Michael Walton

Uhh, no, Micah. You're reading way too much into this with way too many so-called "experts" saying it's this or that or something else. It's his head, Micah. The back of his head. That round shape is the blowout from the bullet hole. Look at my illustration above. It's not hard to figure out. That's a flap, Micah, with the bone underneath. Pat Speer wrote about this too. Look it up on his website.

Since we are on the head wounds here, I wanted to put this up. I have always thought this was a decent illustration of two photos combined, not because I made it, but because the so-called "mystery" photo - who Baden couldn't even orient in 1978 (and BTW, every time I see that guy advertised on a TV show I never watch his xxxx) - HAS to be oriented some how. Meaning, if we are to believe that that photo is genuine (and I think it is) then it has to somehow be reconciled with the other autopsy photos that are available. So this illustration below is that reconciliation. PS - this is a large animated GIF so let it load as it may take a moment if you're on a slow connection speed: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B7Hr9Lrku-Cxdm9ZalJTSWU3cms

Mike - this is a particularly useful video IMO. Did you make it? Yes

This breaking news sounds like pure Italian hokum to me.

I'm not saying here that it's impossible for a rear shot to the head to not make a head move backward. But this show is par for the course, meaning it's utter horsexxxx. Ballistics gel in no way mimics the actual human body with gristle, bone, and taunt muscles. All you have to do is look at the Z film to see that JFK - before 313 - was not a blubbery mass of rubber bouncing here and to. He was actually stunned and looks stiffened...how do we know that? Watch his right arm collapse when the head shot hits. So he was not a blubbery mass like this xxxxing show portrays it to be. Meanwhile, how do you explain live human bodies reacting to a shot from the front as well as the back as seen below? https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B7Hr9Lrku-CxNm9MNTY3UHVrR1k and https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B7Hr9Lrku-CxU0V1ck1GZFN6TWM

This belongs over in the Math or Egypt forums. Or in a new one called My Fantasy World.

Chris and Dave, I stand by what I said earlier. The case was not all that hard to pull off. You set the stage, get a patsy in place, the shooters come out and do what they do, then fade away. The government, in cahoots with the media did the rest, causing subterfuge for the past 50 plus years. That's all. People like you two and many others (the Harvey and Lee crowd; the Jackie shot JFK crowd; and many others) have grossly muddled this case, ruining the outstanding work that's been done by real researchers. So yes, this thread deserves to be pinned at the top of this forum so that folks can read what really happen before they start finding the silliness like the Z film was recorded at 48 FPS and 67% of the frames were removed, that blobs were painted onto the film, that Oswald had a clone from Hungary, and the clone's Mom had a unibrow and smiled a lot, and all of the other nonsense (e.g., muck).

This thread should be renamed The Kennedy Assassination A Primer and pinned to the top of this forum. Not only does JD cover the case well but Giglio has some outstanding links to other resources. Yet, only 300 odd views of it. Meanwhile, the craziness and zaniness on this forum continues with, for example, Chris carrying on with the ridiculous Towner Frame Split thread - 13,000 views and counting. That's why it's even more important to pin this to the top so there's some kind of balance before visitors start wading through the muck.

I recently led the effort at the company I work for to live stream an event on Facebook. It happened this past week after planning it for almost one year. Have you ever thought about putting this event on Facebook Live for those who cannot attend?

Mike, come on. This whole forum is about the JFK assassination. We should try to stick to that topic. Test out your new-fangled software or gadget or gizmo elsewhere. You have plenty of off-line options. Then when it works and if you want to somehow incorporate this gizmo into your JFK research, great. I mean think about it. You and me and others are not the only ones who visit this site. Tom Graves also called you out a while back on how you posted 7 or 10 empty "reserve" posts on a thread. It was like - WTF? There should be a certain etiquette to *how* you use a forum and Graves's call out and mine are two examples of how you don't seem to understand or are too stubborn to consider the point we're trying to get across. But now you'll once again accuse me of being arrogant or a playground basher or whatever without holding up the mirror to see the point I and others have tried to make with you all along.

Meanwhile, Dulles -- for some unexplained reason -- was operating out of a secret CIA facility in northern Virginia on that fateful day, even though Kennedy had pushed him out of government two years before. And then he goes on to be part of the WC. Talk about the fox guarding the hen house.

When it works, great, then use it. Don't make it a post though - it just disrupts the thread. Who cares if you're "testing" something. I don't and I'm sure others don't either.

ANDREWS: Good to see the Krock article, Jim. Often that article is cited as anti-CIA and the source of warnings that the CIA was too powerful and interfering, but it's clear from reading Krock that his is an equivocating response to Richard Starnes' courageous work. Krock is doing damage control, goading Kennedy, and stealing Starnes' glory, all in one shot. If a plot against Kennedy were not already underway, this piece would be a serious incitement to war between the Agency and the Executive. I don't agree with your take that Krock was goading Kennedy. Krock was pretty loyal to the Kennedy family having been so since 20 years before. Based on that, I take it that the "high official" was someone very close to Kennedy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Krock MIKE CLARK: OMG you're actually "testing" computer things on a public forum?! Can't you just start a private blog like with Blogger and test there? This is NOT your personal playground, Mike! Jesus! Is it any wonder people are fleeing this forum in droves?

Not a word in Ramon's list about: Pat Speer (no nonsense and BS free) Gil Jesus (seemingly abandoned site but good stuff) Prayer Man site (the one and only true remaining "theory" that has a lot of potential but which a lot of conspiracy folks actually argue against...because well, they think everything is a conspiracy EXCEPT solid ones?) ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Your photo shows the spilled Coke on the ground. The other photo shows the cops with the bags of food. Sitzman states what she saw. She obviously was not watching them every single second as the car came down the street and sped on - who knows, they may have stood up or leaned on the wall to get a closer look as the car approached as seen in that photo known as Dog Man. Finally, from a plausible point of view, I cannot imagine the planners would put shooters or whoever that obvious and out in the open. If the plan was to frame LHO by making up the 6th floor nest with throw down spent shells, then they'd have to have been the dumbest plotters in the world by putting some shooters or whoever that obvious down there.

The one behind the retaining wall was supposedly a black couple that was watching the parade and eating their lunch, never to be seen nor heard from again:

Yes, we shall wait and see what happens in October. That is all we can do. Meanwhile, the comments on that article page are even more entertaining than the article itself. Here's a truly hilarious one (I believe the comment author is actually making fun of the way-out-there CT-ers found here) and reminds me of the comedic theories you can read on this very forum (such as the 67% Solution; Harvey and Lee; Tina Towner's Splice; Ruby didn't shoot Oswald; Ruby's nightclub basement was assassination HQ; and one of the old guys on the knoll had a black pistol in his hand during the shooting, among others): ARTICLE COMMENT: This is what I learned from our U.S. Gov teacher who was said to be a W.H. historian at onetime: 1) In early 1900,s, may be 1901, there was a sharp shooter at Russia, who for the most part, saved Russia from Mideast infiltration in the mountains 2) the sharp shooter could perform age reversal and lived multiple lives 3) the sharp shooter had been Samuel Adams, John Adams, John Hancock, a former Czar and a former king of Scandinavia, Herbert Hoover, Kafka and many others with multiple age reversals and resurrections 4) In early 1960,s, the sharp shooter became John Kennedy! 5) A group of Polish criminals (wanted for human poaching) had escaped to Scandinavia 6) In 1962, they infiltrated the "real" John Kennedy, took over his black phone book and contacts 7) One of the Polish criminal brothers took the real John Kennedy's identity and became John F. Kennedy 8) In the mean time, a group of indigenous Bulgarian, who were after stealing the identity of the Scandinavian king, Czar, historic Russian sharp shooter etc. had already taken over a ranch at Texas from the king; that mob paid to train a sharp shooter, "Oswald to impersonate the "historic" Russian sharp shooter of early 1900,s, who had saved Russia. 9) The Texas mob and takeover guy John F. Kennedy (who wanted to take over Kafka's home at Kings point/ Great Neck N.Y.) competed over the king's identity and assets. 10) When the Texas mob owed back taxes of over $600 million on oil (etc.), John F. Kennedy (the impersonator) may had blackmailed or wanted kickback from the Texas mob, who had the impersonating sharp shooter commit- while they themselves were in the Grassy knoll making sure it would be done. 11) Interesting to note that in the documentary film, the tall doctor in the emergency room (i.e., overseeing the shot John F. Kennedy, impersonator) was the original John Kennedy himself; he had become a Scandinavian passport approval guy and operated "Medical Arts" at then NY college (now Queens borough college), home of the "Soup Kitchen" operation during Cuban missile crisis! Somewhat complicated, this may be the true story! By K.L. OMG - SO, SO FUNNY!!!!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_34A This whole thing goes all the way back to 1954 with the above. I glanced at a book at the store recently (can't remember the name of it) where it mentioned the above and LBJ and McNamara signed off on the above I think it said Feb 64, six months prior to Tonkin. The Tonkin incident was just the "Remember the USS Maine" incident the warmongers were waiting for - that little big incident to get everyone foaming to start the war. You know, like Bush did when he said Sadaam had nuclear weapons. Coincidently, OP34A, starting in 1954, is around the same year where Oswald's Hungarian clone was found and thus, starting the Oswald and his clone operation. Could these two incidents just possibly be related? ¯_(ツ)_/¯

Who was on the WC from the CIA? McCone? One of his assistants? The answer should tell you a lot more than you think. How is it that the *former* CIA director served on the blue ribbon panel investigating his former bosses murder, the same guy who fired him two years before? Read the Perry testimony and how Dulles kept adding confusion to it. Far from being senile he knew what he was doing.

Yes, Jim - I do agree with you on the Oswald or Oswald look a like in that dance hall photo. Unfortunately, I posted that photo elsewhere on EF months ago and no one else seemed to agree that it looked like him. That's what I find maddening in this whole CT community - folks want to believe in everything - from this HL caper to all of the films being scooped up and altered, to Judy Baker and Bev Oliver to the body being whisked away by mad scientists before the official autopsy. But when you give them truly interesting and plausible info like the photo below or PM, then they don't WANT to believe that. Very, very strange how the CT human mind works. But I do see the resemblance and I'm sure LHO did know Ruby, too, in some way leading up to 11/22.

The 10k price for an appearance described by Vince is not for one of these appearances, but for an appearance... Right, Pat. Everyone needs to stay fed, clothed, and housed in today's age, even old Secret Service guys. And unfortunately, the general public soaks it all up to smiles and applause. It's just another speaking gig to them, like HC and many others. And also like Rob Ford after he murdered Jesse James. Thankfully, Hill doesn't clamber on top of a fake limo with a dummy showing the hole in the back (or side of its head), then jumps off bowing to applause.

I follow the evidence. I don't give a whit about the inclinations of the ignorati. Oh sure Sandy, sure. An incorrect "he was there, not here" and a "oh, look...look how this testimony says one thing and the other testimony says something completely different" and presto! you have a full-blown clone caper with unintentionally funny results. Yeah, Sandy, you're a real junior G-man with this "evidence." Bawwaaahaha!

What can you say? We live in a capitalistic society, where it's every man to himself.

So I guess meanwhile, while you think Parnell's article has no merit, you do believe in this outlandish story regarding Oswald, his clone, and two clones' Moms, one smiling and one with a unibrow? Isn't that like calling the kettle black?

So you're saying it's good but haven't quite taken the plunge and ordered it?