Marjan Rynkiewicz

I googled. His trial at Dachau was probably in accord with Geneva convention etc. I did not read enough to see the details & to see whether Skorzeny should have been found guilty of a war crime -- or perhaps he was but didnt get a death sentence. A friend of mine (Stan)(polish) was a guard at the Dachau trials. He told me that he was particularly frightened of one prisoner -- in charge of tanks -- shot about 70 yank prisoners i believe -- but was not given a death sentence.

Finally, on 7 July 1937, Schacht and Goering signed an agreement of reconciliation in Berlin, wherein it was said that the tasks of Goering and Schacht "are being solved in closest mutual cooperation," and that "no doubt exists about the fact that the Commissioner General for War Economy has the position of a supreme authority of the Reich" Schacht resumed his duties as General Plenipotentiary with renewed vigor. On the day following his formal agreement with Goering, he wrote to General von Blomberg on "Measures for the preparation of the conduct of war," pledging continued cooperation in their mutual . . . . . . There is nothing to indicate that Schacht's withdrawal from the Ministry of Economics and the Office of Plenipotentiary for War Economy in any sense represented a break with Hitler on the ground of contemplated military aggression. He consented to retain his position as President of the Reichsbank, where he remained undisputed master, and accepted the post of Minister of Portfolio, in order to be Hitler's "personal adviser." In the letter accepting Schacht's resignation as Minister of Economics, Hitler said: As President of the Reichsbank, Schacht continued to carry out Hitler's policies. . . . . . . Although Schacht apparently sought to convey the impression to Ambassador Bullitt that he desired to stay Hitler's hand but was powerless to do so, it is clear that he was actually in complete sympathy with Hitler's objectives. Despite the mounting tension which followed his conversation with Ambassador Bullitt, Schacht remained as President of the Reichsbank, and in that capacity established, in advance of the invasion of Austria, the rate of exchange between Marks and Austrian Schillings which was to prevail after the absorption of Austria (EC-421). Moreover, under his direction, the Austrian National Bank was merged into the Reichsbank (Reichsgesetzblatt, 1938, I, 254). His speech of 21 March 1938, to the employees of the former Austrian National Bank on the occasion of its obliteration as an independent institution, betrayed his true feelings. After inveighing against "the dictates of Versailles and St. Germain", -Schacht stated: . . . (3) Conclusion. Schacht's assistance in the earlier phase of the conspiracy was an important factor in enabling the conspirators to seize the German state and thus pave the way for their later crimes. His 'work was indispensable to the rearmament of Germany and to the economic planning and preparation required to launch the German wars of aggression. As long as he remained in power, he worked as eagerly for the preparation of aggressive war as any of his co-conspirators. He personally was favorably disposed towards aggression, if "Lebensraum" for Germany could not otherwise be attained. He knew that Hitler intended to and would break the peace, and with this knowledge, he willingly and purposely contributed his efforts. His withdrawal from three of his four posts reflected no moral feeling against the use of aggressive warfare as an instrument of national policy; he withdrew for reasons wholly unrelated to Hitler's program of illegal aggression. By the time of his withdrawal from these three positions, he had already provided his co-conspirators with the physical means and economic planning necessary to launch and maintain their wars of aggression; and he continued in his lucrative fourth position (Minister without Portfolio) until January 1943-until, in short, it became doubtful ether the conspirators could maintain the successes which they had gained in the wars they had illegally launched and were waging. https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/nuremberg-trial-defendants-hjalmar-schacht Yes there was a conspiracy -- but it was not on German soil. Once again that there wording is all krapp. And, England & France declared war on Germany. All of that stuff is of interest to me but not worth arguing over today.

Ok -- except. Schacht was an idiot (ie like 99.99% of american economists). Schacht was sacked by Hitler. Schacht had zero to do with Hitler's economic miracle. Schacht committed zero war crimes. And the rest of your jfk wordage is krapp too.

I am not sure what this is all about. But the last frame of Towner's footage (T160) was i (today) think at pseudo Z111. Before today I thort that T160 was at pseudo Z118, based on the jfklimo going at 20 f/s when in that vicinity. Today my pseudo Z111 above is based on the limo going at 13.5 f/s & based on the limo being 20ft past where the limo was when Oswald fired his shot-1 (at which time jfk was hidden from Oswald by the overhead signal arm). My previous pseudo Z118 above was based on the limo going at 20 f/s (which was my original estimated speed). I am not sure what diff this makes to your calcs. Oswald's shot-1 was after T155 & before T156, based on T160 being Towner's last frame. If the Towner film is at the same rate as the Zapruder film then Oswald's shot-1 hit (the overhead signal arm) at pseudo Z104-105. Which is getting close to Holland's estimate many years ago of pseudo Z103. Before today i had said pseudo Z113, but today (based on the slower jfklimo speed) i reckon pseudo Z104-105.

What happened to the AR15? Where is it now? Who has it? It should be in a museum! A wax Hickey trying to stand fully up in the back of Queen Mary, holding the AR15, with finger on trigger. A wax Kinney Roberts O'Donnell Powers McIntyre Ready Landis Bennett -- a wax Hill in mid-air jumping onto the tarmac. Within an hour of being deployed for the first time the AR15 had killed a President -- albeit with the 4th or 5th shot. At least we have a photo of JFK holding the AR15 that killed him -- that photo will have to do for now. Is there some way of finding where the AR15 ended up? -- a government sale of some kind? -- a pawn shop in Washington? If SSA Lawton had been on the running board of Queen Mary then Landis would have been sitting between Hickey & Bennett in the backseat -- in which case Landis might have cramped Hickey's style & changed history.

Yes i have been re-reading Fetzer's stuff -- & watching his youtubes -- he mentions every factoid possible. But nowhere duz he get very close to any important fact.

The dent was made by a small hollow point AR15 slug (55 grain i think) with a thin copper jacket fired at say 3200 fps from 21 ft (muzzle to head) from directly behind by Hickey in Queen Mary. A thin stainless steel trim over a thickish rectangular hollow mild steel frame would stop the slug without leaving a hole -- especially as the slug hit slightly on the low side of a crease in the stainless -- especially as there was an air gap between the stainless & the mild steel. Some of the initially downwards lead spray from the slug (the slug hit the low side of the crease) damaged the rear-view mirror sitting below the dent. What was left of the slug (not much)(if any) was spat back & out onto the roadway. No known tests have ever been done to see if an AR15 would make such a dent. Nor to see if a Carcano would make such a dent.

Fetzer index mentions hole in windshield but not hole in floor. I wonder if anyone on this forum has any info re the hole in the floor. I could have a look to see if a shot from the roof of the records building would have a clear path to the floor -- i reckon that on that angle it would not have a clear path unless the jfklimo was much closer. But let us assume that the hole was from a shot from the roof of the records building -- then how would u explain the 2 half jacket fragments found in the jfklimo?

Diagram......................... Ah yes i see now that u did say that that diagram was made by others -- i thort that u made it -- thats why i insisted that u draw a red line for shot-10 (dent in chrome trim) & explain the who where when why. Shot-10......................... woz of course the 2nd last shot of Hickey's accidental autoburst -- the dent happened at Z310 (dent mentioned but red line missing in your dia). The cracked windshield .............. woz made by Hickey's last shot -- the crack happened at Z312-Z313 (crack not mentioned in your dia). There woz indeed a hole in the floorplan................ this was due to Oswald's shot-1 at pseudo-Z113 (Holland says Z103) -- but i am not aware of Fetzer mentioning this hole in his book Murder In Dealey Plaza -- do u know what Fetzer actually wrote? Shot-5................................ Your dia shows a red line for shot-5 from the roof of the courthouse or whatever that building is & says that that might have been the shot that made the hole in the floorpan -- do u know where that dia for shot-5 came from?

Yes -- but u did not provide details of your shot-10. Clearly the dent was made by a bullet, in Dealey Plaza But who? how? when? why?

Had a look. I took a series of nice screenprints at 3 or 4 parts of the footage. One of Queen Mary with Hickey sitting hi up. One with Queen Mary with Powers standing hi up. One with jfklimo when it was passing a bus (where can i find the original). Worst bit of the whole footage -- Dr Wecht as usual, re his objection to the SBT -- crickey what an idiot.

Tell me more about (10) the nick in the chrome trim.

I have seen it said that Hickeyists like myself number about 27% of the jfkcrowd. However as we can see Hickeyists left the JFK forums a long time ago – i am a on my own on the Ed-forum. Hickeyists don’t waste their time re conspiracies etc, even if the conspiracies are true – they might be true, but they don’t affect the shots fired in Dealey Plaza. Comparing the jfksaga to the jesus-saga etc is interesting. I wonder whether thinking-atheists like myself have an advantage (re getting to the truth of the jfksaga) over non-thinking-atheists & thinking-christianists. I think that we thinking-atheists do have an advantage. I found the truth in about 1 year. The corollary is that all of the dullards blundering around & bumping into each other for years here on this & other forums are christianists. Mightbeso.

I have no doubts that Hickey killed JFK. Nor any doubts about the essentials of what i have written about the jfk saga . U should read my stuff. All of the essentials are true. Then armed with that info u can re-read the krapp floating around. I made mistakes in my say first year. For example, i reckoned that Z313 was the first shot of his accidental autoburst -- but later i realized that it was the last shot.

I am sure. I explained who shot who etc (in Dealy Plaza) in late 2020 -- with a few minor upgrades up to mid 2022. Oswald shot-1 was at about pseudo Z113 (Holland says Z103) -- ricochet offa the overhead signal arm -- main slug makes a keyhole in floor of jfklimo -- 2 large metal jacket halves found in jfklimo -- lead splatter hits jfk on head (xrays). Oswald shot-2 was at Z216 -- hits jfk & Connally at Z218-219. Hickey's accidental autoburst of at least 4 shots at say Z300 to Z312 -- ricochet wounds Tague -- makes dent in chrome trim -- jfk's head explodes (remnant slug cracks windshield). Re the peripheral verbiage that we can read re the jfk saga re the CIA FBI Johnson Mafia Cuba Castro & Co -- i have never wasted much time on any of that -- there might be some good stuff in there (but nothing that affects my above shots). Re the verbiage re a supposed hole in the windshield & re a supposed shooter behind the fence etc -- i have never wasted much time on any of that -- there aint any good stuff in there. Yes -- the SS got away with it (the accidental homicide) -- yes, the American people lost. Will the truth re the SS come out? -- i reckon that there will be an SS whistle-blower in the near future.

Ah yes -- my previous dis-respective comment was deleted by a moderator. But the question arises -- does Trump know what i know & what Biden knows?

My comments accord with your OP, u said that -- After 60 years the JFKA records are still radioactive. Yeah sure, lone gunman did the deed. And my comment above is in full accord (ie that Oswald was not a lone gunman) -- but u accuse me of disrespect of other viewpoints. I have no doubt that my viewpoint re Hickey is true (& that my viewpoint that that is why Biden will not release the records is true) -- but whether i have respect for other viewpoints depends -- but i agree that we should all show respect.

Any earlier CIA or FBI etc connection to Oswald is only a side issue -- slightly embarrassing (if true)(who cares)(i dont). But there can be no greater embarrassment than that SSA Hickey accidentally shot his boss. I thort that the truth (files) might come out when SSA Hill dies -- but now i dont think so. The embarrassment would be magnified koz it would become apparent that the WC was a cover-up. So, who on the WC knew -- a slightly interesting topic for analysis.

Yes – your arrow is to Bennett's cheekbone. For what its worth – here is what Zapruder frames show re Bennett……. ……………..……….. Z133 – We can't see Bennett. Z134 – Blurry. Z135 to Z139 – Bennett is looking a bit right as usual. Z140 to Z143 – Might be looking straight ahead. Z144 to Z153 – A bit right again. …………………….. Z154 to Z159 – Blurry or bad. Z160 to Z163 – Bennett possibly looking straight ahead or even a bit left (he is half hidden by SSA standing). …………….………. Z164 & later – Bennett completely hidden by SSA standing – or is out of frame.

Bennett's memory is probly as bad as SSA Hill's. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vzYwCmDDSLA&t=27s Hill said that the headshot was as he was climbing onto the limo – he said that it was just before he grabbed the grip (which he called "handle") – he grabbed the grip at Z340, hence that shot would have been at say Z336 (the Zapruder film runs at 18.3 fps). At 26:45 Hill says that he heard an explosion over his right shoulder (this might have been Oswald's shot-2 at Z219). Hill in this youtube said that he did not hear a shot that was fired as he was running – but he learnt of this shot later -- this shot would have been let us say halfway between Z219 & Z336 – ie at say Z277. So, if one tries to make much sense out of Hill's words in this youtube then we would have to say that Hill considered that there had been shots at Z219, Z277 & Z336. But, we know that the shots were at pseudo Z113 (Oswald), Z218-Z219 (Oswald), then a burst of 4 or 5 or 6 shots at say Z300 to Z313 (Hickey). Hence Hill's memory is as bad as all of the rest ovem. In the Zapruder footage we can see that Hill (had already jumped) &….. Hill was wildly running next to the left front wheel of Queen Mary at the time of the headshot at Z312. Puts his left hand on the grip at Z340. Right hand on the limo at Z350. Right hand on the grip at Z 353. Left foot on the footrest at Z Z368. Right foot on the footrest at Z384. Right hand touches Jacki at Z 390 (Zapruder film runs at 18.3 fps).

Bennett heard a firecracker noise (Oswald's shot-1 at pseudo Z113), then another firecracker noise (or shot)(Oswald's shot-2 at Z218-Z219), then he heard & saw a shot (the headshot)(which would have been the last shot of Hickey's accidental autoburst of at least 4 shots of Hickey's AR15 (from say Z300 to Z313). Armed with this info u can then analyse any & all statements -- & u will see that much of what was said by all of the SSAs was wrong. So, we can't make much sense of what Bennett (& Hill)(& the others) said – they had critical aspects (particularly when) wrong.

The WCR was of course a coverup. My wordage was meant to say that the WC & Co did not have anything to fear from Brennan (or did they). This forum is about the same as others -- full of LNers & CTers -- the Hickeyists like myself left years ago. I stick around from time to time koz i find that the irrelevant peripheral stuff is often interesting -- & some of it surprizingly affects my Hickey theory (i mean my version of the Hickey theory).

Brennan heard 2 shots -- he did not see any discharge(s) -- we know from his wordage that Oswald had stood up when Hickey fired his auto burst. And, there is nothing in any of Brennan's wordage that would obviously directly contradict the WC -- nothing that he had already said, nothing that he said later, & nothing that he could possibly have said -- END OF STORY -- except that i have not read his book (praps he did contradict the WC in his book)(but that would be contra to everything that he was already on record as saying) -- hmmmm, did he ever expand on the saga of the line-up where he i think fingered Oswald.

Is there a Groden critique of the Hickey AR15 theory?

Its simple -- the only smoke was from Hickey's autoburst of 4 or 5 or 6 shots. The AR15 had smoking problems until the smoking was fixed in about 1970.