Marjan Rynkiewicz

I see 2 mistakes. U cant say .... when they said.... koz, Adams & Styles did not agree. Styles said that they did not leave the window at an early time. And, Styles said that they firstly went to the elevator, & then went to the stairs. Nextly, u are wrong re your reference to S&L. There is no such wording (by Adams)(by anyone) in the recording. Adams did mention 2 gentlemen outside the building, not inside.

Yes, i have MORTAL ERROR & JFK THE SMOKING GUN, & yes, Fisher told Donahue that the inshoot was higher up (higher than where Olivier fired his 10 test inshoots). I havent tried to follow all of the contradictions. And i havent tried to understand the xrays, but it surprises me that the back of the head entry (or exit) hole is not clear re pozzie in xrays. Surely the xrays should settle that exact (pozzie) issue, re height & re off-center (or are the xrays really that poor?). Exhumation would tell us. An mri scan of the whole casket would tell us i think. If an mri scan showed a hole above the lambda then what would that do to most of your stuff?

Hi Pat, i love your stuff. I daresay that no-one was lying, just wrong. For example Hume says that re his autopsy report he expected the xrays & photos to speak for themselves. But as u know Hume hizself did not have access to the xrays nor photos after leaving Bethesda. Yes, all ovem were wrong when describing a large hole at the back of the head. The driver of the johnsonlimo helped to get jfk out of the jfklimo, & the driver said that he never saw the hole (here i mean a big blowout hole)(not the small bullet hole), koz he only ever got to see the back of the head. All it needs is a good BS meter, & it appears that i have the best BS meter around here.

I repeat ........Hodges did say that the EOP site had been described as being the entry..... These words exist & can never be erased (but apparently have been been ignored, but not by me). Anyone with a good BS meter can see that any claim that the entry was other than above the lambda is wrong.

What are the chances that next Friday i get out of bed at 8am & turn my computer on & then at 8:05am i find that i cant move my right hand & then at 8:10am find that i cant talk & then at 8:45am find myself in Emergency surrounded by doctors. Virtually nil. But that is what happened last Friday.

Michael i appreciate your commitment to the jfk saga. But, i have never corrected u on one little point that i have seen u make umpteen times on this & other forums. So i will correct it now. Donahue did not say that the existence of many small fragments inside the head near the front of the head support a shot-from-the-front (u love the shot-from-the-front theory). No, Donahue said that the small fragments near the front support a shot-from-the-back. See top of p228 paperback. See bottom of p247 paperback.

https://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/27985-hickey-might-have-fired-his-ar15-members-survey/page/13/#comment-515142 Read my comments/postings on this forum (link above to one ovem). And on the jfkassassinationforum. I am No1 in the world on the jfk accidental homicide. Then, if one atom of any of what i have said (written) is wrong, get back to me. I of course have MORTAL ERROR & of course JFK THE SMOKING GUN. Wonderful works. But it appears that i am the only one in the world who ever realized that Hickey fired an auto burst (not just one shot). I am the only only one who realized that Bronson proves it (not disproves it). All else supporting Hickey-did-it on the web is of little value, just a repeat of mortal error at best. Before i joined this forum i visited every thread on this forum (876 pages today i see). Took me weeks. All u have to do is read my say 333 postings (easy). I will wait.

Hodges did not say that the EOP site was the entry. He merely said that the EOP site had been described as being the entry.

Bronson shows McIntyre looking at Hickey (shooting) up to Z313, after which McIntyre quickly looks towards jfk to see if any damage has been done. So, Bronson proves that McIntyre was lieing when he said that he saw jfk's head blow up. We cant see Landis in Bronson koz Landis is behind McIntyre. Praps Landis did see jfk's head blow up. The question where was the wound is not a good question. 1stly, it tells Landis that there was only one wound (ie by saying THE wound). 2ndly, we know that there was more than one wound (ie the small inshoot at back of head is a wound). I wonder whether Landis got to see the big hole when helping with jfk at Parkland? Or praps Landis might mention 2 big holes (in addition to at least one small inshoot). An exhumation/scan of jfk would be interesting.

Any fragments in the hair (ie on the outside of the skull) ............... ................. Probly came from Oswald's shot-1 ricochet off the signals (at say pseudo Z105). ................ Possibly came from Hickey's shot which dented the chrome trim (at Z310). ................ Probly did not come from Hickey's headshot at Z313. I have not seen any expert opinions re Dr David O Davis' comment that some xray fragments were probly on the outside.

Hickey's last shot (the headshot)(say his shot-4) was at Z312. His shot-3 dented the chrome trim. His shot-2 might have hit tarmac (on a line halfway between the red-X & the south curb of Elm). Or it hit the concrete south curb of Elm. Or it hit the concrete paving between Elm & Main. In any case it passed say 12ft north of the manhole. His shot-1 probly hit the tarmac of Main & then the south curb of Main near Tague. I doubt that Ms Rachley (Baker) was in a position to see any of Hickey's ricochets, she was i think standing directly on his line of fire, but behind. She might have seen Oswald's shot-1 which ricocheted off the overhead signals, the remnant slug went throo the floor of the jfklimo & probly hit the driveshaft & tarmac. She did say that the sparks were behind the jfklimo, & that they were from the first of 3 shots.

The back to front path was probed from back to front. The probe stuck say halfway, showing that the path was not straight, ie the path was bent. But i don not know whether the path was probed from front to back. The bent path helps the SBT too.

Yes i agree that Connally's rhs is showing in that pix. But less so if jfk is moved hard right (say one head right), & Connally is moved a little left (say half a head)(& is turned to right)(& leans to left), & if Connally is lowered (say half a head). Plus we know that jfk had his right arm held high waving to his right, & as jfk goes behind the sign he is now looking to his left but his right arm is still held high but not as high, & we can assume that he is still holding his rt arm highish waving (to the african american dad&mum&son) at Z218 (shot-2). So, in the end, in the pix, we should have the inshoot on jfk's lower neck in line with the inshoot on Connally's shoulder blade. In which case Connally could be hit without hitting jfk, but only hi up on Connally's right shoulder, & hi up on left shoulder i suppose.

I think that Queen Mary was sitting at Z190. Should have been at Z218, ie about 2 limo lengths further down Elm, where jfk would be moreso in the way of a shot at Connally. And i think that that pix (taken from the SN) shows that Connally is sitting way too high, judging by the 3 heads in that 1964 pix (taken from the SN)(jfk head, Connally head, Kellerman head). Connally's head should be a lot lower than it is (in the pix from the SN). Even tho jfk in the back seat of Queen Mary is they say 10" too high (in every pix of Queen Mary) compared to his height in the jfklimo in 1963, all the same Connally is too high in Queen Mary (in the pix from the SN), by a lot.

Did they place the jfklimo at Z160 (wrong) or Z190 (wrong) or Z218 (correct, that is where shot-2 hit) or Z224 (wrong)?

Yes the SB might have gone straight. But the failed back to front probe test at autopsy demands that a scientific analysis include at least some veer inside jfk (did they try a front to back probe?). For example 4 deg of veer also probly helps the SBT laser etc analysis, koz 4 deg gives 2.5" of dogleg per 36" between jfk & Connally. And 4 deg of veer is not a big ask based on my memory of Carcano veer in gelatin on youtube etc. Alltho it has been shown that a Carcano usually goes fairly straight for a long distance in gelatin in most tests. Anyhow a Carcano might veer say 4 deg in 8" in jfk's lower neck (especially if the veer & consequent tumble is upwards) (due to impacting the skin on an angle, ie not squarely) (tests using an angled front face on gelatin with skin on the face would confirm this). Likewise that already slightly tumbling Carcano SB might have veered say 5 deg in 10" (upwards i suppose) while passing throo Connally. This upwards should also help a laser analysis i think (or would it hurt)(in which case i would have to play my a tumbling Carcano duznt veer card)(dunno).

Yes, the anti-SBTers have to replace a simple clearly correct SBT with 3 magic bullets. How silly. Re the SB hitting at Z224. U are wrong. Lattimer's tests show us that the SB hit at Z218-219. We see a slight jacket bulge in Z222 (it looks like a mini lapel flip)(but is actually mainly bulge), which deflates in Z223, & then we see a full lapel flip in Z224 (plus some bulge), all of which is in full accord with Lattimer's tests.

I have read your SBT wordage, & Dale Myers'. If the slug veered say 4 deg inside jfk then that changes the impact on Connally by 2.5" in 36" after exiting jfk. But apparently jelly tests show that a Carcano slug seldom veers much (in a short distance). If the slug veered 4 deg then that explains why the autopsy probe stuck (halfway along jfk). Put another way, the sticking probe proves there was veer. I dont remember which inshoots & outshoots were difficult to align, nor do i remember whether the difficulty involved too much or too little vertical angle (& horizontal angle). But a few deg of veer helps fix things for the SBT. i dont know whether this needed veer haztabe up or down or left or right. Up i think. In which case the slug yawed (tumbled) upwards. For sure the jfk & Connally positions & alignments can make a giant difference. But we dont really know what was what behind the sign. And the slug hit at Z218 (or Z219 at latest), when Jfk was "at" center of sign. Not Z169, not Z190, not Z224. Anyhow, Lattimer proved that the lapel flip could not happen unless the slug firstly passed throo jfk & had a large tumbling action when it exited Connally. But i know that u dont agree with this.

I dont remember anyone ever stating what should be obvious ie that slugs almost always veer inside a body/jelly/wax. I reckon that the SBT can invoke say 8 deg of veer (i think upwards) in say 8" while in jfk's neck/back. Why hasnt veer been mentioned/invoked? 8 deg of veer would also explain why the (stainless steel i suppose) thin probe at autopsy would not go all the way throo to the throat.

I see zero explanation of the critical assumptions re the position/angle of jfk & Connally.

Shooting. (Yes)(or shootings actually). Killing. (Yes)(Plus one attempted killing actually). Murder. (No)(An attempted murder actually). Assassination. (No)(An attempted assassination actually). Accidental Homicide. (Yes). So, we had an attempted murder, best described as an attempted assassination, plus an accidental homicide. And no murder. Is it too late to change the name of the film?

I said....Yes, but, re any science, there are always an infinite number of hypotheses that fit the evidence. ....................................But, re the jfka, there are zero hypotheses that fit the (so called) evidence. But, re jfka, there are many contradictions re any & all hypotheses. No hypothesis fits the evidence. And, there is only one correct hypothesis, & that is mine, that Hickey fired at Z312 (i say mine, but it came firstly from Donahue, then supported by McLaren)(but only i have explained that Hickey fired at least 4 shots). And, i doubt that my hypothesis has the least assumptions.

Yes, but, re any science, there are always an infinite number of hypotheses that fit the evidence. But, re the jfka, there are zero hypotheses that fit the (so called) evidence.

Connally has changed his story over the years. But, that there story duznt destroy the SBT. The problem is your logic or lack of it. First shot hits JFK ....... this is correct ...... Oswald's shot-1 ricocheted off the signal support arm...... shrapnel hitting JFK in the top back of head. Second shot hits Connally ...... correct........... Oswald's shot-2, the magic bullet, hit Connally & also hit JFK. Third shot hits JFK ................. correct ............ this was actually an accidental auto-burst of at least 4 shots from Hickey's AR15. So, Connally is correct, & duznt destroy the SBT.

That SSA Hickey shot jfk might be released after SSA Hill & SSA Landis have died.