Charles Blackmon

I am not aware of people posting on this JFKA forum theories about a 9/11 conspiracy. Maybe somebody mentioned it somewhere but it doesn't seem to be out of hand. When somebody gets out of hand the best solution is to mute them. Then you can choose which of their posts you are willing to unmute and read. Its simple and I thank the mods for allowing that option.

Funny story, sure and Lord knows we need more humor. It does confirm though that you like to tell stories.

Cherry picking which witnesses to believe. Who woulda thought?

At least 42 people who either witnessed the assassination or had important information unknown to the general public died within 3 years of the assassination. The odds of that happening are around 1 in a trillion. The number of unexplained, often violent deaths accelerated as important witnesses were subpoened by the HSCA (George de Morenschildt and Jim Rosselli, among others). 103 witnesses had died by 1978.

Somebody at JFKA Discussion evidently thought I slandered them or sold their ideas short in this post. Then went outside to watch P. parade ( Parts 1 & 2 ) (jfkassassinationforum.com)

Interesting. Thanks for educating me on 'bots'.

At this writing there are 34 people worldwide including guests viewing this forum. Meanwhile at the JFKA Discussion website there are over 3000 viewers. Why would more of the masses be interested in reading constant nonsense from the likes of disinformation agent "Richard Smith" and "Brian Doyle" than from real JFK researchers like Pat Speer, Larry Hancock, David Josephs and Jim DiEugenio? Seems like some much needed P.R. is needed.

Wow you nail it with this one Steve. Good job as usual!

One of dozens upon dozens of important JFKA witnesses who died under very mysterious, unexplained circumstances.

The one on the far left is somebody else.

Welcome Scotty Moore!

Is Olsen a female friend of Tippit?

Good gosh I didn't think the tone would ever fall off the cliff this bad. Talk about driving away interest in the JFKA this is a good way to do it.

If it came to that (blowing up the explosive-laden car) I guess the perps really did not care that everyone would see that there was a conspiracy.

So the judge wants us to ignore the malfeasance displayed by law enforcement in the aftermath of the JFKA. Sure thing, Judge.

Yes. Following Germany's surrender, the scientists at the Los Alamos facility had a meeting to discuss their concerns about dropping the bomb on Japan, with Oppenheimer showing up. Is this factual? I don't know.

Would that have made the Trinity test scenes more powerful? I was a tad disappointed with that part of the film. Not trying to discourage anybody from seeing the film; I was glad I went.

"Every insight we have gained of him," he writes, "suggests the solitary nature of his act." None of that insight places LHO on the 6th floor at 12:30 CST.

Why was the DPD so hell-bent on blaming Oswald, including manufacturing evidence against him? Maybe there is already a lengthy post on this in the archives. I don't buy the excuse that it was because they thought he killed Officer Tipitt. Thats like believing Ruby did Oswald because he wanted to spare Jackie a trial.

The real point is, who would want to implicate Mac Wallace and why?

We also have the black blobs in both Zapruder and Muchmore films which obscure the blowout in the back of the head.

Agreed it looks like JC is starting to display pain about Z-236. Also believe he was hit again with a second slug.

Hard to tell; maybe if the images could be blown up some? What explains the differences in color between those two images?

Which film was that still with the black blob from? Muchmore?

Amen. I come from a military family (Navy, Air Force) but as a teenager the truth of the Vietnam debacle was coming out and I chose to go the civilian route in my career, although I did apply for Navy nuke program but did not make the cut.