Charles Blackmon

The script supposedly fingers the Mob as being behind 11/22/63. Stars Pacino, Travolta, Courtney Love. Directed by David Mamet. Viggo Mortensen, Shia LaBeouf Board David Mamet's JFK Thriller - Variety Hollywood can read public sentiment about the need for a better explanation than the WC work of fiction.

I definitely don't believe it happened that way.

Thats not what he believes. Doesn't even make sense "LN lite".

For the benefit of us lurkers who aren't as well versed in the autopsy, is this the image of which you speak? It actually looks like a rendering of a photo by I. Dox.

Its velocity

Just a few hours later and this story on FOX disappears from the front page. Odd...

RFK Jr. doubles down on allegation CIA involved in JFK's assassination: '60-year cover-up' | Fox News

JFK turns his head sharply to look at something at the front entrance to the TSBD. Wonder what got his attention?

Not to derail your OP but what was the 1 out of 10 Z film alterations that you could not explain away?

And yet a mere couple minutes after taking that shot he is supposedly observed cool as a cucumber casually sipping a soft drink. As if he was some kind of veteran assassin.

How can anybody believe the Warren Commission version of events? Just incredible.

They couldn't.

Somebody would have talked.

This is a very spooky coincidence (I know, no coincidences in the JFKA) but I was living with my family in the U.P. of Michigan at the time. Just old enough to be told about and remember what happened on 11/22/63.

I really don't know who killed Tippit but if it was Larry Crafard there is a strong resemblance that could have confused witnesses. I don't like cherry-picking witness testimonies but at least one witness testimony would likely have been deemed worthless in a court of law. Unfortunately that witness seemed to be the WC "star" witness implicating Oswald in Tippit's murder. There is a discussion going on in this thread regarding shooting skills that the gunman possessed which Oswald likely did not.

The FBI could not identify the bullets retrieved from Tippit as being fired from the Oswald handgun to the exclusion of all other firearms.

David does that evidence explain how Oswald could be in one location shooting Tippit while at the same time he was seen in the Texas Theater? I have yet to see a timeline explaining this discrepancy.

I am having a hard time with "the camera barely moved" and another issue. Here is what I posted last night on the "Marina Oswald" thread: So Marina takes the first picture, hands the Reflex camera to Lee to advance the film, takes it back from Lee and shoots another picture. This would be 133a and 133b. When you compare these pics the backgrounds look pretty much the same. Kind of interesting that on a late March day that the records show a 12 mph wind, the vegetation looks identical.

Woo hoo! We can piggyback and have ANOTHER BYP discussion right here (why not?) So Marina takes the first picture, hands the Reflex camera to Lee to advance the film, takes it back from Lee and shoots another picture. This would be 133a and 133b. When you compare these pics the backgrounds look pretty much the same. Kind of interesting that on a late March day that the records show a 12 mph wind, the vegetation looks identical. Very interesting indeed!

I am admittedly going on memory but didn't you earlier say that you were unable to create a stereoscopic view of the background which would indicate that the backgrounds are basically the same? Wouldn't that indicate fakery?

A negative cannot be proven. Everybody knows this except apparently B.B.

@Chris Bristow133-a: his head going off in a different direction than the rest of the body. Have you studied this and found an explanation? What about Black Dog Nose in 133-b?

Here are a couple more BYP inconsistencies since the last one got no explanation. Oswald looks to be about the same size as the post holding the stairs, which has been described as 5'. Oswald is 5'-9". Did Oswald shrink while his head appeared to grow? What about the 'black dog nose' sticking out of the fence on 133b? Is this not the result of some kind of photo compositing process?

I appreciate Mr. Unger linking this video of the Zapruder head shot sequence. It has been awhile since I looked at it. I am wondering why, if the kill shot came from the rear, we don't see any "action" at the rear of JFK's head, only at the front/side of his head?

Has anybody seen any studies of 133-a that show that the head is outsized for the body? No question it looks too big, in addition to looking planted on top of the torso.