James DiEugenio Posted August 1, 2019 Share Posted August 1, 2019 (edited) Well, Tulsi Gabbard finally took my advice on Kamala Harris. And Huffpost followed up today. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/tulsi-gabbard-kamala-harris-criminal-justice-record_n_5d424340e4b0aca3411841fb But still no RFK mention. That is the most important part of all this. Laurie Dusek should write an editorial. Edited August 1, 2019 by James DiEugenio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James DiEugenio Posted August 2, 2019 Share Posted August 2, 2019 This is really good. I think Tulsi just knocked Harris for a well deserved standing eight count Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James DiEugenio Posted August 2, 2019 Share Posted August 2, 2019 Why will no one bring up what she did in the RFK case!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
W. Niederhut Posted August 2, 2019 Author Share Posted August 2, 2019 Gabbard is getting slammed in the mainstream media today for declining to play along with the false narrative about the CIA's Operation Timber Sycamore to overthrow the Assad regime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James DiEugenio Posted August 2, 2019 Share Posted August 2, 2019 (edited) Pretty predictable after what she did in the first two debates. They are also trying to say she is pro Russian. I mean really, does the USA have probably the worst media in the world or what? Tulsi was absolutely right on Syria. And so was Putin. If you read my article in the last issue of garrison I addressed this issue head on. The Power Elite wants to play the extremes in the Middle East against each other--Likud and the fundamentalists. Assad is a secularist so he was on their hit list. Putin understood that. So did Tulsi. Edited August 2, 2019 by James DiEugenio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joseph McBride Posted August 2, 2019 Share Posted August 2, 2019 (edited) The neoliberal McCarthyites are trying to attack Gabbard as pro-Russian by dredging up a claim by a firm that was exposed in February for fabricating Russian t-r-o-l-l [I didn't know that word was banned here] accounts on behalf of the Democratic Party! https://theintercept.com/2019/02/03/nbc-news-to-claim-russia-supports-tulsi-gabbard-relies-on-firm-just-caught-fabricating-russia-data-for-the-democratic-party/?fbclid=IwAR0mE2Guxa7KA6bdSunbEVUd6zdODt8Wg76prGDTJFJwLluERnqKq68X4do Edited August 2, 2019 by Joseph McBride Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joseph McBride Posted August 2, 2019 Share Posted August 2, 2019 (edited) Just now, Joseph McBride said: see previous post Edited August 2, 2019 by Joseph McBride Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joseph McBride Posted August 2, 2019 Share Posted August 2, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew Prutsok Posted August 2, 2019 Share Posted August 2, 2019 (edited) I'm undecided on Gabbard, but it's damned hard to support someone supported and defended by the likes of Breitbart and Alex Jones. Why do they support her? And I thought where she nailed Harris good was on her health plan, where Harris was touting Sebelius' endorsement. Edited August 2, 2019 by Andrew Prutsok More info Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew Prutsok Posted August 2, 2019 Share Posted August 2, 2019 It's like having Goebbels' endorsement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Bauer Posted August 3, 2019 Share Posted August 3, 2019 (edited) 3 hours ago, Andrew Prutsok said: I'm undecided on Gabbard, but it's damned hard to support someone supported and defended by the likes of Breitbart and Alex Jones. Why do they support her? And I thought where she nailed Harris good was on her health plan, where Harris was touting Sebelius' endorsement. Alex Jones and Breitbart support and defend who? Gabbard? Or Harris? Edited August 3, 2019 by Joe Bauer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Brancato Posted August 3, 2019 Share Posted August 3, 2019 38 minutes ago, Joe Bauer said: Alex Jones and Breitbart support and defend who? Gabberd? Or Harris? Who cares? They can say anything they want, for whatever raason they want, quite possibly with hidden agendas. She was in CNN yesterday late morning, and refreshingly called out the anchor for doing what every single CNN anchor who has had her on for two years has done - question her meeting with Assad. It seems obvious to me that consensus is being manufactured by our not so free media. If we don’t like Trump, we get to take instead an old white man who can’t say a complete sentence without stumbling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirk Gallaway Posted August 3, 2019 Share Posted August 3, 2019 Obviously it would be Gabbard Joe. If there's any truth to it, she better renounce them or she's flaming toast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew Prutsok Posted August 5, 2019 Share Posted August 5, 2019 On 8/2/2019 at 6:53 PM, Joe Bauer said: Alex Jones and Breitbart support and defend who? Gabbard? Or Harris? Gabbard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
W. Niederhut Posted August 5, 2019 Author Share Posted August 5, 2019 Fellas, IMO, it's somewhat unfair to judge anyone on the basis of putative "endorsements" by dubious sources. Guys like Goebbels and Hitler probably thought that Bach and Beethoven were great composers. Even the nuttiest nuts aren't wrong 100% percent of the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now