Matt Allison Posted December 20, 2022 Share Posted December 20, 2022 22 minutes ago, W. Niederhut said: Do you doubt that Pompeo was involved in reviewing the classified CIA documents that Trump declined to de-classify in October of 2017 and April of 2018? Maybe he was. But does anyone really believe a JFK assassination plot was put down on paper and filed away? Despite there being no record of them ever doing that for any other "wet affair"? Of course not. So that means someone that knows the case backwards and forwards would have to be the one to have delineated such info from the extant files, and then make the accusation to TC. Mike Pompeo doesn't fit that profile. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 20, 2022 Share Posted December 20, 2022 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Lance Payette said: Edited December 20, 2022 by Lance Payette Deleted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James DiEugenio Posted December 20, 2022 Share Posted December 20, 2022 Tucker's source would not necessarily have to be in the CIA. That person could be retired from the CIA but was in on the collection process for the ARRB. Secondly, this person could know someone in the CIA who was in on that collection process. BTW, what was the Tunheim announcement today? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew Koch Posted December 20, 2022 Share Posted December 20, 2022 (edited) 1 hour ago, Lance Payette said: Apparently, no one was nonplussed by my two posts – quoting NPR, no less – to the effect that Fox’s successful defense in Tucker’s slander case was “You can’t take anything he says seriously. No reasonable person would. He makes stuff up.” No, I don’t believe he has a credible source for two rather obvious reasons: 1. This is Tucker Carlson. He makes stuff up. 2. Anyone who has seen all the documents would have to be a deep insider at the CIA. No such individual would take anything to Tucker Carlson or Fox News. The fact that Tucker is getting the publicity he’s getting on this forum, of all places, speaks volumes about the conspiracy community’s desperation to be taken seriously – does it not? @Kirk GallawayI finally found someone who agrees with your Tucker take, he also has about as good of arguements as you do.. meet @Lance Payette Meanwhile, for the people on the right side of the bell curve.. basically; Fox News requested the case be dismissed do to Tucker's show serving as opinion commentary and not News. https://thedispatch.com/article/fact-checking-a-claim-that-fox-news/ https://www.newsweek.com/tucker-carlson-wins-defamation-lawsuit-after-fox-news-argues-his-viewers-know-watch-his-show-some-1534357 Lance the second part of your #2 is like most of your arguments, which is called grasping at Straws. You need to make a News Years Resolution to not use Logical Fallacies when you craft an argument. The only person I've seen do it better than you is Vincent Bugliosi in his Reclaiming History monstrosity. The people here have clearly posted Tucker Carlson and his two segments out of surprise that someone with that large of an audience and is conservative would mention Jolly West and MKULTRA and than lean into the CIA and Mike Pompeo like he did, while reporting on the current release of the files. If you watch his show you know this kind of stuff which is why the left and neo con right like you spend so much trying to project, Qanon on the MAGA people. The other forum people who treat their politics like religion tried to warn the other members not to be seduced by Tucker Carlson's good looks and pro MAGA, nationalist, conservative, Christian, reactionary, fascist, racist, sexist, homophobic, white cis male gendered elitist ideas. (Sarcasm Added) The source is probably someone like Steven Miller who would have briefed the President, and would have a vested interest in throwing shade at Mike Pompeo. Edited December 20, 2022 by Matthew Koch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 20, 2022 Share Posted December 20, 2022 (edited) On 12/20/2022 at 4:12 PM, Matthew Koch said: @Kirk GallawayI finally found someone who agrees with your Tucker take, he also has about as good of arguements as you do.. meet @Lance Payette Meanwhile, for the people on the right side of the bell curve.. basically; Fox News requested the case be dismissed do to Tucker's show serving as opinion commentary and not News. https://thedispatch.com/article/fact-checking-a-claim-that-fox-news/ https://www.newsweek.com/tucker-carlson-wins-defamation-lawsuit-after-fox-news-argues-his-viewers-know-watch-his-show-some-1534357 Lance the second part of your #2 is like most of your arguments, which is called grasping at Straws. You need to make a News Years Resolution to not use Logical Fallacies when you craft an argument. The only person I've seen do it better than you is Vincent Bugliosi in his Reclaiming History monstrosity. The people here have clearly posted Tucker Carlson and his two segments out of surprise that someone with that large of an audience and is conservative would mention Jolly West and MKULTRA and than lean into the CIA and Mike Pompeo like he did, while reporting on the current release of the files. If you watch his show you know this kind of stuff which is why the left and neo con right like you spend so much trying to project, Qanon on the MAGA people. The other forum people who treat their politics like religion tried to warn the other members not to be seduced by Tucker Carlson's good looks and pro MAGA, nationalist, conservative, Christian, reactionary, fascist, racist, sexist, homophobic, white cis male gendered elitist ideas. (Sarcasm Added) The source is probably someone like Steven Miller who would have briefed the President, and would have a vested interest in throwing shade at Mike Pompeo. Hi Edited February 15, 2023 by Lance Payette Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew Koch Posted December 20, 2022 Share Posted December 20, 2022 6 minutes ago, Lance Payette said: What I linked to and quoted - twice - was an article from National Public Radio that itself quoted the trial judge. I assumed readers wouldn't want to see it a third time, but here you go. People can decide for themselves whether I mischaracterized it Lance you don't understand the difference between news and punditry? Here's a documentary you could use to educate yourself Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 21, 2022 Share Posted December 21, 2022 (edited) On 12/20/2022 at 4:41 PM, Matthew Koch said: Lance you don't understand the difference between news and punditry? Here's a documentary you could use to educate yourself Bye Edited February 15, 2023 by Lance Payette Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew Koch Posted December 21, 2022 Share Posted December 21, 2022 9 minutes ago, Lance Payette said: Give it a rest. You aren't going to win this one. BTW, my B.S. degree is in Journalism. The statements Carlson made were specific and factual, not punditry (and Fox didn't assert any "punditry" defense). The case was over the term extortion but just like the M$M we can't expect Lance to report accurately on the facts at least he made it one post with out saying the word UFO.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 21, 2022 Share Posted December 21, 2022 (edited) On 12/20/2022 at 5:40 PM, Matthew Koch said: The case was over the term extortion but just like the M$M we can't expect Lance to report accurately on the facts at least he made it one post with out saying the word UFO.. Bye Edited February 15, 2023 by Lance Payette Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew Koch Posted December 21, 2022 Share Posted December 21, 2022 48 minutes ago, Lance Payette said: Would the ACTUAL COURT OPINION satisfy you? Plaintiff claims that at least two statements in this segment are defamatory: (1) Mr. Carlson’s accusation that Ms. McDougal “approached Donald Trump and threatened to ruin his career and humiliate his family if he doesn’t give them money” and (2) Mr. Carlson’s suggestion that Ms. McDougal actions were “a classic case of extortion,” which is a crime. Am. Compl. ¶¶ 13-20. Plaintiff submits that Mr. Carlson’s statements were facts, as indicated by his statement: “Remember the facts of the story. These are undisputed.” See Episode Transcript; Am. Compl. ¶¶ 10, 12, 16, 34. https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/new-york/nysdce/1:2019cv11161/527808/39/ Please, feel free to keep embarrassing yourself, but I'm done with you. The presstitute is done with me, lol. I'm not a Neo con statist like you are so what the judge says isn't gospel and doesn't really matter given what was argued on court. Thant's two post without mentioning UFO's I'm proud of you Lance.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
W. Niederhut Posted December 21, 2022 Share Posted December 21, 2022 2 hours ago, Lance Payette said: No, it was Fox's lawyers and the trial judge who said Tucker makes things up and can't be taken seriously. I'm just the messenger. Lots of people of a conservative ilk speak to and appear on Fox News. I don't believe someone desiring credibility and taking a potentially very serious legal risk would choose to confide in Tucker Carlson. Do I believe Pompeo was involved in the review? Obviously. I have enough confidence in his integrity that I don't believe those documents included any JFKA Bombshell or that he would confide in Tucker if they did. For that matter, if they had included a JFKA Bombshell, I'm pretty confident The Donald would've told 200 people before the day was over. That's a lot of ifs, Lance, considering your original assertion that Tucker Carlson is making up the story about his alleged CIA source. Among other things, you're over generalizing-- assuming that everything Carlson says is fictitious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron Bulman Posted December 21, 2022 Share Posted December 21, 2022 5 hours ago, W. Niederhut said: That's a lot of ifs, Lance, considering your original assertion that Tucker Carlson is making up the story about his alleged CIA source. Among other things, you're over generalizing-- assuming that everything Carlson says is fictitious. If, if, if. If if's and but's were candies and nut's we'd all have a Merry Christmas. Dandy Don. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew Koch Posted December 21, 2022 Share Posted December 21, 2022 Lee Camp does a segment on the Media admitting CIA Killed JFK for the first time. https://rumble.com/v21gd7g-media-admits-cia-killed-jfk-for-first-time.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
W. Niederhut Posted April 27 Share Posted April 27 (edited) On 12/16/2022 at 10:37 AM, W. Niederhut said: Any votes for Mike Pompeo being Tucker Carlson's inside source about the CIA documents? Pompeo was, obviously, in the loop, as CIA Director, when Trump "got rolled by the Deep State" in October of 2017. As for Tucker Carlson, I salute him for his outstanding take down of the CIA last night. I have always despised the guy, but I truly respect him today for finally telling the American public the truth about the CIA's role in JFK's assassination. It's bound to embarrass Joe Biden, and it should. I'm deeply disappointed with Biden for copping out on releasing the documents. Hey, do I get any Education Forum Brownie points for voting for Mike Pompeo as Tucker Carlson's secret JFKA/CIA source, on December 16, 2022? 🤥 And, if so, can I use my EF Brownie points to restore the Rafael Cruz/JFKA/National Enquirer thread to the board? I was interested in Robert Morrow's inside stories about his work with Roger Stone, including Stone's flawed editing of Robert's contributions to the LBJ Did It manuscript-- certainly relevant to the JFK assassination. And how often do we get to read inside stories about JFKA books, in which the final edition of a book is compared to hyena excrement? Edited April 27 by W. Niederhut Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Douglas Caddy Posted April 28 Share Posted April 28 Jefferson Morley's column today https://open.substack.com/pub/jfkfacts/p/amazing-conversation-tucker-carlson?r=5pqyc&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now