Ray Mitcham

Part of the article. " Critics questioned how, based on some forensic findings, a bullet fired from the sixth floor to the ground level entered Kennedy’s back and then traveled upward to exit through the throat. Perry apparently wondered, too. Three years after the surgeon’s death, Miller (A fellow surgeon) claimed in a little-noticed 2012 blog post that Perry doubted the scenario. The author of three books and a frequent writer on current medical and political topics, Miller wrote: “Fifteen years [after the shooting], Dr. Perry told me in a surgeon-to-surgeon private conversation that the bullet wound in Kennedy’s neck was, without question, a wound of entrance, irrespective of what he had told the Warren Commission. “This seasoned attending trauma surgeon had seen a lot of gunshot wounds at Parkland Hospital and knew what he was talking about. Dr. Perry also told this ‘off the record’ truth to another physician, Dr. Robert Artwohl, in 1986.” Artwhol, an Anchorage surgeon who wrote an online post about their conversation, stated that Perry told him that “[o]ne of the biggest regrets in his life was having to make the incision for the emergency tracheotomy through the bullet wound… Speaking with Dr. Perry that night, one physician to another, Dr. Perry stated he firmly believed the wound to be an entrance wound.” But, Miller said in his blog that after agent Moore and others pressured Perry to alter his story, “This otherwise bold surgeon backed down and obligingly changed his testimony to suit the politically ordered truth that Oswald did it.”"

Nobody altered the image. It's all in your mind, John. You seem to be obsessed with the alleged alteration of photos, despite being shown how wrong you are. You don't even understand telephoto lenses. You say that Altgens 6 has been cropped. Where did you get this notion? Now you are saying that somebody for some unknown nefarious reason, has altered the shape of the limo tire. Are you completely mad or just pretending?

😁

Quite right, Tony. I wonder if it might have anything to do with the weight of the limo.😀

Just shows how incompetent the doctors at Parkland were, Rick.😂

Quote by Butler "As far as the trool Ray Meacham, he is not worth talking to." What is a "trool" and who is "Ray Meacham"?You can't even get the spellings correct let alone any of your make believe evidence of photo alteration.

Thanks Tony. Won't make any difference to Mr Magoo, though.

There are certain people in this world who seem to exist totally out of it. They see things that don't exist and invent "facts" that are totally wrong. "This is a clear case of image alteration" Only in your mind, soft lad. Perhaps you could try to explain why anybody would alter the shadows of a car tire and of spectators..

It's not altered, you prat. It's the shadow making it look like that. But then you have always had problems with shadows haven't you, John?

Won't make any difference to Mr Magoo, Chris.

Thanks Tony. Must have taken some time to prepare the montage. It certainly shows the line of sight if you line up the landmarks. I don't think I have to add anything to your composite which shows the limited field of view of Altgens camera. It certainly shows where the Stemmons sign was in relation to the photo. Still don't think that it will make any difference to Mr Butler as he is wedded to his belief that the photograph was faked.

Joe it could be Charles Brehm who was there with his small son.

Totally and completely wrong. This Roberdeaus' Dealey Plaza sketch showing the field of view of Altgens 6. (from the objects shown in the photo)Note that neither the Stemmons Street sign or the Thornton Sign are within the field of view shown. (The Stemmons Street sign has an arrow pointing to it.) Just click on to enlarge to see in more detail.

This is a photo showing the differences in field of view from a wide angle to a telephoto lens. Note how in the telephoto lens photo the little boy has disappeared NOT because of any alteration to the photo but due to the narrowness of the field of view of the lens. the same thing happened in Z6. The field of view was too narrow to show either of the street signs. but you are too dumb to realise it.

John, I hate to come in again to show where you are wrong, but you don't seem to learn. The reason the Stemmons sign isn't in Altgens 6 is because the field of view of his camera wasn't large enough to include it. If the Stemmons sign had been in the shot you would have seen the Western end of the TSBD in view. As it is you can only see the middle of the South side of the TSBD, where the third dividing buttress (between the windows in the centre of the South face of the building) can only be seen. Even the Thornton Sign isn't in the photo, the field of view is so narrow.

Video on you Tube.

Duplicate post.

Andrej, in the stick model, his right foot is not directly under his head as it appears in the photo. It needs moving to our right, or to his left. This will make a huge difference. And what makes you think his left leg should be raised?

Thanks, Bart.

Bart, I've always said that pigeons rising from a roof shows only that a loud noise was made, from somewhere close, not that it was from the place they were perching. Any rifle shot in the vicinity of Dealey Plaza would have the same reaction by the pigeons. They would have just flown off. Baker's comment that he went into the TSBD because of he birds reaction is a lot of hooey. They would have risen no matter where in Dealey the shot emanated.

Thanks for the reply, Denis.

Can you publish the said photos, Denis?

It cost $20m to set up and then the cat was hit by a car, ten feet from where it was released. 🤣

Could it have been Oswald, as Mr Campbell said he saw Os just inside the small cupboard in the vestibule, after the shooting?