• Announcements

    • Evan Burton


      We are opening registration!! If you are interested, please send an email to: edforumbusiness@outlook.com We require you use your real name, a valid email address, and your agreement to the Terms of Use, seen here: http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=21403. Additionally, you will have to send us your photo for use as an avatar and submit a brief biography. We will post these for you, and send you your password. We cannot approve membership until we receive these. We look forward to having you as a part of the Forum! Sincerely, The Education Forum Team

David Josephs

  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About David Josephs

  • Rank
    Super Member

Contact Methods

  • ICQ

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Interests

Recent Profile Visitors

17,307 profile views
  1. This is Feb 25, the day after the memo Bill links us to... A supervisor is already explaining away the errors and mistakes of a subordinate... in turn, the FM-11 which is the "master record" says he leaves by "auto" on Oct 3. If the plan on Oct 3 is still to associate an Oswald with others, he'd leave in a car driven by others. if that was the original plan. a change to that plan to say Lone Nut with no associations... the CIA association of Oswald with others has to disappear or be disavowed - ala Alvarado or in this case... H. O. Lee (O.H. Lee) leaving or arriving by car driven by others. The "actual" FM-11 requested in the FBI doc is/was in the hands of the FBI asset, who, it was said, added to the FM-11 for clarity.
  2. more than one looks strange.... well done Chris... do you suppose this corroborates Truly's testimony, cause we could use some... I've found no one who says the same thing or any images of the turn itself... Hughes is only the start of the turn? and you'd think Dorman would have seen it... of course Dorman wasn't called
  3. http://erenow.com/modern/the-devils-chessboard-allen-dulles-the-cia/18.html Mark Wyatt was attending a meeting at the Gladio base in Sardinia with Bill Harvey when he heard that President Kennedy had been shot at high noon in Dallas. When the telex arrived, in the early evening local time, Wyatt found Harvey collapsed in bed, following a late-afternoon round of martinis. After Wyatt managed to rouse him, the CIA station chief blurted out some provocative remarks about the events in Dallas that deeply disturbed Wyatt for the rest of his life. According to his three children, Wyatt, who died in 2006, at eighty-six, would always suspect that Harvey had some prior knowledge of the Kennedy assassination or was in some way involved. ---- a bit further down I wouldn’t be surprised to learn that Harvey was in Dallas in November 1963,” House Assassinations Committee investigator Dan Hardway, who was assigned by the panel to probe possible CIA connections to JFK’s murder, observed years later. “We considered Harvey to be one of our prime suspects from the very start. He had all the key connections—to organized crime, to the CIA station in Miami where the plots against Castro were run, to other prime CIA suspects like David Phillips. We tried to get Harvey’s travel vouchers and security file from the CIA, but they always blocked us. But we did come across a lot of memos that suggested he was traveling a lot in the months leading up to the assassination.” (More recent legal efforts by the author to obtain Harvey’s travel records from the CIA also proved fruitless, despite the 1992 JFK Records Act, which required all federal agencies to release documents related to the Kennedy assassination.)
  4. I have Wilderness of Mirrors at home.... been a while since I read it but will take a look to see if there's anything about Harvey, Dallas and 11/22. Interesting book btw... about Angleton and Harvey.
  5. Again, thanks for the kind words... Bill was very helpful identifying the players... we emailed while I was working on this back in 2015 and keep in contact from time to time... I read his work enthusiastically - downloading State Secret before many even knew about it... Since so few have taken the time to look at every day OTHER than Sept 25 - Oct 3, Bill's work digs so deep into the CIA, FBI, etc... that the trip itself is usually overlooked. Here is one of the last replies related to my Work.... As you delve into the other 4 papers I address each and every attempt to ID Oswald on these buses - the cornerstones to the FBI's MC trip story... "Here's Hoover in Feb. 64 talking about how even with extra men, every lead in Mexico City fizzles out. At some point, you might consider a chrono of similar statements. Bill https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=62477&relPageId=25
  6. Thanks for the kind words Eddy... That was part 1... only 4 more parts for you to go... There is no doubt that "an Oswald" could have been flown into Mexico by "Ferrie" for example. Yet we understand that Goodpasture conjures up Oswald on Oct 8th for reasons OTHER than the photo of the man, or the voice of the man was Oswald. All the proof that tries to put Oswald with Duran actually conflicts rather than supports him being there. My POV was that the FBI is forced to cover for the CIA due to Oswald being on a FBI mission at the time. The CIA put Oswald down there with the Oct 10 memo to FBI/State/Navy. Hoover ultimately tells LBJ "there was a second man down there using his name" rather than "Our Oswald was not there". It is my POV that Hoover covers for the CIA here to cover his own skin. IF I am right and Oswald was at Odio's as I suspect... Hoover's FBI had to cover for them after Nov 22nd otherwise an FBI asset is connected to the JFK assassination. Hoover would not allow that... so with the help of an amazing asset, they create, then recreate the evidence getting Oswald from here to there.... Don't you suppose if anyone wanted a paper trail for Oswald going to MC all they'd need is a bus ticket. lol So one question is whether or not Oswald and Mexico City really had anything to do with each other.... I think the person OSWALD had little if anything to do with OSWALD the man GOODPASTURE created...
  7. Larry, That's actually a composite of 4 or 5 documents showing the FBI search for Oswald after the fact... IMO Hoover knew Oswald was not there, but for some reason covered the CIA's butt. Not sure if you've taken the time to read thru the 6 chapters I did on the Mexico City Travel evidence at CTKA/Kings.... https://kennedysandking.com/john-f-kennedy-articles/mexico-city-part-2-the-trip-down-part-1 From what I can tell, no on e has looked at the travel as opposed to the time in MC. There are thousands of docs spread out all over the WCDocs with no rhyme or reason. So I organized them. The first thing I did for this writing project was to acquire the documents and put them in chronological order... Who knew what , when and how. What I found was that all the evidence the FBI finally used to place Oswald here or there was funneled thru one man in Mexico City... the #2 man at Gobernacion had his hands on virtually everything... with comments by those who were aware that he added notes and made changes to the FM-11 (master list of Tourist Visas from the border) Everything the FBI got were COPIES of items from this man... he is even the source for the ARTURO BOSCH altered FRONTERA bus manifest which he changed to match the needed departure date and time. Under Hoover's signature, this "accepted evidence for how Oswald left MC was later found to not work with the bus schedule and Oswald being in Dallas on Oct 3. This is just the tip of the iceberg Larry... the FBI was very detailed in their charade here... the physical evidence does come from the locations offered... just not related to a man named Oswald. (The McFarlands and the Australian girls are provable plants used to place Oswald on a bus and nothing more. I can only suggest you wade thru the work I did... The FBI's story falls apart with the same gusto is was cobbled together Cheers DJ WCD 78 p1 tells us that by Nov 23th the FBI had information that the Mexican Officials were able to find and relay information from the “official records” of the Mexican Government which they had been alerted to no later than the early morning of Nov 23rd. A few pages later the FBI tells us that according to their Mexican confidential sources, Oswald was on the Transportes Frontera bus #340 leaving at 1pm Oct 2nd. This information not only turns out to be wrong but specifically created by a Mexican Presidential Staff Official Arturo Bosch in front of the bus line personnel. (Part 3 will delve deeper into the evidence related to Mr. Bosch)
  8. 33 frames? and Z starts at 100 + 33? And it's SPECTER who insists that POSITION A is somehow involved... Mr. SPECTER. Were you able to ascertain the speed of the Presidential limousine at the time of the assassination? Mr. SHANEYFELT. Yes; because we were able to determine the speed of the camera, and thereby accurately determine the length of time it takes for a specific number of frames to run through the camera at this 18.3 frames per second, and having located these frame positions in the street, we took the farthest distance point we had in the Zapruder film which was frame 161 through frame 313. Mr. SHANEYFELT. The first position we established that morning was frame 161. Mr. SPECTER. Was there not a position established prior in sequence to frame 161, specifically that designated as position A? Mr. SHANEYFELT. That was actually established later. But the first one to be actually located was 161. And we went back later and positioned point A. Mr. SPECTER. Well, let's start with the position which is the most easterly point on Elm Street, which I believe would be position A, would it not? Mr. SHANEYFELT. Yes. Mr. SHANEYFELT. This is an album that I prepared of black and white photographs made of the majority of the frames in the Zapruder film---- Mr. SPECTER. Starting with what frame number? Mr. SHANEYFELT. Starting with frame 171, going through frame 334. Mr. SPECTER. And why did you start with frame 171? Mr. SHANEYFELT. This is the frame that the slides start from. This was an arbitrary frame number that was decided on as being far enough back to include the area that we wanted to study. I find it interesting that they did all they could to exclude info prior to z161 (which was originally z168 and changed for CE884) yet still insist on discussing the significance of POS A. Mr. SPECTER. Was there any prior position, that is a position before position A, where the marksman from the sixth floor could have fired the weapon and have struck the President at the known point of entry at the base of the back of his neck? Mr. SHANEYFELT. No; because as the car moves back, you lose sight of the chalk mark on the back of his coat. Mr. SPECTER. So that would be the first position where the marksman could focus in on the circled point where the point of entry on the President was marked? Mr. SHANEYFELT. That is correct. That is simply not true at all. Bottom left... roll the limo back, you don't lose sight of anything while the "chalk mark" on the coat rises... a simple movement of the rifle adjusts for that... so why Shaneyfelt would claim what he does here, and relate it back to the window - when according to Shaneyfelt the limo was never at Position A. Any thoughts on why all the effort, images and explanations related to this spot the limo had never supposedly driven thru... unless you listen to TRULY. Mr. SHANEYFELT. This shows the photograph that was made from the point where Zapruder was standing looking toward the car, and is a point that we have designated as position A because it is in a position that did not appear on the Zapruder film The Zapruder film does not start until the car gets farther down Elm Street. It takes 81 frames for the motorcycle prior to 133 to disappear into that TSBD/Elm street corner and reemerge.... The motorcycle in a few frames is in the exact same spot as Position A. Here is that bike with Pos A for the stand-in limo behind it... When you click frame by frame on TOWNER... during and just after that turn it appears to me that the limo is moving sideways, not rolling forward, but that may be an illusion of the perspective. Somehow from that spot, the limo gets to z133. Both the Towner and Z films are altered to remove that turn
  9. I took these as a good indication that Hoover understood Oswald was not there during the time in question. The Alvarado story does make a little sense, yet in my mind, Alvarado is not enough of an incentive for Hoover to cover the CIA's butt by creating fake travel documents/history with his Mexican assets... and Alvarado didn't show up for a couple days... the Presidential "guard" - Arturo Bosch being the Frontera related one - was at the 4 bus line office in both north and south Mexico... FBI even claimed it was the ANAHUAC line that Oswald arrived on... These reports thought, didn't make the final report or were even in consideration it appears. Finally, if it was Oswald... both the hotel registry and Visa are terribly incorrect. The Visa application was for a 6 month visa for Harvey Oswald Lee. The hotel registry is signed "Lee, Harvey Oswald"... exactly the same as the mismatched VISA. It was from there that I began my journey... always good hearing from you Larry. DJ ps - if Odio is not enough... any thoughts on this proof? Wasn't Oswald spotted in Dallas at the shooting on the 28th of Sept?
  10. Here you go Sandy... a name you WILL find interesting. Look for Esquire article... related to Tippit murder... maybe
  11. Larry - Thanks for your thoughts on this... I have a different view of the trip of course... One last point... Hoover's handwritten notation about CIA double dealing regarding Oswald's trip to Mexico... Given the FBI reports from Nov 1963 all stating no evidence for Oswald anywhere in Mexico, AND knowing Mystery man was not Oswald AND the fact that so much of the Mexico Evidence was acquired by locals on the 22nd only to be funneled thru one person, one of the FBI's top Mexican Government assets... AND the rifle that was supposedly at Magazine street somehow winds up in and out of the Paine garage - sight unseen. It almost appears that the FBI is hiding the fact he didn't go by offering up evidence which is so shoddy on its face. I think Oswald was traveling, in and around Dallas, and then in Dallas itself on the 4th of Oct. After a week with no contact, Marina supposedly hung up on him when he asked her to ask Ruth for a ride home. There'd be no reason for Oswald to go to Mexico City and NOT leave tell tale signs of this trip - if that was the point. the evidence does not bear this out... Cheers.
  12. Larry - Given your conclusion about Oswald in MC... Who do you think LEON was at Odio's door?
  13. Sorry you thought that was a goad... not my intent. Sounded like you wanted to have a conversation.. again, no worries. Hope you find something that sparks passion DJ
  14. No real worries Tommy... I know it's not on purpose.... As for H&L... Theories not withstanding, which bits of evidence supporting H&L bothers you the most? I'd prefer we don't discuss what Armstrong speculates upon... Can we just stick with the evidence available to us? All the reading and research I've done in these areas leads me to understand that there's virtually nothing under the sun which can be conceived that has not been tried, so I stop asking WHY - human beings are some depraved MF's - those with power revel in messing with the lives of others... I'd also prefer we dropped the incredulity... just because something sounds far -fetched or strange by our standards does not mean it is not possible or has not already been done or tried. As for Trump - Never believe anything until it has been officially denied Try watching the news with that understanding and it's amazing how clear everything becomes.... "Any collusion with the Russians?" "No. No. Next Question"
  15. "larger story less credible" - which larger story Michael? I tried to stay away from things like "sounds credible"... the evidence left for us tells a specific story... the truth tends to be easily corroborated after the fact... lies on the other hand, and created evidence have a much tougher time keeping things straight. The first batches of BUS TRIP EVIDENCE which came from Mexico was completely wrong despite it being accepted as evidence of Oswald's visit... when it no longer could stand up to scrutiny, it was dropped. simply dropped by Hoover in favor of something else that could work... like "he took this (or that) bus since it was the only bus to get his to his destination when we say he got there" Mexican Presidential guards showed up at each of the 4 bus lines on 11/22 and "borrowed" all the evidence. The MC story is symptomatic of the entire WCR... Desired conclusion unsupported - in fact contradicted - by the actual evidence gathered at the time and from subsequent investigations without the government's bias. Well Michael - I did about 300 pages on the trip and evidence... This charade unfolds amazingly.. I hope I've done it some justice... https://kennedysandking.com/content/the-evidence-is-the-conspiracy-index is the index to all my work but you'll see the 6 Mexico Chapters in this list. It took the FBI over 2000 documents to explain that Oswald went to Mexico - when all they needed was a single bus ticket... which they finally did get from Marina. Enjoy the ride DJ