• Announcements

    • Evan Burton


      We have 5 requirements for registration: 1.Sign up with your real name. (This will be your Username) 2.A valid email address 3.Your agreement to the Terms of Use, seen here: http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=21403. 4. Your photo for use as an avatar  5.. A brief biography. We will post these for you, and send you your password. We cannot approve membership until we receive these. If you are interested, please send an email to: edforumbusiness@outlook.com We look forward to having you as a part of the Forum! Sincerely, The Education Forum Team

Robin Unger

  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Robin Unger

  • Rank
    Super Member

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
  • ICQ

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location

Recent Profile Visitors

16,324 profile views
  1. The Ruby didn't shoot Oswald theory is garbage. To show how far the madness has gone, Cinque and his supporters actually believe that Bookhout not Ruby shot Oswald, and that he was using blanks as part of some giant charade by the DPD
  2. I believe Beers might have been standing on the railing at the right, as his camera appears to have been looking down on the bystanders.
  3. Jack Beers images showing the location of the mic.
  4. The image showing the mic was taken from an elevated view looking down on the subjects. ( that is why the mic is visible ) the other image was taken at ground level looking at the subjects and did not capture the mic.
  5. http://quaneeri.blogspot.com.au/2017/01/beers-jackson-composite.html http://quaneeri.blogspot.com.au/2017/01/nbc-steve-alexander.html
  6. In Altgens 6 Lovelady was standing next to the hand rail which is where we see him in Wiegman. he only appears to be closer to Carl Jones because Altgens was using a 105mm telephoto lens which produced a forshortening effect in the photo.
  7. Wiegman composite. In Wiegman the bystanders were lined up in a row, from the traffic light across to the corner of the tsbd
  8. Credit: Tony Fratini
  9. Area of tiled wall corresponding to the depth of the top landing.
  10. sounds like you are just trolling this thread Thomas, trying to take it off topic.
  11. Tony Fratini calculation has the depth of the top landing at 4.3'
  12. Where is Frazier in Wiegman ? is he also up against the glass, hidden in the shadows ?
  13. This was just posted by Duncan. quote: What Depth Was The TSBD Landing On November 22nd 1963? This is a Gif I made of Dan Rather opening the TSBD glass door exit /entrance, and then walking on to the steps. Unfortunately, the landing is not in view. He does however appears to take two similar length strides/footsteps from the door exit/entrance before going down on to the top step. As the average human stride/footstep, according to most information sources I have researched is approximately 31 inches, that would make the depth of the landing from the glass door to the top step be approximately 5ft and a bit. I did a test myself, and I can verify that this estimate is a reasonable calculation.
  14. I have seen a comment on one of the forums stating that the depth of the landing was (5) - feet ?