Ray Mitcham

Quote by Jim De E "In the first part its pretty obvious that Oswald was leafleting to leftist groups in hopes of snuffing out some Castro sympathizers." I sincerely hope you meant "sniffing out", Jim. "Snuffing out" seems a bit over the top.😎

Quote by John Butler "The north wall has only 3 windows widely spaced over 100 feet per floor." No. The North side of the TSBD has 5 windows across its width. The blue line shown as "The Elevators" on Jim's photo covers too much area for the elevators. The horizontal blue line is just past the second row of columns, which is way too far from the North wall, as the floor plan of the first floor shows the elevators coming out only level with the first row of columns.

"I have no intention to [sic] responding to your bullying tactics other than this one message.," Not bullying, John. Just pointing out yet another cock up by you. The Daltex is opposite the East side of the TSBD. So the first two photos can't be showing the East side of the TSBD. The first photo shows the West side of the TSBD in sunlight, as does the second. North Side in shadow.

How do you explain the buildings behind?

The above first two photos show the West side of the building Not the East side.

Posting derogatory comments, by banned members, of this forum, about anybody, poster or regulator, on this forum should not be allowed. It has nothing to do with free speech. It is common courtesy, and is a form of cowardice by the posters here, who do so on this board, who seem to use the comments as a proxy form of insult. There is usually a very good reason why the banned member have been banned, and there is no good reason to allow their comments to be rebroadcast here.

I believe the mortar bed was usually 1/4" thick.

In the video of Darren Brown, how did the subjects stand lying in a bath of freezing cold water under a trance if the were faking it? The infra red images showed how cold their bodies had become in the freezing water.

Ron, I was talking to a friend of mine who is a Professor, in Criminal Psychology who appears on many British t.v programmes about various murders and he insisted that nobody can be hypnotised to murder somebody, until I showed him this programme by a hypnotist well known in the U.K. Darren Brown, where he hypnotised a guy to "murder" a famous t.v. star whilst the star was on stage. He now doubts his first opinion.See this.

Don't go Francois, You give us too many laughs.

But nobody saw a stranger on the steps, so, according to your logic, if nobody said they saw Oswald on the steps, he couldn't have been there, so it couldn't have been a stranger, David

Thanks, Gary. Look forward to reading it. Well done.

According to the latest argument from the gullible, as nobody reported seeing a stranger on the top of the steps, that means it couldn't have been a stranger. So it must have been an employee.

John doesn't believe in tests. He never tried the post shadow experiment which was suggested to him.

Butler. "Does whatever happened in 2001 and 2002 have anything to do with what happened in the Spring of 1963?" Chris "But google Earth shows that in 2001 it bloomed in February and in 2002 it had not bloomed by March. 23! " It wasn't gobbledygook (except maybe just to you.)Chris was just showing you that the growth in 1961 was different to the growth in 1962, and means it could be different in 1963. Seems you disagree.

Were they looking for him, Francois? Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Even you must comprehend that.

Add together Ochus Campbell seeing Oswald in the small locker room within the vestibule, seems to confirm, that Os was there then. As for it destroying Prayerman theory, this is ridiculous as Oswald, just had to move into the vestibule after the assassination, but then I think that may be too much for Francois to comprehend.

For those who haven't heard it yet, here is a video of the interrogation.

Exactly my way of thinking, Andrej. Things are getting murkier. We await Langley's response.

Yes. Note the end of the paragraph. The man who said he was the building superintendent was outside and met me at the door and went in with me. Shortly after I entered the building, I confronted Oswald. The man who identified himself as the superintendent said that Oswald was alright, that he was employed there. We left Oswald there, and the supervisor showed me the way upstairs. i.e After he had seen Oswald they went upstairs. Sort of blows his Warren testimony out of the water.

From Gary Savage's book, “First day evidence” "OFFICER E" It had been a long escort. We had lot of people all the way. There were no problems, just a heavy crowd and a lot of yelling and cheering, and the motors were getting hot.When you follow the lead, you do a lot of starting and stopping, trying to hold an interval. I was glad it was almost over. The crowd was real heavy, down on the end of the downtown area, but just past Dealey Plaza, it would open up and we would be on the freeway and just a few minutes from the Trade Mart. The front of the motorcade started blocking up in the crowd in those last turns coming off Main and turning onto Elm. Back on Houston where we were, we were just about stopped and moving real slow when we could move. A little past halfway down Houston (between Main and Elm) I heard the first shot. I could tell it came from somewhere in front of me and high. As I looked up I noticed all the pigeons flushed off the top of the building on the corner ahead of me. And in the same period I heard the second shot, and then the third one. I couldn’t see just where the shots came from but I knew they were from a high powered rifle. I hunt a lot, and had just got back from hunting. There was no mistaking that there were three shots, that’s for sure. Though I didn't see exactly where the shots came from. I knew in my own mind they probably came from the corner building as the sound was right and because of the pigeons. So i headed there, got off my motor and entered the building (the Texas School Depository) It tooma while because of the crowd; they had started moving in every direction. The man who said he was the building superintendent was outside and met me at the door and went in with me. Shortly after I entered the building, I confronted Oswald. The man who identified himself as the superintendent said that Oswald was alright, that he was employed there. We left Oswald there, and the supervisor showed me the way upstairs. We couldn’tt get anyone to send the elevator down. In giving the place a quick check, I found nothing out of the ordinary, so started back down to see what had happened. Not knowing for sure what had happened. I was limited in what I could legally do. The investigator from Washington contacted me for my recollection of what had happened, but I guess they weren’t interested in what I said. Who on Earth could officer E have been? Any guesses? Marion Baker anyone? Review of Gary Savage's book. 5.0 out of 5 starsthe evidence that would have sent Oswald to the chair 9 December 2009 Format: Hardcover For serious students of the JFK assassination this book is a 'must have'. There is so much to commend this wonderful publication that it really is very difficult to know where to start. Perhaps it would be best to kick-off with the author and his 'source'. Gary Savage wrote this book in conjunction with his uncle R. W. (Rusty) Livingston. Rusty served with the Dallas Police Department for twenty-three years beginning in 1951. On the evening of JFK's murder Rusty was working in the Crime Scene Search Section of the Identification Bureau. He helped process much of the evidence developed by the DPD. Fortunately for Savage and history, Rusty had maintained reference copies of everything that he worked on. That `everything' is here present in book form as fresh as the day that it was culled from the crime scenes. It's all here - the backyard photographs, the spy camera, the finger prints, plenty of documents and much, much more. The book also features the full rebuttal of the `acoustics evidence' that was used to `sex-up' the 1978 HSCA report with the tantalising "..probability of 95% or better, that there was a fourth shot from the grassy knoll". The rebuttal was prepared by James C. Bowles who was best placed to refute the claim. Wonderful book!

Thanks Chris. Agreed, as shown in this photo which I also posted. It is impossible to work out the time that the photos were taken without knowing the precise lengths of "Oswald's" shadows. For those who still disbelieve, here is another photo simulating the position of "Oswald" and the stair post which shows the shadow of the "stair post" (the pole on the left) in the same region as the stair post in the BYP., and which shows the shadows converging. rather than diverging. Q.E.D.

Thank you Chris. It's exactly what Michael and I have been saying. but they seem to be unable to carry out a simple experiment. When they do, I hope they come back and describe their experience. However, I believe you meant converge rather than diverge in your last sentence, as is shown in my post photo. https://postimg.cc/rzdmZ9y1][/url

I have no intention of sidetracking any subject, but I will interject when somebody posts information which is false. Maybe you don't have the same ethos as I. As for my crappy ideas. There are none so blind as those who will not see. I have very interest in the actual time of the photographs, which if they are fake, as I believe, would show they were fake.

Once again you show your total lack of understanding of anything. You are either blind or ignorant of my past record of posting on various forums. [/quote] You've hitched your wagon to the wrong star, John. Whilst DJ provides much valuable contributions to this and other forums, he is totally wrong about this.