Vince Palamara

On 8/12/2023 at 2:08 PM, Paul Brancato said:

Nice Bartok soundtrack. The second part of the video could use some explanation. Did you do the video Vince?

It is a compilation. The first part is mine but the majority is another uploader I credit. It's a little bit of a mish mash but he focused on the same area I did, so I decided to compile them.

On 8/12/2023 at 2:17 PM, Mervyn Hagger said:

Personally, I find this entire video very confusing, even though I stopped and restarted it several times. The music is entirely too loud and unnecessary. It is distracting. The idea of the man on the grass talking to the man on the bridge is plausible, but the comment about the rifle and the policemen on the fence who could see what was on the other side of the bridge implies that the man with a radio (which does indeed seem to make sense visually and verbally, having a rifle that the policeman could see .... Well that implies that not only was the policeman part of a plot, but so were the railroad workers unless they were blind. But they spotted smoke from behind the fence at the top of the grass covered little hill. That does not make sense. I am not sure what your thesis is regarding this entire sequence but I cannot agree with you that it is definitive of anything. It seems to raise a lot of questions about the point you are trying make above the din of that music.

I agree about the music- that part of the video was from another channel creator.

The definitive video (compilation) re: the radio man plus: 

18 minutes ago, Micah Mileto said:

So, the theory goes that photographs were altered to hide the fact that the wooden fence was originally structured in a way that would provide better cover for a shooter?

Something like that. Like I said, the tail end is a compilation from someone else. While that point is interesting, my initial focus is on the man with the walkie talkie. 

Thanks! The video is based off page 87 of my book HONEST ANSWERS plus one of my recent videos plus a compilation from another person's video that I credit (he often borrows from my channel, too).

10 minutes ago, Joe Bauer said:

VP, is this someone besides Ferry reading a Ferry transcript?

I have read that Ferry's voice was higher pitched and even a little screechy?

Very surprisingly interesting if this actually was Ferry speaking.

Whoever this was speaking, I am impressed at the almost news journalist trained tone, pacing, resonance and intelligently communicated manner.

Again, like a TV journalist of top caliber.

I could see so-called theater trained Kings English speaking manner Clay Shaw enjoying conversing with the person on the tape you posted.

I always figured Ferry was more "Joe Pesci" hyper frantic, manic and squeaky fast talking in his real life as he was portrayed in Stones film "JFK."

 

This was uploaded by that wunderkind youngster Alex Harris/ The JFK Theorist. Now that you mention it, I am now wondering IF this IS a journalist 'acting' as Ferrie...Hmmm.

@James DiEugenio

9 hours ago, Matthew Koch said:

It can't be any worse than when you used to quote Vincent Bugliosi "They tried to get Kennedy.. But, Oswald got there first" Vince (Bugliosi and Palamara) or the time you motivated those Secret Service Agents to write a book that re affirmed that legend that JFK ordered the "Ivy league charlatans off the limo" 

Henry Lee doesn't have anything to do with the JFK case past being interviewed in a History Channel Episode and Destiny Betrayed about protocol in his  profession about chain of custody... 
 

And if RFK Jr's Comments about Vaccines or Israel is a problem for you it just shows that your a normie that cares what strangers think instead of what the truth of the matter is.. which based on your Trump comments back that up. 

Thanks for the laughs!

53 minutes ago, Joe Bauer said:

Vince, your thoughts?

That is a bummer. Like RFK Jr.'s comments, this damages his credibility re: the JFK case.

Judge finds forensic scientist Henry Lee liable for fabricating evidence in a murder case (msn.com)

14 minutes ago, Benjamin Cole said:

Mark Groubert has been doing an excellent series on the JFKA. 

 

Agreed!

On 6/15/2023 at 10:30 AM, Greg Doudna said:

Velma's voice does sound elderly at the time of the radio interview, but "85" would not work with this Velma Alex b. 1946 because that Velma Alex would not be 85 until the year 2031. Is that "85" (age of Velma at the time of the radio call-in) accurate? (Mentioned above by someone in this thread.) Its not in the partial clip I transcribed. 

Also, Velma in the radio call-in referred to having four children, implied as maybe a single mother, as her reason for not reporting what she saw out of fear. If she was age 17 in 1963 she would not have four children, though Velma could be meaning that as a reason not to tell her story in later years too.

Thanks for all your comments and insights, Greg!

5 hours ago, Paul Cummings said:

I believe this was covered in TMWKK. Reopening Oswald's casket and he noticed the head being moved from what he previously remembered.

On 11/27/2006 at 7:05 PM, Evan Marshall said:

my experiences with the polygraph were always less than satisfactory-you're at the mercy of the operator and what he or she decides is deception.

Velma at the 17:58 mark:

1 hour ago, Larry Hancock said:

These connections have been known and discussed for a long time unless I'm missing something here?

http://jfk.hood.edu/Collection/Weisberg Subject Index Files/F Disk/Ferrie David William/Item 85.pdf

https://spartacus-educational.com/JFKarcacha.htm

Beyond that as far as I can tell far Albert is not related or connected to Rose so that is not part of any revelation - until someone proves in such a connection.

 

Thanks, Larry. Much appreciated.

18 hours ago, Cory Santos said:

Vince where did you get this?   I just saw a YouTube show talking about this.   Ferrie”s witness stated afterwards as one thing to the affect that “well, we tried.”  A little background please.  

Hi, Cory--just seeing your message now (work and sleep interfere with my time on the forum haha!). For the life of me, I do not remember where I obtained that (which is unusual for me, as I have a very good memory, if I do say so myself). That said, I was confident enough to put that in a public Facebook photo album a couple years ago, so I felt confident that is was legit.

1 minute ago, James DiEugenio said:

I do not think so.

But that is interesting about SAS and Ferrie.

Recall, when SAS tried to deny an association with Ferrie, his wife said they sued to watch fims of the Bay of Pigs together!

Can you imagine how plugged in SAS was to have those.

Thanks, Jim!

2 minutes ago, Benjamin Cole said:

Rose Cherami is also spelled "Cheramie." Is Albert Cheramie related? 

This document certainly connect Sergio Arcacha Smith, Banister and Ferrie. Parts of this were known before, no? 

THIS is what I am wondering.

@James DiEugenio

ADMIN FOLDER-L9: HSCA ADMINISTRATIVE FOLDER, LHO INCOMING COMMUNICATIONS, VOLUME III (maryferrell.org)

1 minute ago, Benjamin Cole said:

Ugh. 

"LHO acted alone."

And fired a single-shot bolt-action rifle twice in one second. 

Anyone in publishing knows how hard it is to get a book published. 

Why this flurry of "LHO did it alone" books now? 

Agreed. It is because of the 60th anniversary. Clint Hill is REISSUING his book with special 60th anniversary stickers and tiny updates this fall + Paul Landis is coming out with a book, too.

JFK, Oswald and Ruby: Politics, Prejudice and Truth: Griffin Warren Commission Assistant Counsel, Burt W.: 9781476687766: Amazon.com: Books