Lewis Reynolds Posted October 28, 2017 Share Posted October 28, 2017 Scroll down to the video with evidence that LHO was the lone shooter: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/retropolis/wp/2017/10/27/strippers-surveillance-and-assassination-plots-the-jfk-files-wildest-documents/?utm_term=.7a67bc5ac514 No evidence at all. Still plugging away at the 'true' story....sigh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff Carter Posted October 28, 2017 Share Posted October 28, 2017 The Washington Post correspondent manages several outright falsehoods during his rather short presentation. "Oswald was the only employee who fled the building" - that is incorrect. In the Texas Theater "he pulls that pistol out and tries to shoot more policemen" - that is incorrect. There are "dozens" of pieces of evidence to prove Oswald was the assassin - that is incorrect. This is notable because the Washington Post has been leading a reaction against "fake news", including editorializing in favour of forms of censorship or blacklisting of designated "fake news" outlets. In contrast, the World Socialist Web Site has run two stories this week on the case, both of which provide more factual information than most of the mainstream media offerings: http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2017/10/27/kenn-o27.html http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2017/10/28/kenn-o28.html The WSWS has, of course, been designated a "fake news" site and targeted by Google's algorithm adjustments which have greatly reduced referrals to "non-authoritative" information sources (Google referrals reduced 70% almost overnight this summer and WSWS removed from the Google News aggregator). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lewis Reynolds Posted October 28, 2017 Author Share Posted October 28, 2017 (edited) Thanks Jeff, indeed most of what was said in the Washington Post video was rubbish. The second wsws.org article is an interesting read, and good to see truth in the media. Edited October 28, 2017 by Lewis Reynolds Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Walton Posted October 28, 2017 Share Posted October 28, 2017 I have a question about that doc that's mentioned in the article where when they're interviewing Helms and when they ask him about LHO's CIA connections and it cuts off. Is that a recently released doc or has it been around? If it's old, on which site is it hosted? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Clark Posted October 28, 2017 Share Posted October 28, 2017 A Wikimedia Search Engine is in order, where research material, and media publications are rated and weeded-out by researchers, or at least tagged with critical observations and commentary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Walton Posted October 28, 2017 Share Posted October 28, 2017 1 hour ago, Michael Clark said: A Wikimedia Search Engine is in order, where research material, and media publications are rated and weeded-out by researchers, or at least tagged with critical observations and commentary. Although Mary Ferrell has everything that's actually a great idea especially because of the tree branching. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lawrence Schnapf Posted October 29, 2017 Share Posted October 29, 2017 If I was a subscriber to the Washington Post, I would flag the article with #JFKFakeNews and #MassmediaJFKlies Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Trejo Posted October 30, 2017 Share Posted October 30, 2017 (edited) On 10/29/2017 at 10:07 AM, Lawrence Schnapf said: If I was a subscriber to the Washington Post, I would flag the article with #JFKFakeNews and #MassmediaJFKlies The CT community has always had a difficult time with the fact that our Mass Media for more than a half-century has consistently concluded that Lee Harvey Oswald alone was the JFK assassin. The most common idea broadcast about Lee Harvey Oswald was that he was a Marxist -- despite the fact that he had no Marxist memberships or associates, but only associates on the Radical Right (as demonstrated conclusively by Jim Garrison in 1968, and confirmed by Joan Mellen in 2005). The facts don't matter to the Mass Media. For the CT community, this fact oddly confirms the Trump doctrine that US Mass Media is a Fake News factory. Regards, --Paul Trejo Edited October 30, 2017 by Paul Trejo typos Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Josephs Posted October 30, 2017 Share Posted October 30, 2017 (edited) On 10/28/2017 at 2:15 PM, Michael Walton said: I have a question about that doc that's mentioned in the article where when they're interviewing Helms and when they ask him about LHO's CIA connections and it cuts off. Is that a recently released doc or has it been around? If it's old, on which site is it hosted? Not sure but you may be talking about this that was debunked a while back... Edited December 13, 2017 by David Josephs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lawrence Schnapf Posted October 31, 2017 Share Posted October 31, 2017 this memo has been established as a fake. Bogus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Walton Posted October 31, 2017 Share Posted October 31, 2017 19 hours ago, David Josephs said: Not sure but you may be talking about this that was debunked a while back... Sandy Larsen confirmed on another thread that the Richard Helms testimony doc does not cut off like this lazy WAPO story suggests. That's the doc I was speaking of but thanks anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Bauer Posted October 31, 2017 Share Posted October 31, 2017 (edited) 7 hours ago, Lawrence Schnapf said: this memo has been established as a fake. Bogus. Excuse my neophyte ignorance, but if the document above is bogus, was it revealed as bogus quickly, easily and long ago? Who discovered it as such and what are the speculations regards it's origins and agenda? Just curious. Edited October 31, 2017 by Joe Bauer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lawrence Schnapf Posted October 31, 2017 Share Posted October 31, 2017 i dont remember precisely when it was determined to be a fake but its been several years-perhaps at lease a decade Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now