David Josephs Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 Mr. Rago is a banned member from WAAAAAY back... If that is even him... .... yet he is correct... while everyone had cameras and polaroids taken immediately.... he wanders off and a legend is born. Add to this the "other" film from the similar angle which a handful have seen.... and yes... the man's film was treated with a special kind of reverence.... Mrs. Z claims "they" came by and took the original later that evening.... and for those who wonder why so much was left in the film which suggests conspiracy.... 1 shot can be explained away... the alteration was to remove obvious signs of multiple shots very close together... and in places there shouldn't have been shots seen given the 3 shot 3 hit scenario Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paz Marverde Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 4 minutes ago, David Josephs said: Add to this the "other" film from the similar angle which a handful have seen. Which one, please? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron Ecker Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 28 minutes ago, Paz Marverde said: Banned? Apparently so. He says no reason was given. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron Ecker Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 10 minutes ago, David Josephs said: Mr. Rago is a banned member from WAAAAAY back... He says he was never banned here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paz Marverde Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 1 minute ago, Ron Ecker said: Apparently so. He says no reason was given. Thank you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirk Gallaway Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 1 hour ago, James DiEugenio said: Let me repeat: Isn't anyone hear going to ask this guy why he started a thread like this with that pretentious title? Mike is now banned? Oh come on!, this isn't in keeping with our new trend toward more astonishing theories! I must confess, Jim, I had my doubts, but it's good to see you're eagerly up for the challenge! Bring him back! Let's police ourselves and carry on! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron Ecker Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 3 minutes ago, Kirk Gallaway said: Mike is now banned? Oh come on!, this isn't in keeping with our new trend toward more astonishing theories! I must confess, Jim, I had my doubts, but it's good to see you're eagerly up for the challenge! Bring him back! Let's police ourselves and carry on! He says that he's been put on a list of members who are only allowed one post a day. Which is a new one on me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Josephs Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 1 hour ago, Paz Marverde said: Which one, please? We spoke of this in a diff thread PAZ... the film which shows the entire turn, SS agents leaving their car... etc... Same angle as Zapruder... but much more film. (as I have been saying and Chris has been proving) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron Ecker Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 (edited) 14 minutes ago, David Josephs said: We spoke of this in a diff thread PAZ... the film which shows the entire turn, SS agents leaving their car... etc... Same angle as Zapruder... but much more film. (as I have been saying and Chris has been proving) And seeing is believing. Surely someone, somewhere on God's green Earth, has a copy of this film if not the original, and wouldn't mind sharing it, for truth if not for fame and fortune. Edited March 22, 2018 by Ron Ecker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Andrews Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 BANNED? WHY? WHY? WHY? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Von Pein Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 (edited) David Josephs said: ...the film which shows the entire turn, SS agents leaving their car... etc... Same angle as Zapruder... but much more film. 45 minutes ago, Ron Ecker said: Surely someone, somewhere on God's green Earth, has a copy of this film if not the original, and wouldn't mind sharing it, for truth if not for fame and fortune. The film that David Josephs spoke of (if it exists at all) is undoubtedly a re-creation that was filmed in Dealey Plaza for a movie. There have been several of these type of re-creations done for films and mini-series, such as the scene below (which was filmed for the 3-hour TV movie "The Trial Of Lee Harvey Oswald" in 1977). But to think that a REAL (11/22/63) film exists that shows the things David Josephs mentioned is laughable. No "real" film of that nature exists. And it's humorous to think that anyone could possibly think it does. Edited March 22, 2018 by David Von Pein Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron Ecker Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 6 minutes ago, David Von Pein said: The film that David Josephs spoke of (if it exists at all) is undoubtedly a re-creation that was filmed in Dealey Plaza for a movie. There have been several of these type of re-creations done for films and mini-series, such as the scene below (which was filmed for the 3-hour TV movie "The Trial Of Lee Harvey Oswald" in 1977. But to think that a REAL (Nov. 22) film exists that shows the things David Josephs mentioned is laughable. No "real" film of that nature exists. And it's humorous to think that anyone could possibly think it does. David, You win a free chicken dinner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Von Pein Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 (edited) 17 minutes ago, Ron Ecker said: David, You win a free chicken dinner. Can you make it a sirloin steak instead? Edited March 22, 2018 by David Von Pein Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Knight Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 The dish on Mike Rago: Forum rules require a photo for your avatar. Because Mr. Rago refused to provide a photo, his membership went into a "limbo" status until such time as he provided a photo and agreed to abide by forum rules. Mr. Rago recently agreed to do so, and his membership was reinstated. Then he removed his photo, violating forum rules. SO...rather that drop the hammer on his membership, Mr. Rago was placed on a posting limitation. Once he abides by forum rules for a week or longer, rather than mere days, his status may change. [I say "may" because I'm not the one who made the call...but I agree with it, in this instance.] There;'s your transparency. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James DiEugenio Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 (edited) Thanks Mark. Can't wait of his reply to my question. But on his past record, I do not expect a lot. Edited March 22, 2018 by James DiEugenio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now