Paul Brancato

That’s right - 100%

I came across this thread after asking the question what was the relationship between William Harvey and Tracy Barnes? They, like many others, were stationed in Germany in the mid 1950’s. Yesterday I watched the Jefferson Morley podcast with Steven Jaffe, who posted on this forum for a while. As a young man he worked for Garrison as an investigator, and one thing he mentioned while posting here was that Garrison sent him to France to talk to their Intelligence services and see what they knew. I asked Steve at the time to elaborate, and he simply said I/we would have to wait for his book, which btw is still unreleased but in the works. On the Podcast Steve talks about this visit, and drops only one American name given to him by French investigators - William Harvey. Steve also goes on to explain the origins of the book Farewell America by the pseudonymous James Hepburn, saying that it was written by several Frenchman each working on a particular angle. The Podcast was really interesting, and for me especially this part. If you can imagine this, the Student revolt at the Sorbonne caused him to be unable to follow up with his French Intelligence contact, due to communications being shut down. So he goes to Geneva to be able to continue, and when he arrives he finds out that RFK has been murdered.

What a ridiculous comment

Amazing and new news for me. What was HSCA doing letting Army and Navy Brass into that most important HSCA meeting?

I dIdnt know about the ‘burn party’. Can you say more?

Destroying documents - the Military was particularly guilty of this

What is clear is that Tippit could have been at Dealey Plaza for the main event, and at the Gloco station 15 minutes later.

A very good choice

Leslie - who is Bergman? Also I did not know about Argentine shipments to Israel.

Christian - I appreciate what you are trying to reveal. I can’t say I always see what you see, but I don’t dismiss your work based on my own visual acuity. In fact, what you have concluded about shooters dressed as DP, or even DP officers in fact, is really the most logical assumption. It is the perfect cover, and is nothing new. I once posted, after a deep dive into timings and testimony, that officer Tippet could have himself been at the scene. It is not at all contradicted by his movements as we know them. Thanks to Joseph McBride we also know that he was a crack shot. And of course we know he was shortly thereafter killed. I’ve always thought that suspicious in itself, and think it’s highly likely that he was killed because, whether or not he was a shooter, he knew too much.

Felix Rodriguez - what a crock. Castro killed JFK, Fabian Escalante the second shooter, Jimmy Carter ruined the CIA, the Democrats are a bunch of socialists.

This may be because of secrets held by Israel regarding Angleton’s. According to a friend who is working through the latest unredacted files concerning Angleton’s closed door Senate testimony, Angleton was closely tied with Saudi Arabia, and generally with British interests which were largely pro Arab because of Oil. His close connections with Israeli Intelligence seems to be in the service of Anti-Soviet operations, and Nazi functionaries were Angleton’s go to interrogators. If both Mossad and CIA used an agent such as Otto Skorzeny, which appears true, then they had mutual checks on each other, since neither would want that kind of relationship public. In regards to the 1967 war and ensuing takeover of the West Bank and Golan Heights, you never hear Zionist supporters in the US mention this, and if they do of course they frame it as a necessary preemptive attack on Egypt and Syria.

The main takeaway from this is that the source, Pompeo or not, convinced Tucker Carlson that Angleton was the guy. I have no problem with that. It appears that both Trump and Pompeo know this.

Simple question - if Angleton suspected someone of being a Soviet mole, would he necessarily expose him? Wouldn’t it have been more clever of Angleton to leave him in place?

What was the McMahon issue? I’ve tried to contact Newman more than once, unsuccessfully. Turf wars, closed shops. The article you linked by Morley indicates he wasn’t about to climb on the Tennent Bagley train. Newman certainly has, and he clearly sees Golitsyn as the real defector and Nosenko as the fake one. It’s like Angleton’s ghost with Bagley as the medium. It is interesting, as you point out, that Newman went on this tangent, and my inclination is to view him as the pied piper.

This post especially.

I found it, but not access to read it. Would you mind taking some time to explain exactly what you’re thinking? Your last few posts are intriguing but I don’t know some of the references.

You are referring to an article he wrote called ‘the fourth mole’? How can we access it?

Do we know the identity of Litamel-3?

Did the folks arguing here twice ignore your posted link to an interesting article? Sure, we can argue about this death or that death, about how to calculate probabilities. But the notion that people weren’t being killed as part of the ongoing conspiracy is just absolutely ludicrous, and I can’t believe that some of you would even approach that level. The main point, and I think Bill got to this quite well, is that a carefully curated list of deaths of journalists following the case early on, and as others have pointed out witnesses dying around the time of both the Garrison trial and the HSCA hearings, is the most convincing evidence of not just the conspiracy on the day of, but of the depth of the conspiracy going forward. Busting the single bullet theory was good, and few would argue that it has been shone to be fallacy at best, but it doesn’t show the venality of the perpetrators going forward in time. One can find excuses for the Warren Commission, not that I believe them btw, but suspicious deaths in such large numbers going forward in time for 15 years puts things in its proper context. And let’s include RFK, MLK, Malcom X here too, because the context is the continued overthrow of anything or anyone that stands in the way of the power elite.

The information in this series of posts about dead journalists is new information for me, and I think Bill Simpich makes a good case that these deaths may have dampened the enthusiasm of other journalists to follow the trail they were trying to blaze.

I’ve read both books, both great and important works.

Thanks for sharing this Doug.

Wow Bill - some doozies here since your last post. It seems to me that Newman is on the wrong track. I may be mistaken, but having had many exchanges with Tommy Graves years ago before he left the forum, I think he sees a Soviet plot to kill JFK. it also seems to me that Newman is heading in the same direction. Your research on Golitsyn and Angleton and Tennent Bagley shows the trio to be paranoid at best, and certainly up to something nefarious. Can I use the word ‘liars’? Might I ask - what is your impression of where Newman is going with all this? Blunt, Bagley, Solie? It feels like a resurrection of James Angleton.

The last time I gave it a try I asked whether Otto Skorzeny and Arnold Silver knew each other, and the response was that Otto killed Arnold during the war. Your point is well taken