Jake Hammond Posted December 16, 2018 Author Share Posted December 16, 2018 Quote JFK wasn't leaning forward as you suggest, and the fold in his jacket was a fraction of an inch. Another gem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cliff Varnell Posted December 16, 2018 Share Posted December 16, 2018 1 minute ago, Jake Hammond said: Another gem. Another contentless non-rebuttal. The Towner and Altgens photos destroy your "educated assumption." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cliff Varnell Posted December 16, 2018 Share Posted December 16, 2018 33 minutes ago, Sandy Larsen said: I can't see how anybody could honestly say that it is a fact that Kennedy's shirt behaved that way. Honesty has nothing to do with the fraud perpetrated in this thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake Hammond Posted December 16, 2018 Author Share Posted December 16, 2018 Come on, say something coherent, string a sentence together with a premise and some content, form a null hypothesis and suggest somethings. I can't make anything of these half sentence aggressions. One last chance Cliff at making a point and then I'll give up on making an effort. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cliff Varnell Posted December 16, 2018 Share Posted December 16, 2018 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Jake Hammond said: Come on, say something coherent, string a sentence together with a premise and some content, form a null hypothesis and suggest somethings. I can't make anything of these half sentence aggressions. One last chance Cliff at making a point and then I'll give up on making an effort. When I posted the Towner photo you turned uncomprehending. There is nothing I can help you with, since you can't observe that photo. I trust the gentle reader grasps my points. Edited December 16, 2018 by Cliff Varnell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake Hammond Posted December 16, 2018 Author Share Posted December 16, 2018 Ok, I'll sign off then . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cliff Varnell Posted December 16, 2018 Share Posted December 16, 2018 2 minutes ago, Jake Hammond said: Ok, I'll sign off then . Throwing a rumpled shirt on a mannequin, adding a black line or two and a bunch of unproven assumptions, doesn't really count as "signing on." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Johnson Posted December 16, 2018 Share Posted December 16, 2018 I have some major issues with the evidence regarding JFK's clothing. Images taken for a supplemental report prepared in Dec63/Jan64 are shown below of the jacket bullet entry and then of the business shirt entry. You will need to zoom in to get a closer look at the actual entry points and the shape they leave in JFK's clothing. These images were taken within a week of the 11/22/63. The exact date is not known by me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Johnson Posted December 16, 2018 Share Posted December 16, 2018 Here now are images of JFK's suit jacket and business shirt wound entry points in the National archives.....anyone see anything different? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cliff Varnell Posted December 17, 2018 Share Posted December 17, 2018 Adam, the FBI cut pieces of the fabric around the defects for testing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron Ecker Posted December 17, 2018 Share Posted December 17, 2018 Also, as I recall, LBJ had the clothes cleaned before handing them over the FBI. Thus the shirt looks cleaner in the later photo. But LBJ wouldn't tamper with evidence (or withhold it from the autopsy), he was just a gentle thoughtful soul. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake Hammond Posted December 17, 2018 Author Share Posted December 17, 2018 11 hours ago, Cliff Varnell said: Adam, the FBI cut pieces of the fabric around the defects for testing. Yes, it looks like the fabric has a small splice top and bottom. I'm agreeing with you Cliff, lets leave it there. Also please note the relatively coarse weave and thickness of the shirt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 17, 2018 Share Posted December 17, 2018 1 hour ago, Ron Ecker said: Also, as I recall, LBJ had the clothes cleaned before handing them over the FBI. Thus the shirt looks cleaner in the later photo. But LBJ wouldn't tamper with evidence (or withhold it from the autopsy), he was just a gentle thoughtful soul. I'm pretty sure you're talking about Nellie Connally having her husband's clothing cleaned, but then I'm just a Lone Nutter. If LBJ sent JFK's clothes to One-Hour Martinizing ("Fresh as a flower in just one hour!" - or maybe not, in this instance), even I would find that mildly suspicious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake Hammond Posted December 17, 2018 Author Share Posted December 17, 2018 (edited) even I would find that mildly suspicious. Lance its slightly off topic but if we keep it to one or two posts can I ask your explanations of a few of the potentially 'suspicious' events of the JFK case ? Edited December 17, 2018 by Jake Hammond Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron Ecker Posted December 17, 2018 Share Posted December 17, 2018 I'm not talking about the Connallys. But I'm sure Cliff or someone will correct me if my recollection of LBJ having the clothes cleaned is mistaken. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now