Micah Mileto

Within the first 3 pages he starts talking about Police evidence numbers. It wastes no time!

Crenshaw was included in a 11/22/1983 piece in the Philadelphia Daily News, titled Where Are They Now? by Debbie M. Price (Link): A few hours before the motorcade began, Dr. Charles Baxter and Dr. Charles Crenshaw, had joked that the only way they’d be able to see the president was if he came to the back door of Parkland Memorial Hospital. “It was very ironic. Very tragic,” recalled Crenshaw, now 50 and head of the surgical department at John Peter Smith Hospital in Fort Worth. “Because that is exactly what he did.” Crenshaw, then a second-year resident, and Baxter, then the physician in charge of the emergency room, were among the dozen doctors who rushed to Trauma Room One as the motorcade sped for Parkland. The teaching hospital even then was a pioneer in emergency room technique, and the doctors threw themselves automatically into their “fire drill” – removing Kennedy’s clothes, shoes and back brace, inserting intravenous tubes into both arms and legs, a chest catheter and a trachea tube, performing heart massage and giving O-negative blood. “Even though you know what you're going to see, it’s still shocking to see the president lying there with his head shot off,” said Baxter, now 53 and chief of the Parkland Regional Burn Center and head of the hospital’s chemical organ transplant bank. The right side of Kennedy’s skull and brain were gone, a certain indication that he had been killed instantly, although there was a faint pulse when he arrived at Parkland, the doctors said. “It was a mortal wound,” Crenshaw said, “Maybe the treatment was overkill, but I think it would have been heinous to sit back and say, ‘OK, he’s dead.’ We would have done the same procedure for any patient.” Crenshaw remembers Kennedy as a huge man who filled the entire gurney. He says he still can see the flowers Mrs. Kennedy was carrying, spattered with blood and brain matter, lying in a disposal pail under the cart. Secret Service agents, some of them with their guns cocked, swarmed around the doctors. “All I thought about at the time was doing the procedures. The gravity of the matter didn’t hit us until it was all over,” Crenshaw said. “Mrs. Kennedy came in and put her ring on his finger. It was very touching.” Two days later Crenshaw would operate on Oswald.

Buried in Plain Sight by John Hunt is also an excellent RFK book. Totally worth the Kindle price.

Is this the only time this quote has been uttered on this forum? Where does this quote come from?

We already know from basic geometry that the HSCA's interpretation of the empty-cranium photographs cannot be true - the entry and exit in the bone could not only be 5 inches apart, because you cannot pull a brain out of a 5-inch skull cavity - the HSCA's interpretation could only be true if pieces of the rear parts of the skull were somehow replaced after having already been taken out.

I am still interested in your theory that the wooden fence, beside the storm drain on the grassy knoll, was rebuilt on the day of the assassination to make the drain be behind the fence rather than in front. Aren't there any better photographs of that area from the time? Shouldn't there be very many clear photos showing the fence?

The autopsy photos have a comically bad chain of custody. That would be true even if the photos were genuine.

Is it just my own biases, or is the age of BOH-wound broke? Or course, that doesn't necessarily mean the end of criticism of the medical evidence - on the contrary, I'm currently creeping up on 600 pages for a project on wounds that aren't the large head wound. And besides those issues, I've previously talked about the chest tubes, the witness evidence for neck organs being removed at the autopsy, and the feigned ignorance of the throat wound during the autopsy. Maybe the temple wounds and torso wounds are the new "woke". So maybe those issues cannot be proven scientifically - the lack of decent explanation for the witness evidence is enough to make a probably-permanent stain on history. There's already a lot of witness evidence on extra weapons, bullet holes, shells, slugs, and other evidence at the scene which does not fit the official story.

Are we sure now that the "air pocket" isn't an artifact like the HSCA said?

After Kennedy is done waving his hand in the late z170's, his body language in the film becomes ambiguous. There was about 2.3 seconds between that z180 and z222.

@David Von Pein

Do you have any thoughts on the physical possibility of a separate Oswald shot to Connally? It seems to me like with such a theory, the government's biggest problem would just be explaining why nobody reported finding a round in the limo if it barely dropped out of Kennedy's throat/back... unless one wanted to argue that it somehow got lost on the street.

https://youtu.be/GkQyYgr_aqY?feature=shared&t=81 With the Knott laboratories model looking as if Connally's shoulder could've been available to be shot from the Sixth Floor at Zapruder frame 225, what would prevent the government from just coming out with a new theory that Oswald shot JFK at about z180 with a 6.5 round, modified to have less charge and barely exiting the throat, followed about 2.3 seconds later by another round shot into Connally at around z224? Would it be possible to physically disprove this theory? They could even try theorizing that the witnesses mistook the first two shots as a single shot because of how the first one was undercharged, and that the next two shots described by the witnesses were actually a single shot followed by the skull exploding.

I have already posted the most important statements from McClelland on the left temple wound. His final version of the story (post 1980s) is that there was a spot of blood on the left temple that looked like a wound. I have decided to combine my two-years-late "Case for an Altered Throat Wound" with the temple wound information, under the basic theme of information suggesting the coercion of Parkland witnesses

There is no such thing as unbiased, there is only a question of which side you are biased against, and for what reasons.

With all due respect, what is your extraordinary evidence for the extraordinary claim that mental healthcare workers know more about the human mind than the average person? The human mind is one of the most extraordinary phenomena in the universe that "we" know of, so it must follow that somebody claiming to understand the human mind better than most will need to provide some very extraordinary evidence to corroborate them. Virtually all of what modern mental healthcare claims to be science is just witness evidence. Witness evidence is notoriously unreliable. On it's face, it is obvious how psychology is just another cult, albiet one that has convinced virtually every government in the world of it's importance. Those papers are just pretentious and circular - not worth the paper they are (sometimes) printed on. Just try reading a random new paper from a mainstream psychology journal, and notice how any truly skeptical reader will understand how truly stupid and hollow the research is. This is the circus that decides prison sentences and executions.

Professional Psychology is equally as stupid as armchair psychology. You shouldn't listen to anything these "professionals" claim. Weren't they doing labotomies then?

Did the Warren report expressly tell the reader that the curb mark could not have been made by a direct hit because a direct hit would've taken out too much concrete? Also, the report acknowledges a possibility that the curb mark could've been made by one of the shots that wounded the torsos of Kennedy and Connally - strange that the Warren report feigned ignorance of the official story's need for the SBT (Specter would reportedly later admit to Josiah Thompson that he always thought the SBT was necessary). Again, I have always wondered that if the day comes the SBT is scientifically disproven, the government will just try making a cover story for the masses about Oswald tampering with his ammunition to make one low-velocity 6.5 slug enter Kennedy's back and barely exit the throat, perhaps at Zapruder frame 180, then perhaps followed by a separate Oswald shot into Connally's torso at z223 (2.38888888889 seconds at 18 frames per second).

It would seem that McClelland or another doctor said out loud during the ordeal "a piece of cerebellum just fell onto the cart".

Isn't the red blob on the Zapruder film meant to be the inner surface of the skull flap, not brains?

Mormons are more likely to be hired by the FBI. Officially, this is because Mormons are less likely to have a problematic legal record, but perhaps the real reason is that they have genocide in their hearts.

Where in the FBI report did it give any specific detail indicating that Akin was capable of fabricating information? That report is high on opinion but low on detail.

Wow, just wow. Evidence, please. I don't care what the Mormon Nazis at the FBI think, I want specific information indicating that Akin could've been capable of fabricating information or being delusional, and no such information was provided in that report. If he saw a left temple wound, he could've told others about it pre-1981.

Is this Akin? Did he die in 1986 at the age of 56 shortly after telling the FBI about the forehead wound? https://www.myheritage.com/names/gene_akin

6/28/84 FBI Memorandum, SA Udo H. Specht to SAC, Dallas, re: interviews with Akin (RIF#124-10158-10449)---”On 6/18/84, the writer and SA DOUG DAVIS interviewed an individual who stated he was formerly Dr. GENE COLEMAN AKIN, the senior resident anesthesiologist at Parkland Hospital, Dallas, Texas. AKIN stated that he was on duty at the hospital on 11/22/63 when President KENNEDY was brought in the emergency room. AKIN stated that the FBI interviewed him during the 1963-1964 period concerning any of the observations he made on 11/22/63. AKIN stated that the “historic accident” of being present in the emergency room on 11/22/63 changed his whole life in a negative way. He feels that the governments on both a federal and state level have harassed him since that time. He stated that he quit practicing medicine in 1979 or 1980 and that DEA took his narcotics license away. He has never recouped the money it cost him to practice medicine because of government interference with his own destiny and self-initiative. He has been on welfare since 1980 and feels it is now the government’s obligation to take care of him. He claims that his sister had him committed to Terrell State Hospital and he was incarcerated in that institution from March 9 through May 25, 1984. He stated that it took him that long to convince the doctors that he was not a “nut.” AKIN is in the hospital for heart by-pass surgery on 6/20/84 and he has also been diagnosed as having renal cancer. AKIN also stated that he had his name changed to SOLOMON BEN ISRAEL and he was interviewed in Room 439, St. PAUL’s HOSPITAL, Dallas, Texas. AKIN ranted and raved about government injustice and conspiracies against him and behaved in a general aberrant manner. His mannerism in communicating, in the opinion of the writer, gave him or the information he was trying to relate no credibility whatsoever. The writer attempted to listen to him for over one hour. AKIN made efforts to contact the Dallas news media in order to tell his story, but apparently received very little favorable response. The writer made efforts to get AKIN to tell his story. AKIN kept ranting and raving about items from the right to the left of the political spectrum. AKIN did finally say that when he saw President KENNEDY in the emergency room on 11/22/63, he thought he saw a bullet entrance wound on the President’s forehead. The President was covered with blood in the head area and the back of his head was blown wide open. AKIN feels that his observation as to the possible entrance wound on the President’s forehead is significant and that he did not mention this item when he was interviewed in 1963-1964 because he did not want to be killed by any conspirators. AKIN stated that if this entrance wound was not documented in the Presidential autopsy, then plastic surgery was probably conducted to cover this up. AKIN made available a cassette tape recording of items he recorded himself during the past few days. The tape recording was reviewed by the writer and contained no information whatsoever concerning AKIN’s comments about the assassination of President KENNEDY. [redaction: at least one paragraph] At 1:45 pm, 6/28/84, AKIN telephonically contacted the writer and stated that he checked himself out [of] St. Paul’s hospital to [be] re-evaluated as to what to do about his medical condition. He stated that he was calling from the Dallas County Jail and that he had been arrested on 6/26/84. He was unspecific as to why he was arrested, but he indicated that it was some type of fraud charge and alcohol might have been an issue also. He wanted the writer to get him out of Jail and that it was all the FBI’s fault that his troubles are continuing. AKIN became extremely verbally abusive and the writer terminated the call. [redaction: at least a few sentences; end]” Where does it say any specific thing against his credibility? Sounds like the FBI, like most dirty rotten humans, will just call anything they don't agree with a mental illness. Also, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ovCdMKfthXw