore the political world that fascinates conspiracy theorists."

Some of the witnesses said the shooting occurred around 1:30. Now what?

But the police tapes tell you when Callaway made his report on the patrol car radio. Callaway tells you his actions upon hearing the shots and before getting on the radio. Work it backwards. Are you seriously trying to say that 1:14 can't be considered "around 1 o'clock"?

To recap, Callaway hears the shots. Runs to the sidewalk. Sees the gunman run south on Patton the entire block from Tenth to Jefferson. Runs the two-thirds of a block up to the shooting scene. Goes over to the police car and the first thing he does is grab the radio and report the shooting to the police dispatcher. How much time do you believe passed from the time Callaway heard the shots to the time he reported the shooting on the police radio? Let's say two minutes pass from the time Oswald shoots Tippit to the time Oswald turns the corner from Patton onto Jefferson. This is a little over one block and Oswald was running. Let's say it takes Callaway one minute when he made the "good hard run" the two-thirds of a block from his location to the patrol car. If these two time estimates are anywhere close to being correct, then Callaway is at the patrol car roughly three minutes after the shots rang out. Let's add another full minute for error. So we have Callaway at the patrol car using the police radio about four minutes after the shots rang out. Here's the thing... Callaway's report to the dispatcher while using the patrol car radio took place at 1:19/1:20. Do the math and work it backwards. At 1:19/1:20, Callaway makes the call. If four minutes have passed (and that's being generous, in my opinion) since the shots rang out, then the shots rang out around 1:15.

Nonsense. Holan did not live on Tenth Street on 11/22/63, nor did she give any information to any of the officers at the scene.

Westbrook is referring to Helen Markham, though he made an incorrect assumption about where she lived.

And by that time, he (Westbrook) had yet to arrive at the scene on Tenth Street.

Makes way more sense than the looney theory that Harvey and Lee were two different people.

"The Capt of Personnel - WESTBROOK - whose job it is to look after the personnel of the DPD, was at the TIPPIT murder scene by 1:30pm." No. Upon hearing of the shooting in Oak Cliff, Westbrook went straight from the Depository to the two old houses on Jefferson (located in the same block as the Texaco station) to help search for the killer there. He arrived at this location around 1:25. He was at this location while the jacket was discovered underneath one of the cars. Then word was put out that the suspect had run into the Jefferson Branch Library a few blocks away. With others, Westbrook hightailed it over to the library. A few minutes after arriving there, Westbrook contacted Sgt. Calvin "Bud" Owens (who was in charge of the scene at Tenth and Patton) to inform him that the library call was a dead end. It was only after talking to Owens that Westbrook then headed for the Tippit shooting scene. No way he did all of this in time to arrive at the shooting scene "by 1:30pm".

Was "Lee Harold Oswald" really the name of the person shot by Jack Ruby? People get names wrong. Sh*t happens.

"Police ballistics experts couldn't find the "Made Italy" and "Cal 6.5" printed on the rifle, yet somehow non-rifle expert Mark Lane was able to find it. Strange!" J.C. Day made a notation, that day, that the rifle was "Made Italy" and "Cal 6.5".

"Sergeant Rio Pierce and Patrolman Ray Vaughn appear in the Oswald shooting on the 24th." Just an FYI, Pierce was a lieutenant, not a sergeant; and I think you mean Roy Vaughn (not Ray).

As long as everyone understands that Oswald did not appear in lineups alongside men in suit and tie.

On film.... Oswald: "I work in that building." Reporter: "Were you in that building at the time?" Oswald: "Naturally if I work in that building, yes sir." Therefore, Oswald was not out on the front steps or on the landing. If Oswald was not out on the front steps or the landing, then he is not Prayer Man/Prayer Woman. Who cares, then?

"#1. ON FINDING THE JACKET UNDER THE CAR IN A PARKING LOT The Report concluded: "The jacket that was subsequently found in a parking lot and identified as Oswald’s was a light-gray one.“ ( pg. 653 )" Ah yes, the good ole white versus gray argument. This is easily the most lame argument of all of the arguments put forth by conspiracy advocates. Keep up the nice work, Gil. 🙄

There's a document in the Dallas Police records which mentions two torn halves of dollar bills. This document lists the serial numbers of both bills. However, it says nothing about Oswald and there's really no proof whatsoever that it is assassination related. But, that didn't stop Armstrong from taking it and running with it.

"there is nothing clear about whom Oswald is claiming set him up..." Again, Oswald isn't claiming that anyone is setting him up. He's simply saying that the Dallas Police Department likes him for the assassination for no other reason than he once lived in the Soviet Union.

At the Soviet Embassy in Mexico City, all three consular officials (undercover KGB officers) stated that the man they met with was indeed Lee Oswald. Pavel Yatskov Oleg Nechiporenko Valery Kostikov