Jack White Posted May 12, 2010 Share Posted May 12, 2010 Last night in my "third" Mac (formerly number one) I was looking for LHO autopsy photos, and I found an LHO folder with more than a thousand LHO photos and studies. Many of them date back thirty years or more. The LHO folder also includes Marguerite, Marina, and Robert Oswald. The thought occurred to me that present day researchers might like to see and study them, if a way existed to present them UNCLUTTERED BY REPLIES, DISCUSSION, AND CONTROVERSY. I would present each image with only minimal identification. I would title the thread THE OSWALD FILE. Images would be random and added as I have time. So I thought that IF members would agree NOT TO REPLY IN A DEDICATED THREAD, but copy each photo they want to discuss and start a new thread for that purpose, I would do so. If not, such a thread would become highly unwieldy. I am not interested in discussing the photos and studies IN A THREAD WHERE I POST THEM, but only if others want to discuss them under the proposed conditions on threads that they start. Would members agree to such a dedicated thread? How could it be enforced so that only I could post to it? Could more image space be allotted to it? I think that members might find it interesting to see some of these images. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Williams Posted May 12, 2010 Share Posted May 12, 2010 Last night in my "third" Mac (formerly number one) I was looking for LHO autopsyphotos, and I found an LHO folder with more than a thousand LHO photos and studies. Many of them date back thirty years or more. The LHO folder also includes Marguerite, Marina, and Robert Oswald. The thought occurred to me that present day researchers might like to see and study them, if a way existed to present them UNCLUTTERED BY REPLIES, DISCUSSION, AND CONTROVERSY. I would present each image with only minimal identification. I would title the thread THE OSWALD FILE. Images would be random and added as I have time. So I thought that IF members would agree NOT TO REPLY IN A DEDICATED THREAD, but copy each photo they want to discuss and start a new thread for that purpose, I would do so. If not, such a thread would become highly unwieldy. I am not interested in discussing the photos and studies IN A THREAD WHERE I POST THEM, but only if others want to discuss them under the proposed conditions on threads that they start. Would members agree to such a dedicated thread? How could it be enforced so that only I could post to it? Could more image space be allotted to it? I think that members might find it interesting to see some of these images. Jack Jack, If you would so desire I can put the pictures up on my website, which has no forum, and they could be viewed from there. This would force the issue of the no reply request on your part. From there they could save the images and post them here as they wished for discussion. Just an idea. Mike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Todd W. Vaughan Posted May 12, 2010 Share Posted May 12, 2010 Last night in my "third" Mac (formerly number one) I was looking for LHO autopsyphotos, and I found an LHO folder with more than a thousand LHO photos and studies. Many of them date back thirty years or more. The LHO folder also includes Marguerite, Marina, and Robert Oswald. The thought occurred to me that present day researchers might like to see and study them, if a way existed to present them UNCLUTTERED BY REPLIES, DISCUSSION, AND CONTROVERSY. I would present each image with only minimal identification. I would title the thread THE OSWALD FILE. Images would be random and added as I have time. So I thought that IF members would agree NOT TO REPLY IN A DEDICATED THREAD, but copy each photo they want to discuss and start a new thread for that purpose, I would do so. If not, such a thread would become highly unwieldy. I am not interested in discussing the photos and studies IN A THREAD WHERE I POST THEM, but only if others want to discuss them under the proposed conditions on threads that they start. Would members agree to such a dedicated thread? How could it be enforced so that only I could post to it? Could more image space be allotted to it? I think that members might find it interesting to see some of these images. Jack I would agree not to reply. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted May 12, 2010 Author Share Posted May 12, 2010 Last night in my "third" Mac (formerly number one) I was looking for LHO autopsyphotos, and I found an LHO folder with more than a thousand LHO photos and studies. Many of them date back thirty years or more. The LHO folder also includes Marguerite, Marina, and Robert Oswald. The thought occurred to me that present day researchers might like to see and study them, if a way existed to present them UNCLUTTERED BY REPLIES, DISCUSSION, AND CONTROVERSY. I would present each image with only minimal identification. I would title the thread THE OSWALD FILE. Images would be random and added as I have time. So I thought that IF members would agree NOT TO REPLY IN A DEDICATED THREAD, but copy each photo they want to discuss and start a new thread for that purpose, I would do so. If not, such a thread would become highly unwieldy. I am not interested in discussing the photos and studies IN A THREAD WHERE I POST THEM, but only if others want to discuss them under the proposed conditions on threads that they start. Would members agree to such a dedicated thread? How could it be enforced so that only I could post to it? Could more image space be allotted to it? I think that members might find it interesting to see some of these images. Jack Jack, If you would so desire I can put the pictures up on my website, which has no forum, and they could be viewed from there. This would force the issue of the no reply request on your part. From there they could save the images and post them here as they wished for discussion. Just an idea. Mike Thanks for the idea, but I would want them viewed by the forum members on the website. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Williams Posted May 12, 2010 Share Posted May 12, 2010 No problem there Jack, was just an idea. I hope you are well. MIke Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bernice Moore Posted May 12, 2010 Share Posted May 12, 2010 (edited) NO PROBLEM JACK, IF IT CAN BE WORKED OUT BY THE ADMINISTRATION, IN FACT GREAT IDEA...BEST B MORE THAN A THOUSAND Edited May 12, 2010 by Bernice Moore Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dean Hagerman Posted May 12, 2010 Share Posted May 12, 2010 I agree not to reply Great idea Jack I look forward to your pictures and studies Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David G. Healy Posted May 12, 2010 Share Posted May 12, 2010 (edited) Last night in my "third" Mac (formerly number one) I was looking for LHO autopsyphotos, and I found an LHO folder with more than a thousand LHO photos and studies. Many of them date back thirty years or more. The LHO folder also includes Marguerite, Marina, and Robert Oswald. The thought occurred to me that present day researchers might like to see and study them, if a way existed to present them UNCLUTTERED BY REPLIES, DISCUSSION, AND CONTROVERSY. I would present each image with only minimal identification. I would title the thread THE OSWALD FILE. Images would be random and added as I have time. So I thought that IF members would agree NOT TO REPLY IN A DEDICATED THREAD, but copy each photo they want to discuss and start a new thread for that purpose, I would do so. If not, such a thread would become highly unwieldy. I am not interested in discussing the photos and studies IN A THREAD WHERE I POST THEM, but only if others want to discuss them under the proposed conditions on threads that they start. Would members agree to such a dedicated thread? How could it be enforced so that only I could post to it? Could more image space be allotted to it? I think that members might find it interesting to see some of these images. Jack a great idea, however, I doubt an 'exclusive' thread would get off the ground.... lest-wise it didn't get approved when I requested one concerning Roland Zavada and his freshly minted, new and approved Zavada Report (which was never released, wonder why?). I'd break the photos down to time periods (your call) then post 3-4 in a single thread, a new thread every other day. No comment from you, just a simple caption for each photo.... those that care to comment can so, in that particular (3-4 image) thread. Obviously you can comment in a separate thread... Great idea, Jack.... David Edited May 12, 2010 by David G. Healy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joel D. Gruhn Posted May 12, 2010 Share Posted May 12, 2010 Jack, there is an add-on to IP Board (the message board software used here) that provides a photo gallery - exactly what you want. A full description is at http://www.invisionpower.com/products/gallery/ cost is ~ $65; it could be a central place for many photos galleries. Having it an integral part of the board software would, in my humble opinion, make it easier to moderate. I am wondering if we need to pass the hat. Joel D. Gruhn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Graves Posted May 13, 2010 Share Posted May 13, 2010 Damn fine idea. Can't imagine why anybody wouldn't agree not to reply. _________________________________________ As long as photos aren't misidentified. --Thomas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie Vegas Posted May 13, 2010 Share Posted May 13, 2010 That would be amazing Jack. Thank you so much! I would love the opportunity to view your collection. Best,, Frankie. P.S agree not to reply. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Burnham Posted May 13, 2010 Share Posted May 13, 2010 Jack, there is an add-on to IP Board (the message board software used here) that provides a photo gallery - exactly what you want. A full description is at http://www.invisionpower.com/products/gallery/ cost is ~ $65; it could be a central place for many photos galleries. Having it an integral part of the board software would, in my humble opinion, make it easier to moderate. I am wondering if we need to pass the hat. Joel D. Gruhn That's what we have at the JFKresearch Assassination Forum and it works very well. JFKresearch Assassination Forum Photo Gallery Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Kingsbury Posted May 13, 2010 Share Posted May 13, 2010 Brilliant Idea Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Griffin Posted May 14, 2010 Share Posted May 14, 2010 Sounds great, Jack! Thanks for offering to share them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now