Kirk Gallaway

But that Campisi is out of New York, Ben right?. This Joe Campisi had an Italian restaurant in Dallas. This article talks of alleged mob ties that i had previously read in JFKA literature was a sure thing. Good Picture! https://www.dallasnews.com/news/curious-texas/2020/09/04/did-campisis-have-ties-to-organized-crime-curious-texas-looks-at-the-history/

Hey you guys on the right, remember how your guts got twisted in knots to see Galloway come before our own Senate and shame them about your beloved Iraq War! Hey good for him, but this was a lot more earthshaking at the time with thousands of lives in the balance! This is priceless! It's really binary thinking. The solid majority in the U.S. don't want goons to stop the certification of their elections by Fascists so now the Fascists and their goons are whining that the vast majority who want the orderly transition of government have thrown in their lots with the National Security State. Boo hoo! Stop whining.because you couldn't get the majority of people to give their rights over to you! Boo hoo again! To most of them the foremost JFKA moment of their lives is when after 1/6, Trump got banned from Twitter! And they're still reeling! That is the peak of their entire political live's emotional arc! That's the greatest extent of political devastation they'll ever experience! Spare us!

Hey I won't address the sort of snideness I heard. But one thing about James, is that I think I know what his interests are.. heh heh But I'm into a lot of the same things! But what I was referring to, over a few posts I've read is that I couldn't find fault in anything he said. That's all

Ben: There is a solution to "labor shortages." It is called higher wages, to being supply and demand back into balance. Labor shortages are measured my the number of available jobs to people who are available to work. and it's been very high right now So we're in a labor shortage. Right? Weren't you're sort of into economics? Do you believe checking labor statistics or is that a conspiracy? Ben: There is a solution to "labor shortages." It is called higher wages I'd like that but the truth is in this recent " labor shortage" they started leveling off before the fed Fed even tightened. You're going to have to starve the work force a lot more before you'll see that kind of service wage growth you project. It would be more proactive to unionize.

No, the same old doctrinaire solutions don't apply in the U.S. Chris, Ben, Same old, same old, you're not in the country and your only lens in evaluating this is the newest headlines you're getting about the borders from right wing media.. I don't think I can fault anything James has said on this forum yet. Re: immigration, in the U.S. We currently have a situation where there's almost 2 workers for every person willing to work. A lot of the low wage jobs, and where you see a lot of hiring signs is in service industry, restaurants, fast food, cleaning hotels, and of course out in the fields. And you see overwhelmingly white people simply won't take those jobs. Sensible immigration is needed but the Republicans brand the Democrats as being for open borders like you Ben and the Democrats brand Republicans for being for closed borders.Both sides know it's false but won't work each other. There are a lot of restaurants, hotels , farms that are small businesses that are struggling to survive.The situation now is stupid, in that people are allowed in the country to wait for the immigration case, and they can't work. Right now, instead of scoring na na na points loading people up to Martha's Vineyard. We need people in the fields. They could be directing people to where the jobs are, on a short term basis, just like in the old bracero programs. . The Fed is on a crusade to strangle the hot economy by raising interest rates to bring down inflation..In normal cycles, their primary aim would be to bring down wage inflation to the working person, but that's not working very well, though inflation has cooled somewhat. They could well force the nation into recession with this draconian series of of interest rates hikes they are doing, but they keep pushing on because the decline in wage inflation hasn't happened, but that's because it appears we're heading to a white collar, not a blue collar recession.Though it's not conclusive we're heading to a recession. The danger is that they can't know the effects of their current policy as it's been front loading and they typically don't see the effect for a year or so after they begin.

It's actually damn cold here too. High of 59! But it was very cool to see 2 conservative icons feeling each other out. My son sent me this.

As I said. I sense a sea change.i think Morley's right. But I noticed it first a couple of weeks ago, a sort of impatience, before the files were to be released and before Carlson. The MSM has decided at this second delay to demand their free speech rights. I'd like to think this is ongoing.

I think Pat's timeline is correct, Reagan reinvigorated the Intelligence state with William Casey But it never really got back to the level of the 50's and 60's, which doesn't mean you shouldn't be vigilant. For those who take comfort in a "deep state". I don't mean to bust the bubble, but I don't think the government can get away with 20% of what they could get away with in the 60's. But I don't claim to be an expert. But they certainly got better technology to track us. That's where some big problems are. Still the IRS has an over 30 year old computer system, which pretty much shows our government priorities. Of course to contrast there will always be Ben who claims the "deep state" are more powerful than ever and then he'll say that the stated 750 billion the pentagon says they spend this year is actually double that, mostly being black budget and some veteran's benefits, he wants to eliminate, that he got from an Indian article he read, I believe. So take it with a grain of salt, the estimate's are all over the place. But it's important to get some perspective, the OMB can't surreptitiously double the Defense budget and hope no one will see it. The heyday of government funding was after the war where the U.S. emerged as the world superpower as result of largely remaining unscathed from WW2, and controlling nearly half the world's resources. And due to higher taxation rates, the size of the government skyrocketed and government department heads became gods within themselves. That condition doesn't exist anymore. Jean Paul, it wouldn't surprise me if Lance would also want the release of files. Yes, Gene, and Truman released that one month after the assassination 12/22/1963, I believe. I've never heard that quote from Gates. That would be very powerful.

I'd say coastal California has more Teslas per capita than any place in the world, and they use to all be very shiny, but now they're a lot of dirty Teslas around and even junkers! Greenwald's relit his hair on fire on twitter again! Hope he's ok! Majority rule's a bitch, ain't it Glenn? Let's move this along. Bring on the hard core nespotism! heh heh

I agree, if this is actionable, why isn't it? Nice to hear a sobering author Larry, Yeah As I say, the story sounds novice. I suppose he might not say another word about it, but when related news comes up, say something like"Of course we have an inside source who says he believes the CIA was behind the assassination!" I'm not familiar enough with his show to know what he routinely can get way with. But it doesn't matter what we think. All that matters is if this story goes somewhere, and Carlson doesn't end up damaging us. W. He never really claimed to have a CIA source, did he? It could be an archivist. You're running with the story that Tucker got Pompeo drunk one night and is now trying to out him. Ok It's me who kept asking you until I gave up W. You've said many times, you've got your hopes up. But what tangibly, are you hoping for? Or what events do you look to have happen?. Be specific.

Thanks Matt, it is an excellent one! This guy is really articulate! I did search "false tweets, Jack Smith" because it is so outrageous! But got nothing. I shouldn't delete it though, right? Let the audience go through the changes! Though it is a letdown! ·

So you're just starting to consider that Ben? If anybody without a following here said that he's seen the remaining files and there is indeed a smoking gun there and he now "believes" the CIA is behind the death of JFK, and said nothing else, as Carlson has said of his source, we'd laugh at him! It does sound like novice BS, doesn't it? I checked out his show last night, nothing!, " gay dancers in drag affecting kids" .Didn't he get that story from you Ben? heh heh He doesn't followup stories all the time. But this is a whopper! Ok, all speculation, but nothing matters except what he can produce in the future.

Wow! Prosecutor Jack Smith trash talking to Trump on twitter! I was wondering if this is legal, but he's goading Trump! Tweet Conversation Yow Jack Smith here. My digital trading cards for you Trump are subpoenas. And NFT stands for No Fxxxing Thanks to your latest grifter scheme. What’s hilarious is he thinks his maggots understand digital cards. Answer @JoJoFromJerz Becky Sue about how to stick them to her car. 8:45 AM · Dec 19, 2022 Replying to @costapoker and @JoJoFromJerz Jack Smith This epic Sunday meltdown has been brought to you by the J6 Committee, DOJ and the District Attorneys of New York and Georgia. No, I am not “amplifying” him. I am showing you how increasingly desperate and unhinged he is getting as the walls close in. His anguish in anticipation of Justice…is the opening salvo of Justice. 8:12 AM · Dec 18, 2022 Replying to @7Veritas4 “To truly strip a man of everything, one must take away his community, money, and corrode the core of his beliefs until he is left bathed in the agony of isolation.” Jack E. Smith @costapoker defeating Trump isn't the objective, it's a step to defeating Trumpism and corrupt politicians resistance continues

I probably wasn't clear Sandy. I think the context you use conspiracy theories here is totally right on. And nobody here among us should feel any hesitancy to use the term "conspiracy theory". We know who we are.

Sandy , What are you saying??? Jim said "conspiracy theories" are what the CIA wanted us to call them back after the JFKA!!!! What's the matter with you?! and what else would you call them? They are just theories, and they are about conspiracies, and now there' a million of them. and the great majority of them are BS, and they're discrediting the JFKA.. People here should get the sticks out of their butts and start making distinctions. We're under no obligation to give cover to wacko theories. And talk about discernment, I'll leave it up to Jim di to faithfully count new eyeballs, but do you think it's wise to throw our lot in with this group? Not that we have any choice anymore anyway. We should be hearing soon where Carlson is going to take this.

No big deal Jared and Elon just happen to be there! right? These congressman all texted Mark Meadows in the period before 1/6. Definitely among some of the most wacko! https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=gop+lawmakers+who+texted+meadows#fpstate=ive&vld=cid:09753d3c,vid:Tli6z1hRw40

Jared and Elon and the boys. In the future case that twitter should surveils us. Codename: Lone skum

Roger:I'm not getting involved in the Carlson motives diversion. I know Roger. Does everything have to be political? But unfortunately,you can't separate Carlson from the politics of the day. His message often filters down the same. The government is evil. All they do is tax you on your hard earned money, and gives you nothing back and will and may yet overthrow your government! I can further explain his aim in his continual anti government diatribe at the bottom. Carlson: In short they can do anything they want.- BS! So Tucker thinks the deep state was so afraid of Trump? Yet they have a recording of Trump trying to throw an election in Georgia, and after 2 years they're too timid to even make an indictment. The government now has become so stifled with bureaucracy and politics, they can't do anything. I'm sure something will become of it. But 2 years? Carlson:They can affect elections---BS, probably the fairest election we ever had! Carlson: and murder Presidents.--more BS again, so Tucker thinks the deep state was so afraid of Trump? Why didn't they just kill him? Carlson Source---"It's a whole different country from what we thought it was. It's all fake!" "It's all fake." That sounds like something I'd say over and over again when I was 10 years old". And we're supposed to believe this came from a high up official? Of course the point is we didn't know at the time that an element of our Security State possibly overthrew the government. But the idea that we changed forever and never got it back because of the JFKA has a lot of appeal here, and the authors here do benefit from that perception. But if you're going to assign blame. It was really the Vietnam War which was at least a magnitude 10 more powerful because it directly affected everyday people. That's why things never came back! But get real and stop the sentimentalizing! You can never go back! Another myth perpetuated here by Carlson is that something magically changed that day and the same regime is dominating us to this day. (Like Carlson's employers????) and yet the current power structure has so many new and different characters now, and the great majority of them don't think the JFKA was a great thing, and either think we have, or probably wish we could get down to the truth of it as well and they bear no relation to the coup of the 60's, but are only much more insidious! It's so completely different now. And the JFKAC still hasn't adjusted to a completely non 60's power structure. "It's a whole different country from what we thought it was. It's all fake." But here's the irony. But still it was just one aspect of life at the time. In reality the U.S. was much more real after the 60's than they were after the 50's. American culture was sizzling, and the power of it's civilization was at it's apex. Not just JFK but it's interesting to speculate where we'd be now if there were 16 years of Kennedys, and RFK became President, and stayed President. But of course, now we've seen how 8 years of Obama freaked America out! Though I was sucked into it as a young man, we now see how illusory it is to think that Bobby could have wiped out racial prejudice in the U.S.! Could it have just been suppressed to come out later? Watching the silly pendulum over the last 50 years. How much could the Kennedys have done that would be reflected now? It's hard to say. **** The right wing seizes on the JFKA to try to persuade people that all the government does is tax you on your hard earned money and gives you nothing back and will even overthrow the will of the people. So you're better off to just defund the government "deep state". It is the message of the ultra wealthy, the elites (despite their supposed disdain for the elites) and the International Corporate state*, and their goal is to to defund the "administrative state" as Steve Banon has called it to maybe the size of government in the 50's or in the more extreme case the 30's. *Not that those interests are just exclusive to just the right wing.

Good performance Larry! I think you took control and could do a longer segment. I very much appreciate all you have done and from what I've seen, I think you're circulating the issue around well! The historic photos are good, but not as the foreground! I'd give you more full screen, but they're all always split screening Tucker with his guest. i don't know what I would call that look that Tucker always has on face when he's listening to guests. it's been commented on a number of times humorously. As simply as I can say. He looks like a guy whose straining------so-------- hard to impress you how intently he is listening! Thanks again, Larry!

All good points Eddie. But that didn't start with just Tucker. All the MSM has now decided it's concerned about open government with these files being put off again.. It's true there isn't any pushback to the deeper agency involvement with Oswald now. Carlson's playing the heavy card and saying the CIA's behind the JFKA. We can't do anything anyway about Carlson but let him play out his hand. if he's just playing the usual Carlson game and doesn't follow up or really have anything, it can reflect bad on us. But apart from Carlson, there's definitely a sea change and a willingness from the MSM to look a bit deeper. There could be a tipping point, where they see it could also give better ratings. The situation in general, is looking up!

Yes I know Matt , but the Kennedy family have been either cowards or great slackers for whatever reason. We didn't hear from RFK Jr. for 50 years! Jim if you're the guy who hepped him to what was going on. You might have him explain to us the Kennedy family obstruction for 50 years. Are we entitled to that? Or are we just looked upon as nuts to the family at large? Have you've been the least curious? Do you personally have any insight? Or do you prefer to honor the 50 year Kennedy family silence? Unfortunately the JFKA research community is like a battered housewife who never got any support from Kennedy kids to confirm their story, and had to strike out completely on their own. Despite all the fawning rationalizations, RFK as AG should have probably taken a bold step to avenge the death of his brother, and the fact that he looked so weak is probably the reason for his death. Are you sure tying the fortunes of the JFKAC to Tucker Carlson is such a good idea? Then we'll have a perfunctory look into the CIA's involvement, and maybe that will hasten a look into the remaining files, but maybe by a few "trusted" individuals like Tunheim, and they'll tell us "Nothing to see here folks." because despite what Tucker has told you, there probably isn't! And it's true it won't stop the skepticism but the MSM will proclaim "Well now we've historically done all we can do",. and we'll be back to another "square one."

W. I'm aware of your political leanings, and as you should know, I largely share them. But you only half answered my question. You believe there is a source, and you're very pleased that he's vented things you've always wanted to hear on TV. I ask you and everyone else. Does it a ultimately matter to you if there is a source? Will you 1) be disappointed if there is no followup and you never hear from Tucker any more about these files? or say, nothing more from the source? or 2) will you love him all the more because he's vented things you've always wanted to hear?

I generally liked what Roger wrote, then I got to this part. Roger: We don't know who Carlson's source is, or even if he exists. But read the whole quote of the source again, not just the first part, and it is clear that Carlson is using him to set up his main point of the episode. After saying the CIA was involved, the source offers his take on what the result of the murder has been: "It's a whole different country from what we thought it was. It's all fake." All you here who believe Tucker's clip was revolutionary like Ben( who ranks it next to Eisenhower's MIC speech and Trump first walking down the escalator) and believe he does have an "undisclosed source" who has seen the hidden files and says he "believes" that the CIA killed JFK. Does it a ultimately matter to you if there is a source? Will you 1) be disappointed if there is no followup and you never hear from Tucker again about these files? or 2) will you love him all the more because he's venting things you've always wanted to hear?

LANCE: Circuit court judgeThe "'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that [Carlson] is not 'stating actual facts' about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in 'exaggeration' and 'non-literal commentary.' " Well Matt, at least Lance is quoting me about the case for Tucker's legal liability being thrown out because it's just understood, he's not in the business of credibility! So Lance, did you take our advice and go back to your online file and scrub it clean or are you still pushing that' you're our inside infiltrator into the Arizona Narco Squad? heh heh Sorry I couldn't wrest you from your completely pedestrian take of Jack Ruby, despite all his connections, and clips of witnesses. I never had any hope for DVP as he has chosen to narrow himself into a tightly circumscribed area where he's completely lost to any possible geopolitical implication to the JFKA. To use one of his baseball analogies, he is like a starting pitcher who took himself out in the 3rd inning because he doesn't want to face any batter a second time. He's like a guy who wanted to study the JFKA from Indiana (which didn't stop Mark Knight!) and now changing focus would require getting out of Indiana and taking up skiing in his 60's! Not much chance of that!