Jump to content
The Education Forum

The inevitable end result of our last 56 years


Recommended Posts

When is Tucker Carlson going to show his audience footage behind the scenes ...  the office of General Charles Flynn, Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations, Plans and Training (G3/5/7) of the Army Staff from June 2019 to May 2021. at the Pentagon? 

Edited by Leslie Sharp
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 18.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Benjamin Cole

    2003

  • Douglas Caddy

    1990

  • W. Niederhut

    1700

  • Steve Thomas

    1562

1 hour ago, Leslie Sharp said:

Intellectual integrity is an aspect or part of integrity proper. It requires being. willing to stand up for your best judgment of the truth, by being willing to act in accordance with that judgment when the need arises. Like other intellectual virtues, intellectual integrity is a character trait.

Can you tell me that yourself or others have lived up to that standard in the past few days? We’ve all failed right? 
We need to do better....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Chris Barnard said:

Can you tell me that yourself or others have lived up to that standard in the past few days? We’ve all failed right? 
We need to do better....

You've not stood up to Matthew's disjointed attacks on facts -- i.e. truth -- presented.  You've psychoanalyzed the drama to death over the past few days, and yet, I do not have the slightest clue who you think plotted, executed, covered-up the assassination of Kennedy in Dallas, an attack on our presidency. Nor do I have any sense of your perspective - other than perhaps fence sitting -  of Trump's Jan 6 attack on our presidency.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Chris Barnard said:

https://www.politicalcompass.org
 

I am not claiming that this test is the gold standard of political leaning analysis but, it’s reasonably interesting. 
 

Here is my result:

https://www.politicalcompass.org/yourpoliticalcompass?ec=-2.75&soc=-4.36
 

 

Isn't it strange that, in effect, you choose to politicize the analysis of the parallels between the attack on Kennedy in Dallas and the attack on the presidency Jan 6 ... when the more logical discussion should be the yet resolved cold case investigation of the murder in Dallas which would, with a little work on your part, dovetail nicely with the theme of this thread, the inevitable end result of the past [60] years.

Edited by Leslie Sharp
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Leslie Sharp said:

You've not stood up to Matthew's disjointed attacks on facts -- i.e. truth -- presented.  You've psychoanalyzed the drama to death over the past few days, and yet, I do not have the slightest clue who you think plotted, executed, covered-up the assassination of Kennedy in Dallas, an attack on our presidency. Nor do I have any sense of your perspective - other than perhaps fence sitting -  of Trump's Jan 6 attack on our presidency.   

I am willing to take some responsibility in this feud, Leslie. It doesn’t seem you are. What hope do we have?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Leslie Sharp said:

Isn't it strange that, in effect you choose to politicize the analysis of the parallels between the attack on Kennedy in Dallas and the attack on the presidency Jan 6 ... when the more logical discussion should be the yet resolved cold case investigation of the murder in Dallas which would, with a little work on your part, dovetail nicely with the theme of this thread, the inevitable end result of the past [60] years.

In case you haven’t picked up on it, this thread hasn’t been about JFK for some time. The moderators define it as a ‘release valve’ for posters, where other things are debated. When I started it seemed like a thread dedicated to bashing the orange man. You’ll figure it out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Chris Barnard said:

I am willing to take some responsibility in this feud, Leslie. It doesn’t seem you are. What hope do we have?

The "feud" was baseless from the outset, and I believe you realize that now.  I also believe, if you're honest and pause to carefully review Matthew's first round of insults, you might ask why he jumped all over the Postscript in Coup.  This is complicated, Chris, and maybe you're just too pure of heart to recognize bad actors when they surface in your world. Hank knew them when he met them ... not paranoia, just years of experience with them.  I've been pursuing the assassination investigation since 1993, so this is not my first rodeo as they say in my neck of the woods.

This is how a reasonable initial salvo from Matthew might have  read ... "say, Leslie, can you confirm that Roy Cohn was Trump's business and political mentor?"  "Can you confirm that Roger Stone admired and learned at the feet of Cohn?"  Can you prove that Regnery Publishing published three Holocaust Denial screeds? and that Bill Regnery, initiator of the "alt-right", lauded Trump for legitimising White Nationalism?" 
 

You know, basic, legitimate challenges?

Edited by Leslie Sharp
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Leslie Sharp said:

Whataboutism is somewhat reasonable in many circumstances, but a major stretch here. Was Epps' a confidant and advisor of President Trump? Was he ensconced  at the Willard with the Trump team who had initiated the Stop the Steal scheme days before the election? I kinda think Epps is the straw man the shaman wished he himself had been — a couple of notches up the food chain so his indictment might have taken a bit longer?

Who is alleged to have been Epps' handler?  Stone perhaps?

And if I can just say again, there were thousands and thousands of people at the rally and subsequent insurrection, and you're suggesting — at the instigation of Tucker — Epps is the threat?  Show me dozens of "Epps" and I'll pay a bit more attention.  So far I've only heard innuendo.

I keep hearing about the Willard Hotel meeting, of Trumpers.

But what was discussed inside that meeting? (Was Stone present)?

Are you conjecturing, or do you have a tape, or do you have a non-hearsay witness statement as to discussions inside the Willard Hotel?

Are thought crimes crime? That is, if constitutional scholar Eastman generated some dubious constitutional plans...but nothing was effected...then what?

Biden has been running the Justice Department for two years. Where are they on this? 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Leslie Sharp said:

The "feud" was baseless from the outset, and I believe you realize that now.  I also believe, if you're honest and pause to carefully review Matthew's first round of insults, you might ask why he jumped all over the Postscript in Coup.  This is complicated, Chris, and maybe you're just too pure of heart to recognize bad actors when they surface in your world. Hank knew them when he met them ... not paranoia, just years of experience with them.  I've been pursuing the assassination investigation since 1993, so this is not my first rodeo as they say in my neck of the woods.

My genuine opinion is, you feel slighted and you don’t want to let it go. Despite some barbs you threw my way, I feel very dispassionate and fine to move on from the silliness. Can you do the same? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dow futures jump 250 points as regulators announce backstop of SVB depositors: Live updates

100% bailout of depositors. The Biden Administration diktat. 

Was this a "Natzi bank"?  I think that thought had emerged here. 

Biden a Natzi? 

Or was SVB a "woke" bank, with connections o the Donk Party? 

Let the spinning begin.....

The red-blue pissing wars, variant #12,398.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Benjamin Cole said:

I keep hearing about the Willard Hotel meeting, of Trumpers.

But what was discussed inside that meeting? (Was Stone present)?

Are you conjecturing, or do you have a tape, or do you have a non-hearsay witness statement as to discussions inside the Willard Hotel?

Are thought crimes crime? That is, if constitutional scholar Eastman generated some dubious constitutional plans...but nothing was effected...then what?

Biden has been running the Justice Department for two years. Where are they on this? 

 

 

 

I'll walk you through this.  We'll stay with the Pence related aspect of this multi-thronged plan to disrupt the peaceful transfer of presidential power - an attack on the presidency parallel with Dallas 1963.

  • John Eastman was ensconced in the Willard Hotel along with others who - as established through testimony including that of Trump administration officials — had, since days prior to the election — determined to "stop the steal" - a concept devised by dirty trickster and Kennedy assassination researcher Roger Stone.
  • Eastman is the author of the "Eastman Memo", 6 points to persuade Mike Pence that (paraphrasing) he had the authority to refuse the electoral count seen here. https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/21066248-eastman-memo
  • During his rant at the elipse (yes, it was a rant of significant magnitude for an outgoing president), Trump whose war room team including Eastman had been strategizing at the Willard referred specifically to  Vice President Pence, warning him that he had better do the right thing, thus riling up those who would soon become insurrectionists — many of whom had avoided the detection system giving them the opportunity to march armed to the Capitol.
  • Some among them erected a gallows and launched a chant "Hang Mike Pence" while approaching and subsequently entering the building unlawfully.

    So, I would ask you, why would an outgoing administration find it necessary, let alone appropriate, to be holed up in the Willard unless it was to attempt to overthrow our democracy.
     

A snippet from (and you will love this) the World Socialist — but hey, equal airtime seems to be the mantra of Carlson loyalists. . . 

' . . . A conservative lawyer working with then-President Donald Trump’s legal team tried to convince then-Vice President Mike Pence that he could overturn the election results on January 6 when Congress counted the Electoral College votes by throwing out electors from seven states, according to the new book “Peril” from Washington Post journalists Bob Woodward and Robert Costa.

The scheme put forward by controversial lawyer John Eastman was outlined in a two-page memo obtained by the authors for “Peril,” and which was subsequently obtained by CNN. The memo, which has not previously been made public, provides new detail showing how Trump and his team tried to persuade Pence to subvert the Constitution and throw out the election results on January 6.'

Biden is a seasoned politician with his finger on the pulse and I believe he is a) allowing Garland time to dot I's and cross t's, and or b) concerned enough about the possibility of a full blown deadly civil war that he would choose the lesser of two evils . . . guarantee that Trump cannot hold elected office again, and move on. A scorpion's embrace.

Edited by Leslie Sharp
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Benjamin Cole said:

Dow futures jump 250 points as regulators announce backstop of SVB depositors: Live updates

100% bailout of depositors. The Biden Administration diktat. 

Was this a "Natzi bank"?  I think that thought had emerged here. 

Biden a Natzi? 

Or was SVB a "woke" bank, with connections o the Donk Party? 

Let the spinning begin.....

The red-blue pissing wars, variant #12,398.....

Who pulled out their entire deposits at SVB, precipitating the final collapse, Ben? Thiel.

Who does Thiel turn to for inspiration? And what better way to topple our democracy than another 2008.  N-azi indeed.

Curtis Yarvin wants American democracy toppled. He has some prominent Republican fans.

The New Right blogger has been cited by Blake Masters and J.D. Vance. What exactly is he advocating?
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/23373795/curtis-yarvin-neoreaction-redpill-moldbug

an interesting read . . . 'Such a view of history is shared by accelerationism –– a term most commonly associated with the cultural theorist Nick Land, but also prominent in the writing of neo-reactionary blogger Curtis Yarvin and others in the radical right milieu . . . ' and, Ben, in the event you're unaware, the Rene Guenon mentioned here harkens to the ultra-traditional French Catholics identified in Coup.
 
https://www.versobooks.com/blogs/5512-julius-evola-s-reactionary-revolt-against-the-modern-world

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Leslie and the other hanging on to their propaganda commission on a JFK forum is so Ironically hilarious. The J6 commission and the Warren Commission are so similar it's actually really funny! Basically Leslie and Ron asking for more footage is like saying you need more Zapruder film to prove Kennedy wasn't shot from behind.

Sorry you guys can't understand the big picture that j6 has about as many holes in it as the Warren Commission report😉💯 Even funnier is the fact that you guys are doubling down on the commission not realizing that if it was actually a coup Rodger Stone and others would have been charged with Treason.. But I guess when you identify as "Woke" micro aggressions count as the real thing.. HUH?! In reality White Nationalism when translated from Wokeness is just white people who don't hate their country. It really is amazing that someone can throw around very serious allegation like White Supremacy on this forum without citing anything of real substance or making the case but what do you expect from people who think Colin Kappernick is a freedom fighter!?

All I have learned is that Leslie can use anything to justify her behavior and she is basically an authoritarian that has alot of similarities to the members of the Third Reich she claims to be against, She would have made a great prison guard or train conductor in 1940's Germany. Meanwhile back to reality that's basically what I would expect from someone who literally worked for white supremest HL Hunt. The closest I have employment wise to that is working for a corporation, Leslie we are not the same.. in fact I'm pretty sure the goddess you thanked was Shiva the Destroyer given your behavior the last couple of days!  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...