Ron Ecker

Well, of course they're not afraid to report the government's version of the case, which they've done over and over. What they're deathly afraid of is to report the truth, even if that means nothing more than a second gunman at least. But no, it was that little Commie rat Oswald, alone. How many times do they have to tell us?

There's nothing old worth reporting? How often has the old stuff been reported? It's old stuff here, but what does that mean out there? How much is new about the stuff the series has covered for four seasons? Is there something new about the Titanic? Oh, but which is more important to this country, the Titanic or Dallas?

I see that CNN is running an original HLN documentary series on “How It Really Happened,” covering some of the most notorious crimes and mysteries of our time. Now why do you suppose this series could go on for four seasons without even touching on how the JFK assassination, arguably the most notorious crime of the 20th century, really happened? That should have been the first episode of Season 1, don’t you think? They should at least include an episode explaining why the JFK assassination is not included in "How It Really Happened." The episode could be titled, "Do You Think We're Crazy?" https://www.cnn.com/shows/how-it-really-happened

I thought that God quit talking directly to people after Old Testament times. But apparently he's still at it. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/woman-says-god-told-her-eclipse-shooting-spree-police_n_66147707e4b0743395c2f12d

Believe me, I'm not taking sides, I just want to point out a fact. That photo of Rita Palma standing beside Looney Bird Powell means nothing because we don't know if it's real or not. With photoshopping and AI today we can't know if anything's real. And just wait till tomorrow! For all we know, even the Zapruder film, going all the way back to 1963, was tampered with. (There's been a rumor to that effect.)

I kept thinking all day today about that line spoken by a hen-pecked husband in A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum: "Never fall in love during a total eclipse."

Not according to any poll that I've seen. They're running neck and neck. And now with RFK Jr., the black professor (is that what he is?) whose name escapes me, and the Stein woman (what does she do besides run for president?) determined to take votes away, I don't see much basis for optimism. Everyone knows what Trump is and too many people don't care. In fact, two or three more Trump indictments or even just one conviction and Biden might as well concede.

Try to look at it philosophically. In a free and fair election, people get what they deserve in those whom they elect. If this country wants a dictator (and it certainly acts like it does), it will get one. A lot of people won't like it, but the majority (or rather the Electoral College) rules. That's how our democracy works, while it lasts. And, to paraphrase Sandy, it was good while it lasted. When you're as old as I am, you can be more philosophical, knowing that you won't have to live through what's coming. (I look at climate change the same way.) I at least have the comfort of knowing that I lived in the best of times.

I'll buy that. I just wish someone, anyone, in the mainstream would say it. Maybe I've missed it. I'll say this anyway. Netanyahu is really a nice guy.

Yeah, I remember the phrase "conquest of the MIddle East." Syria was to be the first country taken. Somehow things just didn't pan out. Or things didn't go Syriaously. Now I guess Israel attacking the Iranian embassy in Syria is (to paraphrase the PNAC) Iran's "Pearl Harbor." Looking at the bright side, I guess it's best to go to war with Iran before it has nuclear weapons. Wait, maybe therein lies the "who benefits."

I found the statement I’m think of in a Web search. It was in a meeting with Bin Laden supporters and was videotaped. But unless I’m mistaken, this is the videotape that was “found” by the US with a guy portraying Bin Laden who was about a hundred pounds too heavy. I knew this was faked, but my recollection was that the statement in question came from some other source. My bad. (Bad memory, that is.) This is from the transcript: UBL: (...Inaudible...) we calculated in advance the number of casualties from the enemy, who would be killed based on the position of the tower. We calculated that the floors that would be hit would be three or four floors. I was the most optimistic of them all. (...Inaudible...) due to my experience in this field, I was thinking that the fire from the gas in the plane would melt the iron structure of the building and collapse the area where the plane hit and all the floors above it only. This is all that we had hoped for. http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Dec2001/d20011213ubl.pdf

Israel bombs Iran’s embassy in Syria, killing several Iranian commanders. Well guess what. When commanders are killed, they are simply replaced. So what was accomplished? Who benefited from Israel inviting absolutely certain Iranian retaliation, against both Israel and US interests, since Iran of course holds us partly to blame? In all the news coverage about this bombing and the anticipated retaliation, I haven’t heard one comment about why Israel did it, just when the US government is reportedly worried about a wider war in the Middle East, with the US of course sucked into it. Does anyone have a theory?

I think RFK Jr. as a kid was given some kind of bad vaccine. We're having to live with the result.

I recall a reported remark by Bin Laden some tme after 9/11 in which he expressed surprise at how the Twin Towers fell, that he only expected damage to the buildings. Do you recall that statement? Do you know its source? Was it a legitimate report by some news agency, a U.S. fabrication, or what?

When you had the CIA ("betrayed" by JFK at the Bay of Pigs plus the firing of Dulles), the JCS ("Vietnam, here we come!"), LBJ (a Get Out of Jail Free card as POTUS), and the FBI (J. Edgar would be rid of his boss Bobby), what more did you need? The Mafia, anti-Castro Cubans, some Dallas cops, some SS agents and various other JFK haters would be glad to lend helping hands as may be needed. We know for a fact that the mainstream media would be no problem at all, though I do have to wonder how much the media's disgraceful conduct could have been foreseen.