Karl Kinaski

Mack Interview 2003...At 20.min, when it comes to Oswald, Macks begins his quibbel...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n213uWG4bRY He is out to confuse people...to left them behind in a state of confusion...

BS...isn't it? http://www.amazon.com/Kaleidoscope-Review-Douglas-Assassination-Records/product-reviews/1481012274/ref=cm_cr_dp_see_all_btm?ie=UTF8&showViewpoints=1&sortBy=bySubmissionDateDescending

There are (probably) many things I disagreed with Jack White about, but he and I got along fine, and there were clearly many things we agreed upon. Also, Jack White, being from Texas, was clearly skeptical of the character and motivations of Lyndon Johnson, years--if not decades--before it became "fashionable" to go down that path. Bottom line, and FWIW: I don't think Jack White would ever alter a photograph to advance his own, or another's research. That was simply not in his character. He might disagree with you on the interpretation of something, but he would never alter evidence. FWIW: That's my opinion. DSL 5/18/15 - 5:55 p.m. Los Angeles, California Jack White was an ardent supporter of Armstrongs "Two Ossis only" Theory (which adds nothing to solve the crime in Dallas, and distracts attention away from it.). To which dubious degree, everybody can check in the famous "Judyth Baker in exile" thread of this forum. White got lost in Armstrongs trap... KK

Quote from the article: Close quote Mr Burnham: description of the "real Zapruder film"...please...to lift the veils of secrecy...we are waiting for that since way back... KK

edit

From Gary Mack: "Carr was a fraud. From his location on the sixth floor of the Cabell building, the sniper's nest window was blocked from view as was most of the TSBD. No part of Houston Street could be seen from where he was because of another building in the way. And yes, both buildings are still there and anyone can see that what I've told you is true." Carr said, he saw that incident, after he got off the construction, standing on street level. He is no fraud. His statements were distorted. KK

I think you are right... The TSBD Dougherty was maybe to unimportant to call a Dulles directly...on the other hand, he is the only 5th/ 6th floor guy without an alibi for the seconds the shots rang out... But there is no proof yet, that Dulles had phone contact with Jack R. or Jack E. Dougherty... KK

Just a trail balloon: here we have the most suspicious TSBD 6th/ 5th floor guy, Jack Dougherty, the only one without an alibi for the time of the shooting, and there is Dulles...Jack Doughertys Name appears just once in the correspondence_Appointment_Call_Diaries_1945-1968 (of Allan Dulles) BTW This Diaries are very interesting. They show Dulles was a busy man in the month prior to the assassination. There were phone calls and meetings with Angleton, Ray Rocca, Howard Hunt, Thomas Karamessines, Cord Meyer, Frank Wisner, Samuel Pryor...etc. AND they show: by the end oft Okt, and the beginning of Nov. 1963 Dulles was in Texas for 5 days. In Forth Worth, Huston and Dallas. (Under the Cover to present his book THE CRAFT OF INTELLIGENCE...) KK

From Index of /~mudd/finding_aids/MC019.09/Correspondence_Appointment_Call_Diaries_1945-1968 (of Allan Dulles) quote: THURSDAY & FRIDAY, April 18-19, 1963 Schedule : Mr. Dulles departed Washington, Thursday at 12:15 via Allegheny Airlines, for Trenfon, -tB attend -== - Princeton Trustees' meetingson 18 and 19 April and to address Graduate School on Thursday evening, Telephone : /Clark Clifford. Will call again. Robert Cutler. Will call Mr. Dulles at Princeton Inn. (of California) Mr, Jack Dougherty, San Diego, California. mer 33, 582-4411. Will call again. close quote Here is the Linkhttp://www.princeton.edu/~mudd/finding_aids/MC019.09/Correspondence_Appointment_Call_Diaries_1945-1968/19630417_0000034461.pdf Warren Commission Testimony of Jack Dougherty Conclusion; Allan Dulles was in contact with at last one TSBD man prior to the assassination. KK

Beware of stone throwing and car burning CIA provocateurs, artificial riots and and and...it could be a hot November in Dallas... KK

Quote Graves: A speculation: Was it a radio, or was it a hidden flechette device? DCM was in the best position to fire a flechette against Kennedys neck. He was IN the street nearly in front of him...the second, Kennedy was hit in the neck DCMs right Hand was on his belt buckle...a belt buckle flechette device?...a flechette shot from a belt buckle?...why not...Umbrella Man could have been just a agent of distraction... KK

http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=20185&hl=thompson

It is now down for half a month...hmmm... KK

@ first video. Wow. TIME_LIFE-Darling Thompson is a funny old man. No need to trust his fancy theories anymore. I regard him as a Fake-CTer sent out by the other side to calm down the then rapidly growing CTer community with a "scandalous" CTer book. (In 1967...). Note: it is always suspicious, when a dedicated CTer finds open each and every door of MSM Institutions like TIME-LIFE. The most devastating CTer books, because of providing misleading half truths, or a bit to artificial conspiracy theories are: Six seconds in Dallas and John Armstrongs Harvey and Lee. The are as misleading as the manipulated crap, we know as the Zapruder film, implemented into our brains by Robert Groden, or the the confused bunch of files, called the Pentagon Papers. CTers: beware of the Ellsbergs, Grodens, Armstrongs and Thompsons of this world, those old folks, posing as truth seekers, when they are the contrary. (Note: Ellsberg was a student of Ed Landsdale...) KK

@Joseph McBride: since your book deals a lot with the picket fence area (your theorie is, that badge man was Tippit) and the pergola in front, I am a little bit perplex that you don't mention the following picket fence main-witnesses: Jean Hill Beverly Oliver Ed Hoffman Richard Dodd James Simmons J.S. Price J.M. Smith and S. Weitzman (regarding the parking lot), you mention only once, quote: "...gunmen firing from the grassy knoll were chased into the parking lot by Joe m. Smith and ()Seymour Weitzman..." That's it. Lee Bowers you only mention twice...quote: 1"...little people, like(...) Lee Bowers, those are the real heroes of the case..." and: 2. "Lee Bowers(...)saw a buff of smoke, or a flash of light at the edge of the fence..." That's it. At great length you mention only Gordon Arnold and Evelyn King, quote, kindle version of your book: "Into the Nightmare":

"The bay of pigs", showing the IC-Establishment trying to fool the freshman president, would be a big 3th movie. Costner as Charles Cabell... BTW: 13 days failed to show the Russian side... KK

Judyth Baker was advised to tell her story ME AND LEE as fiction. She declined. Tosh Plumee should have done the same. KK

kindle version MAN OF A MILLION FRAGMENTS keen!

Quote: THE KENNEDY ASSASSINATION COVER UP, by Donald Gibson page 164. The guys surrounding Oswald in NOLA in 1963 where all together very close...

Stephen Roy: I would like your book coming out this year, to compare it with the Baker book to conceive a kind of final opinion about Ferrie. There is a lot of stuff about Ferrie in Bakers recent book, and it all sounds right to me... It is not my intention to add fuel to the fire of the personal feud between Baker and you. My sympathies are not on the side of a particular person, but on the side of the better argument. Thx.

The topic is not Roy vs Garrison, it is Roy vs Baker. To compare their Ferrie-books will be an intellectual adventure... KK

Another possibility would be to put the full interviews online...I would pay for such a site...

That's always a good question...by selecting interviews, or parts of it, which means suppressing interviews, or parts of it, texts on the JFK assassination are getting tendentious. Obvious example: The Warren Report. There should be an additional issue of such books, as Manchesters "The Dead of a president", with all the interview stuff in it...but I hardly believe that Palamara or McBride will start with it. KK

Karl Kinaski Yes - I ll put it on the Ed-forum thx...fact is: Ferrie had a car to his disposal in the summer of 1963 and you sat in that car...Stephen Roys hairsplitting arguments about that fact are no longer important to me...

edit