Benjamin Cole

My understanding is the Harvey files are now dead to the public, thanks to the Biden snuff job on the JFK Records Act. Someone has a grip on the Biden Administration. But who?

Check your headline. Interesting question.

I did a Google search for fresh news stories related to the Biden Administration snuff job on the JFK Records Act, since we are observing the 60th anniversary if the JFKA. Not much out there. A couple smaller outlets quote RFK2, but I do nor dare post as I may get banned again. The Miami Herald has always had a relatively skeptical view of the official narrative JFKA, possibly as they had sources near or in the Miami Station of CIA, and the Miami exile community, and they ran this today: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/national/article282163648.html Sadly, even The Miami Herald cites the Warren Commission, and it conclusions, without citing the HSCA, and its differing conclusions in this article. The article lamely concludes that even if all the records are released, people would still believe in a conspiracy. Nowhere in the article is there the sense of outrage one should expect from "journalists" that public records that belong to the public, and that are by law supposed to be in the public's hands, are being withheld by the Biden Administration. The article is further limited as it does not ask the question" Why? Why? Why is the Biden Administration withholding the JFK Records, if there was no conspiracy?" People say money runs US politicians (not just Biden, all major office holders). It takes millions just to run for a Congressional seat. Maybe a billion for the Presidency. But somehow, I don't think it is money this time. It does not seem like it is to curry favor with large party donors that Biden has done his snuff job on the JFK Records. So why? Why? The question The Miami Herald did not ask.

Perhaps. That does not explain this: At the time LIFE went to press, it was thought JFK had been shot in the throat. But Oswald was behind JFK, in the TSBD. So, LIFE solves the problem and reports, "The 8mm [Zapruder] film shows the President turning his body far around to the right as he waves to someone in the crowd. His throat is exposed to the sniper's nest [in the TSBD] just before he clutches it." This is truly creative lying, showing a scope and scale for deception and disinformation that must have impressed envious peers in Moscow and Peking. Now explain to me when, in the Z-film, you see JFK turn and face the TSBD. Was LIFE trying to make profits with that fabricated reporting? This LIFE reporting does color perceptions of what happened to the Z-film. In truth, it was not shown to the bulk of the American public for years and years. I suspect this was because many observers, rightly or wrongly, would see JFK suddenly thrust to his own back and left as evidence of a shot from the right and front---from the GK in other words. This thrust of JFK (seen in the Z film) coincides with the witness testimony of the sound of shots and gunsmoke at the GK. Let us say, I am skeptical the Z-film was repressed for pecuniary considerations only. (As an aside, I suspect the GK was a "smoke and bang show," a diversion. But I cannot explain why JFK was thrust to own back and right so violently.)

There seems to have been high panic regarding the official narrative, in the immediate aftermath of the JFKA. As well-documented, the CIA turned US media into its megaphone on the JFK assassination, abject in all regards. In anyone doubts the craven complicity of trusted titans of US media at the time, let them consider this paragraph from Life magazine, which ran in Life's December 6, 1963 issue. At the time Life went to press, it was thought JFK had been shot in the throat. But Oswald was behind JFK, in the TSBD. So, Life solves the problem and reports, "The 8mm [Zapruder] film shows the President turning his body far around to the right as he waves to someone in the crowd. His throat is exposed to the sniper's nest [in the TSBD] just before he clutches it." This is truly creative lying, showing a scope and scale for deception and disinformation that must have impressed envious peers in Moscow and Peking. It is hard to conceive of a lower moment for US journalism.

Interesting. Of course silencers are a possibility to muffle sounds. Also, snubnose .38's are known for their loud report, despite firing a subsonic bullet, due to the minimal barrel length. An exotic possibility is a pneumatic weapon.

The Pugibet datebook confirms all!

Do you mean this: https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB4/ciaguat2.html

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/16/movies/jfk-what-the-doctors-saw-review.html A brief, noncommittal review of the JFK: What the Doctors Saw show streaming on Paramount. I guess this counts as progress.

PS- Why would military men use "subsonic" ammo? (<1128 fps).

RO- I have read Salandria, and admire his thinking, and I am well aware of the historical context regarding the JFKA. That is far from proof that Allen Dulles (himself a mere cat's paw for globalists) organized the JFKA. Others suspect Angleton, and now the name Bruce Solie is surfacing. We have also whack-a-doodle theories involving Pugibet and datebook and Hitler-as-Trump. But back to history--- Ponder this event: "Gunfire erupted on the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives on March 1, 1954, when four Puerto Rican nationalists shot at random from the spectators' galleries, shouting “Viva Puerto Rico libre!”—“Long live free Puerto Rico!” Five members of Congress were injured, one seriously." ---30--- The perps of the 1954 shooting were not that concerned with escaping, and more concerned with making a point. The JFKA perps may have been more concerned with revenge (incorrectly perceiving the BoP) than much else. I took a stab at explaining the JFKA above, all IMHO. If I had to guess, the RFK murder resulted from a conspiracy (though how Thane Eugene Cesar fired without being seen is a puzzle), and MLK too. That is a long way from proving who was behind those murders, and if they were connected in terms of perps. Potshots were taken at President Ford too, after all. BTW, whether or not the globalists-Deep State murdered JFKA, that element has grown 100-fold in the last 60 years. The huge globalist commercial enterprises of today--Apple, Disney, Walmart, Goldman Sachs, BlackRock, GM, Morgan Stanley, Microsoft--dwarf the old globalists, who were primarily involved in agriculture or resource extraction. The new globalists have combined with the Deep State, one with 100 times the surveillance and intel tools that existed in 1964. The new globalists do not need to assassinate anybody. They run the show, and can ruin anyone, and made the idea of non-interventionist nationalism a dirty word (while globalism is 100 times more imperialistic and warmongering than modern nationalism). Biden is the latest puppet-dictator-in-chief to ascend the throne, and he has done a snuff job on the JFK Records Act. Connect the dots as you wish.

Excellent questions. Yes, IMHO someone fired a shot at Walker, or where he had a chair, and the slug struck a window pane, was deflected lower, and then passed through the wall behind Walker's chair (in your take, likely an empty chair). So how did a steel-jacketed bullet, described by someone in the Dallas Police Department as a 30.06, and attested to in two different DPD reports as steel-jacketed, come to rest exactly in between large bundled literature? One guess (consistent with your staged event theory) is that LHO fired at the empty Walker chair, but with the assurance that a fake slug would be placed at the scene, so that the slug would not be traced back to his rifle, in the event he became a suspect later. Perhaps LHO used the M-C rifle. That's a guess. If you read the FBI report on how the bullet was found...fishy. I have a different explanation than you on the Walker shooting, but I believe in throwing all the evidence out there and see what comes of it.

Paul B- That's right. It sure looked like an attempt to smear Noguchi as a nut, as his work on the autopsy itself was above reproach. You gotta love Wikipedia, which has become PC/Deep State. "Robert Kennedy assassination and resignation[edit] Noguchi's autopsy of Robert Kennedy concluded that the fatal shot was fired into the back of Kennedy's head, behind the right ear, from an upward angle, and from a distance of no more than 0.5 to 3 inches (15–75 mm) away. Such a finding has given rise to conspiracy theories regarding the assassination, as no witnesses reported seeing the convicted assassin, Sirhan Sirhan, any closer to Kennedy than 1 meter away and in a position to fire such a shot. Noguchi himself points out in his memoir Coroner that he has never officially ruled that Sirhan fired the fatal shot.[4] Shortly after the Kennedy shooting, Noguchi came under scrutiny and resigned under pressure as Chief Medical Examiner after Deputy Los Angeles County Counsel Martin Weekes testified that he had seen a smiling Noguchi dancing in his office and that Noguchi had announced to associates "I am going to be famous. I hope he dies".[5] A secretary in the coroner's office also testified she had heard Noguchi say he wanted to perform a vivisection on Lin Hollinger, the county's chief administrative officer with whom he had argued over budget matters ---30-- Yes, I have a "conspiracy theory" because RFK was shot from behind and Sirhan was in front of RFK.

LS- Who is not a suspect in the JFKA? Yes, I think Nixon was referring to the JFKA when he said that "whole Bay of Pigs thing." So did Haldeman. So suspects Jeff Morley. You have to remember, people living in the same neighborhood, or checking into the same hotel, or having one meeting, does not mean they assassinated Kennedy, or assisted thereof. My best guess is CIA Miami Station, a small number of mercs and Cuban exiles, and the patsy LHO. I cannot prove my case.

Thanks for the answer, PJ. Given that (AFAIK) none of even the military autopsists challenged the Noguchi-RFK autopsy, then it appears that the findings of Noguchi stand. Interesting.

The is a strong article you cite, and the article itself cites by authentic sources that can be checked. According to the Kirkus review of the book, The Marseille Connection--- "However, his (author McCallion) questionable evidence for this assertion (Weiller as drug kingpin) is largely limited to a 1968 meeting in which Weiller agreed to contribute $2 million to Nixon’s campaign. Overall, the book does raise intriguing possibilities. However, it offers conjecture rather than a resolution of “The Major Unsolved Crime of the 20th Century.” In the end, it largely fails to support its theory that mobsters had an “unholy alliance” with the Nixon administration and the CIA. ---30--- From more reputable sources, it appears Nixon was "mobbed up" from back to his Southern California days. Chuck Colson famously said "the mob got its hooks into Nixon" back then. I wonder if the $2 million Weiller campaign donation (a lot of dough back in the those days) ever materialized. As much as I regard Nixon as lacking scruples, a mere meeting is not proof of guilt or affiliation in this or any other circumstance. This is the old "guilt by association" tired saw, in which any two people ever photographed together, or having had a single meeting, are said to serious allies and confederates. Politicians, by the nature of their office, meet thousands and thousands of people every year. Nixon, or JFK, or LBJ, or Clinton, or Trump. Given the ever-widening circle of JFKA suspects and allies you have suggested, you might be better off with a shorter list of people you do not suspect in the JFKA. I was eight years old and living in Southern California at the time.

I was unaware that Thomas Noguchi flew in autopsists from various US military branches to witness his autopsy. As many JFKA researchers know, according to the RFK autopsy, the bullets that struck RFK appear to have come from behind and at close range, while Sirhan was in front of RFK by six feet or so and fired at RFK while facing the candidate, according to eyewitnesses. Is RFK2 correct, that the Noguchi autopsy was performed in front of other autopsists?

Best of success to you on your presentation. The mushroom bullet was found in between bundles of paper, per FBI report. One bundle of paper was lifted up, and the mushroom bullet was there. resting atop another bundle. There is no report of tunneling. If you think the Walker shooting was staged, this is suggestive evidence.

This is remarkable! From the Pugibet datebook, Nov. 20: "Je suis situé à Stone. hôtel" This Pugibet entry appears to verify the Lafitte datebook.

Do you address the manner in which the mushroom shaped Walker bullet was found?

The Pugibet datebook is of equal authenticity to the Lafitte datebook. Are not you putting on airs?

From my copy of a selected page of the Pugibet datebook: "Ma conscience me hante. Avant de mourir, je l'avouerai."

I am preparing a gentle and kind review...but Reiner is out of his element. And seems to be buddy-buddy with CIA'ers now, by his own statement. Oliver Stone was advised in depth by DiEugenio. It shows. Reiner seems to have decided to rely on his own instincts and contacts.

There is even another bullet reported by a doctor at Bethesda. The Young bullet is the most convincing. The pointy head bullet sure is a mystery. Fired at JFK? And ended up on the floor in Parkland? How? Many have said part of spycraft is to plant and spread simply unfathomable stories and false leads etc. I am convinced, based on the reactions of Gov. Connally, that a long gunman armed with a single-shot bolt action rifle could not have fired all the shots that day. Then we have the smoke-and-bang show at the GK. Dr. Shaw, Connally's surgeon, thought it likely he was shot through the wrist by a separate missile. So it goes....

That's amazing! The same thing happened to me! I do not own the Puginet datebook, and I have signed an NDA that prevents anyone from authenticating the document. But!---I have been allowed to see key passages in the datebook that confirm its authenticity beyond all doubt. We are in the same boat! Exactly the same boat!