Jump to content
The Education Forum

The inevitable end result of our last 56 years


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 18.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Benjamin Cole

    2003

  • Douglas Caddy

    1990

  • W. Niederhut

    1700

  • Steve Thomas

    1562

8 minutes ago, Sandy Larsen said:

 

The plot to discredit Hutchinson is working.

 

 

And it shouldn't matter. Hutchinson was obviously set up. There was no motive for her to make that incident up.

 

Sandy:

Well, we may have to agree to disagree. 

1. Possibly Hutchinson was "set up." That would mean Trump & Co.  were planning to set her up 18 months ago (moreover, when she was seen as loyal). Really? The Trump Team strikes me as unable to plan a bathroom break, let alone lay uncertain boobytraps a year-and-a-half in advance. 

The final result is egg on the face of the 1/6 Cheney-crats. 

2. Guns in the 1/6 scrum. This is such a weak reed, and discredited on the face of it. Zero photo evidence. Monkeys in trees (with blurred faces) does not count as evidence. 

The final result is egg on the face of 1/6 Cheney-crats. 

The Cheney-crats scheduled a special emergency TV show "bombshell" hearing...for this?  Discredited hearsay evidence? 

Bombshells away! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Benjamin Cole said:

Possibly Hutchinson was "set up." That would mean Trump & Co.  were planning to set her up 18 months ago (moreover, when she was seen as loyal). Really?

 

You make a good point.

I don't think they planned to discredit Hutchinson. I think that they just now are covering their a$$es, and/or trying to discredit her as an afterthought.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Benjamin Cole said:

The Cheney-crats scheduled a special emergency TV show "bombshell" hearing...for this?  Discredited hearsay evidence?

 

That hearsay testimony is just a small part of new Hutchinson testimony incriminating Trump. And while hearsay testimony isn't admissible in court, it does reveal information that may help the AG build a case. Remember, Hutchinson isn't the only witness to the things she saw and heard.

 

BTW, for somebody who drinks from neither the red nor the blue koolaid, you sure do like to counter anything that incriminates the right. Or is it just what incriminates the Donald. LOL

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let us consider the possibility that Tony Orlando and Bobby Hatfield actually did a sting on Hutchinson on Jan.6th.

They fed her a false story about Trump going bananas in the Presidential limo ( the Beast) and Hutchinson took it hook line and sinker.

Wanting to see if she was a "leaker."

So, Hutchinson ( under oath ) tells the Jan.6th committee and the world the "truth" that Orlando "did" tell her this epic Moby Dick whale struggle in "The BEAST" tale. 

And for what ( or whom ) was that "Beast" label intended? The Presidential limo...or it's designated occupant?

So, if Hutchinson was set up with a false story, who looks more corrupt and at fault with this scenario? 

Hutchinson...or the Trump dirty deed doing "Beasty Boys?"

And Ms. Hutchinson would have to be a completely mentally unstable person to make up all 15 of her mind blowing Trump and team craziness stories she shared yesterday in the hearing.

Edited by Joe Bauer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reuters---

The New York Times and NBC, citing sources in the Secret Service, said the head of Trump's security detail, Robert Engel, and the limousine driver were prepared to testify under oath that Trump never lunged for the steering wheel. Engel was in the room when Ornato relayed the story, Hutchinson said.

The New York Times and CNN, citing unnamed sources, said Ornato also denied the story and was willing to testify.

---30---

The 1/6 Cheney-crat Committee has laid an egg, which it then rubbed on its own face. 

Going out in style. Put your feet up, crack open can--it's Mueller Time! 

(Apols to the old beer brewer, Miller). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Benjamin Cole said:

Reuters---

The New York Times and NBC, citing sources in the Secret Service, said the head of Trump's security detail, Robert Engel, and the limousine driver were prepared to testify under oath that Trump never lunged for the steering wheel. Engel was in the room when Ornato relayed the story, Hutchinson said.

The New York Times and CNN, citing unnamed sources, said Ornato also denied the story and was willing to testify.

---30---

The 1/6 Cheney-crat Committee has laid an egg, which it then rubbed on its own face. 

Going out in style. Put your feet up, crack open can--it's Mueller Time! 

(Apols to the old beer brewer, Miller). 

So Ms. Hutchinson simply embellished her recollection testimony with this added steering wheel grab story?

Sorry, the young woman is not that dumb, that desperate or that unstable.

Trump is the unstable one...and these two clowns Toretto and Angle know it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Benjamin Cole said:

Reuters---

The New York Times and NBC, citing sources in the Secret Service, said the head of Trump's security detail, Robert Engel, and the limousine driver were prepared to testify under oath that Trump never lunged for the steering wheel. Engel was in the room when Ornato relayed the story, Hutchinson said.

The New York Times and CNN, citing unnamed sources, said Ornato also denied the story and was willing to testify.

---30---

The 1/6 Cheney-crat Committee has laid an egg, which it then rubbed on its own face. 

Going out in style. Put your feet up, crack open can--it's Mueller Time! 

(Apols to the old beer brewer, Miller). 

Was Hutchinson also set up with a false story of Trump throwing his MacDonald's french fries/ketchup plate at the wall by this "valet?"

The valet was another leaker trapping "sting" participent?

And by the way...that dish Trump hurled and smashed to pieces belonged to us American citizens. We paid for that plate which was for sure a high end one. Was Trump billed for that destroyed plate?

As Ruth Paine once said about Oswald doing something bad "in her house, and on her typewriter!"  ... "It offended me deeply."

Edited by Joe Bauer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Joe Bauer said:

Was Hutchinson also set up with a false story of Trump throwing his MacDonald french fries/ketchup plate at the wall by this "valet?"

The valet was another leaker trapping "sting" participent?

And by the way...that dish Trump hurled and smashed to pieces belonged to us American citizens. We paid for that plate which was for sure a high end one. Was Trump billed for that destroyed plate?

As Ruth Paine said about Oswald doing something bad "in her house, and on her typewriter!"  ... "It offended me deeply."

I am deeply offended that Trump may have thrown an official White House porcelain plate against a wall, and at the apparition of Mr Buffalo Horns. 

That said, the 1/6 Cheney-crat Committee has so much egg on its face it should open up a breakfast diner.  

Bubelah, it is Mueller Time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Benjamin Cole said:

I am deeply offended that Trump may have thrown an official White House porcelain plate against a wall, and at the apparition of Mr Buffalo Horns. 

That said, the 1/6 Cheney-crat Committee has so much egg on its face it should open up a breakfast diner.  

Bubelah, it is Mueller Time. 

How does the committee have egg on it's face?

If Ms. Hutchinson lied, made up or simply repeated a false story fed to her in a "leaker" catching sting operation by Starsky and Hutch ... none of this reflects on their honest efforts to get to the honest truth bottom of who created, fed and neglected to protect the victims of that violent attack on our Capital building.

No matter if the Trump going bananas in the Beast tale was false, yet fed to Hutchinson in a dirty tricks way...they will not be tainted by it.

Instead, they were duped in a well thought out conspiracy way.

Keep in mind...who are the true bad guys here?

Edited by Joe Bauer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Joe Bauer said:

How does the committee have egg on it's face?

If Ms. Hutchinson lied, made up or simply repeated a false story fed to her in a "leaker" catching sting operation by Starsky and Hutch ... none of this reflects on their honest efforts to get to the honest truth bottom of who created, fed and neglected to protect the victims of that violent attack on our Capital building.

No matter if the Trump going bananas in the Beast tale was false, yet fed to Hutchinson in a dirty tricks way...they will not be tainted by it.

Instead, they were duped in a well thought out conspiracy way.

Keep in mind...who are the true bad guys here?

Why the 1/6 Cheney-crat Omlette Face Deluxe?

Don't you think they should minimally check out testimony and witnesses before they air such with credulity on national TV? 

This was presented as another "explosive bombshell!"

Then, the M$M ran with it...and AR-15s brandished in the 1/6 scrum (which nobody has any evidence of)! 

The National Enquirer meets the 1/6 Weekly Soap Show

Trump strikes me as a clown. I am glad he is out of office and if he is sentenced to jail after a fair trial, so be it. 

But the Deep State runs the show, and strikes me as dangerous. 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Benjamin Cole said:

Then, the M$M ran with it...and AR-15s brandished in the 1/6 scrum (which nobody has any evidence of)!

 

The evidence for the AR-15 spotting were police audio tapes. Some of the police were reporting weapons they saw in the possession of Trump supporters, and AR-15 was among them. The 1/6 Committee played the tapes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...